Frozen JevBench release v1.4.1

JevBench v1.4.1 — frozen results

This page always uses the public, hash-checked v1.4.1 artifact. The live board may change when a later release is published.

Artifact SHA-256 808909c4ecc891fcee7eec0931cefa1b424cb60371412cd6480c0ecff9e48570.

534 public + 308 sealed decisions · only system-level sealed aggregates are published.

Share this version · View live board

JevBench v1.4.1 ranking

JevBench v1.4.1

JevBench Composite Score: 77 ranked systems

Official· four axes 0–100, equal-weight harmonic mean · What changed in v1.4 ↓

Weights:
Adjust weights ↓

View by:Capability ↑

The official order weighs Intelligence, Calibration, Speed and Cost equally. Each button re-sorts the same systems by one axis.

Greener = stronger within its column.

82 of 82 systems, sorted by official rank, #1 first.

  1. 1Jev 1.13.0APIJev referenceBase model: undisclosed63.3I 53C 76S 83K 52$0.040
  2. 2JevK5 v0.2.0adapter · 4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource62.0I 49C 75S 91K 60est.$0.022
  3. 3Hopperadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource59.4I 48C 79S 87K 59est.$0.024
  4. 4Winnow-12B Q8merge · 12B · GGUF Q8_0Base model: google/gemma-4-12B-itsource55.6I 48C 65S 82K 53est.$0.037
  5. 5reflex 4Badapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource54.0I 47C 70S 68K 60est.$0.022
  6. 6djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma)26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource52.2I 47C 55S 91K 58ann.$0.026
  7. 7Jev-Omnifine-tuneBase model: google/gemma-4-12B-itsource51.3I 47C 64S 82K 53est.$0.037
  8. 8metask-jev-4b4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource47.8I 45C 67S 89K 55est.$0.033
  9. 9SemIf4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource47.7I 44C 67S 84K 59est.$0.022
  10. 10Jobe Qwen3.5-4B4BBase model: undisclosed*146.9I 44C 66S 86K 60est.$0.022
  11. 11local-jev Qwen3.5-4Bfine-tune · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource46.8I 44C 73S 75K 56est.$0.030
  12. 12system-one-openAPIadapter · 2BBase model: Gemma 4 E2Bsource45.1I 44C 55S 77K 65est.$0.015
  13. 13spark-s1-4b-v6adapter · 4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource44.6I 45C 48S 81K 58est.$0.025
  14. 14jqv32BBase model: Qwen3-32Bsource44.4I 46C 72S 75K 47est.$0.056
  15. 15Qwen3-Reranker-4BRerankerBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Basesource43.5I 45C 65S 79K 49$0.050
  16. 16decider-35b-a3bfine-tune · 35B-A3BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Basesource41.2I 47C 65S 81K 45est.$0.067
  17. 17Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logitsoriginal · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (unmodified)source41.0I 46C 29S 88K 60est.$0.022
  18. 18OpenSourceJevadapter · 4B · GGUF Q4_K_MBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource40.9I 42C 60S 82K 64est.$0.016
  19. 19ZeroEntropy zerank-2RerankerBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4Bsource40.2I 42C 76S 79K 50$0.047
  20. 20decision-machine-1APIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed39.9I 41C 68S 93K 54$0.035
Show all 82 systems (57 more ranked, 5 more not ranked)
  1. 21Raw Phi-4 mini direct logitsoriginalBase model: microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct (unmodified)source38.0I 42C 59S 89K 50est.$0.048
  2. 22JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP49B · NVFP4Base model: ig1/Qwen3.5-9B-NVFP4source37.7I 47C 68S 93K 43est.$0.077
  3. 23OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16)26B-A4B · NVFP4Base model: undisclosed*236.9I 45C 55S 83K 45est.$0.066
  4. 24kev 4Badapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Basesource*336.1I 42C 40S 76K 62est.$0.019
  5. 25Decision 2Badapter · 2BBase model: openbmb/MiniCPM5-2Bsource35.8I 39C 74S 84K 63est.$0.018
  6. 26Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2adapter · 9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource35.2I 47C 61S 82K 42est.$0.083
  7. 27GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort)APIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed35.1I 96C 92S 74K 37$0.127
  8. 28SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27BAPI27BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-27Bsource34.6I 52C 74S 71K 39est.$0.104
  9. 29NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixedLLM decoderBase model: Qwen3.8-Flash-Nextsource34.0I 50C 79S 88K 39est.$0.109
  10. 30GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort)APIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed33.3I 97C 93S 73K 36$0.135
  11. 31open-alternative-jev4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource33.2I 39C 59S 83K 60est.$0.022
  12. 32jev-local9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource32.5I 45C 64S 69K 43est.$0.077
  13. 33Decision Fastadapter · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource32.5I 37C 65S 82K 76est.$0.0063
  14. 34decider-2badapter · 2BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B-Basesource30.7I 39C 43S 83K 61est.$0.020
  15. 35jeffEncoder / classifierBase model: undisclosedsource30.6I 37C 68S 63K 77est.$0.0060
  16. 36Layafine-tune · 421MBase model: ModernBERT-largesource30.3I 36C 64S 71K 86est.$0.0029
  17. 37lev-350madapterBase model: LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350Msource28.5I 35C 71S 85K 76est.$0.0063
  18. 38openjev-sglangAPI35B-A3BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3Bsource27.7I 49C 69S 77K 36est.$0.131
  19. 39Vonfine-tune · 395MBase model: answerdotai/ModernBERT-largesource27.5I 34C 76S 70K 78est.$0.0055
  20. 40NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5)27BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource26.9I 51C 76S 80K 35est.$0.145
  21. 41NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP427BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource26.3I 51C 67S 80K 35est.$0.145
  22. 42kev 8Badapter · 8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Basesource25.6I 42C 40S 75K 44est.$0.073
  23. 43JevOneadapterBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3Bsource25.5I 48C 78S 88K 36est.$0.137
  24. 44SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAPI35B-A3BBase model: undisclosedsource24.9I 46C 60S 75K 38est.$0.116
  25. 45kev 0.6Badapter · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource24.8I 34C 50S 76K 76est.$0.0063
  26. 46Raw Qwen3 8B direct logitsoriginal · 8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Basesource23.7I 46C 24S 86K 42est.$0.087
  27. 47system-one8BBase model: Qwen3-8Bsource23.4I 44C 33S 84K 41est.$0.089
  28. 48OpenDecisionEncoder / classifierBase model: MoritzLaurer/ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0source21.6I 32C 57S 80K 75est.$0.0066
  29. 49LitJev27BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-27Bsource19.5I 46C 77S 67K 34est.$0.163
  30. 50openJev Verdict 1.4Encoder / classifierBase model: knowledgator/gliclass-modern-base-v2.0source19.0I 29C 72S 78K 82est.$0.0039
  31. 51kev 0.5Badapter · 0.5BBase model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5Bsource18.9I 31C 50S 77K 76est.$0.0063
  32. 52Bespoke Nimble 9Badapter · 9BBase model: Qwen3.5-9Bsource18.7I 46C 56S 79K 33est.$0.166
  33. 53GPT-5.6 LunaAPIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed18.5I 93C 87S 78K 28$0.242
  34. 54openJev Verdictfine-tuneBase model: knowledgator/gliclass-modern-base-v2.0source 1source 218.1I 30C 47S 77K 83est.$0.0037
  35. 55Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logitsoriginal · 1.7BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Basesource18.1I 33C 24S 90K 65est.$0.015
  36. 56reflex-27b27BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource17.8I 46C 77S 67K 32est.$0.181
  37. 57djev (thinking)26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource15.2I 72C 88S 75K 27est.$0.274
  38. 58GLiNER2 largefine-tuneBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-largesource15.1I 31C 25S 62K 73est.$0.0077
  39. 59OpenJev (thinking, BF16)26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource 1source 214.8I 58C 58S 76K 28est.$0.255
  40. 60Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Modelfine-tune · 0.8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Basesource14.5I 28C 68S 49K 76est.$0.0065
  41. 61Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteAPIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed14.3I 54C 59S 82K 27$0.264
  42. 62open-jev-deberta-v3-largeadapterBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-largesource12.6I 26C 67S 66K 74est.$0.0073
  43. 63smalljev semantic-v9adapter · 2BBase model: openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B-Basesource12.3I 26C 59S 80K 58est.$0.025
  44. 64GLiNER2adapterBase model: DeBERTa-v3-basesource11.8I 27C 25S 72K 83est.$0.0037
  45. 65Open-Jev 9Badapter · 9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource11.2I 44C 62S 72K 28est.$0.249
  46. 66Open-Jev 2Badapter · 2BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-2Bsource10.0I 42C 55S 73K 28est.$0.249
  47. 67GLiNER2.5 multifine-tune · 287MBase model: mDeBERTa-v3-basesource9.8I 23C 57S 68K 82est.$0.0039
  48. 68SimpleJev0.8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8Bsource7.5I 21C 49S 57K 68est.$0.011
  49. 69GLiNER2.5 smallfine-tune · 74MBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-xsmallsource7.2I 20C 51S 78K 82est.$0.0039
  50. 70Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logitsoriginal · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource7.1I 23C 21S 90K 74est.$0.0074
  51. 71DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAPILLM decoderBase model: undisclosed4.8I 94C 96S 72K 17$0.594
  52. 72MirrorEncoder / classifierBase model: undisclosed2.1I 14C 26S 71K 73est.$0.0077
  53. 73Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2RerankerBase model: Qwen2.5 (size not stated)source 1source 20.4I 7C 84S 88K 68$0.012
  54. 74BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3fine-tuneBase model: BAAI/bge-m3source0.2I 5C 84S 90K 73$0.0077
  55. 75Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-basefine-tuneBase model: answerdotai/ModernBERT-basesource0.2I 5C 79S 91K 70$0.010
  56. 76Certo v1Encoder / classifierBase model: ModernBERT-largesource0.0I 0C 83S 94K 100est.$0.0010
  57. 77Open Jev JSON Canvas26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource0.0I 48C 0S 84K 46est.$0.065
  58. classifier.dev (honorable mention)APIClosed APIBase model: undisclosed70.8I 52C 72S 88K 84est.$0.0033
  59. Qwen3.8 27B (partial run)API27BBase model: undisclosed0.0I 40C 94S 61K 0est.$2.669
  60. swanOne (partial run)NVFP4Base model: Mia-AiLab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4source—I –C –S –K –est.$0.111
  61. Needle 3, options as tools (partial run)original · 121MBase model: undisclosedsource—I –C –S –K –est.$0.014
  62. Needle 3 (partial run)original · 121MBase model: undisclosedsource—I –C –S –K –est.$0.024

Base-model notes

  1. *1 Jobe Qwen3.5-4B (base model: undisclosed): No verified public base-model disclosure recorded for this unmeasured evaluated variant.
  2. *2 OpenJev (base model: undisclosed): No verified public base-model disclosure recorded for this unmeasured evaluated variant.
  3. *3 kev 4B (base model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Base): Evaluated Qwen3 variant; later releases use a different base.
Weights:
Adjust weights ↓

Weights are relative: each axis counts in proportion to its slider. The score stays a weighted harmonic mean with the low-axis gates; an axis at 0 drops out together with its gate. Only equal weights give the official JevBench Score and rank.

Score = 4 / (1/I + 1/C + 1/S + 1/K) (each 0–100; × (axis / 50)² for Intelligence, Speed or Cost below 50)

  • Jev — reference (TypeSafe, closed) (1)
  • Closed API (weights not public) (6)
  • Open weights · LLM decoder (47)
  • Open weights · diffusion LM (5)
  • Open weights · encoder / classifier (13)
  • Open weights · reranker (5)
  • Base model control (no decision fine-tune, raw logits) (5)
  • Shown, not ranked
I, C, S, K = Intelligence, Calibration, Speed, Cost; the est. pill = estimated cost; ann. = announced price; API = the operator's endpoint saw held-out benchmark inputs, without answers; $/1k decisions = US dollars per 1,000 decisions (not heat-shaded). Names link to each project.

Compare two systems

Pick any two. Four radars: the score axes, accuracy per tier including the sealed set, and accuracy by family on the v1.2 hard tier and on the sealed set. Further out is better on every spoke; the link keeps the pair.

  • A: Jev 1.13.0 — Jev — reference (TypeSafe, closed) · Score 63.3 (#1)
  • B: JevK5 v0.2.0 — Open weights · LLM decoder · Score 62.0 (#2)

The four score axes

Radar: the four score axes, two systemsThe four score axes, Jev 1.13.0 vs JevK5 v0.2.0. Intelligence: 53.1 vs 48.9; Calibration: 76.3 vs 74.5; Speed: 83.3 vs 91.1; Cost: 52.0 vs 59.5.50100Intelligence: Jev 1.13.0: 53.1; JevK5 v0.2.0: 48.9Intelligence53.1 · 48.9Calibration: Jev 1.13.0: 76.3; JevK5 v0.2.0: 74.5Calibration76.3 · 74.5Speed: Jev 1.13.0: 83.3; JevK5 v0.2.0: 91.1Speed83.3 · 91.1Cost: Jev 1.13.0: 52.0; JevK5 v0.2.0: 59.5Cost52.0 · 59.5
0–100, the values in the table. A label-only system has no calibration: it counts as 0 in the score and is left as a gap on the radar.

Accuracy per tier, incl. sealed

Radar: accuracy per tier, incl. sealed, two systemsAccuracy per tier, incl. sealed, Jev 1.13.0 vs JevK5 v0.2.0. Easy: 100% vs 100%; Standard: 99% vs 96%; Judge: 95% vs 95%; Hard: 74% vs 70%; Sealed: 37% vs 33%.50100Easy: Jev 1.13.0: 100%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 100%Easy100% · 100%Standard: Jev 1.13.0: 99%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 96%Standard99% · 96%Judge: Jev 1.13.0: 95%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 95%Judge95% · 95%Hard: Jev 1.13.0: 74%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 70%Hard74% · 70%Sealed: Jev 1.13.0: 37%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 33%Sealed37% · 33%
Share correct per tier; Sealed = the 308 private decisions, aggregate only.

Hard tier by family (v1.2 topics)

Radar: hard tier by family (v1.2 topics), two systemsHard tier by family (v1.2 topics), Jev 1.13.0 vs JevK5 v0.2.0. Adversarial: 100% vs 92%; Ambiguous: 79% vs 79%; Judge: 79% vs 82%; Long policy: 61% vs 50%; Multi-hop: 86% vs 77%; Probability: 80% vs 60%; Routing: 100% vs 100%; Temporal / numeric: 27% vs 37%; Trade-off: 92% vs 83%; Trap: 100% vs 100%.50100Adversarial: Jev 1.13.0: 100%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 92%Adversarial100% · 92%Ambiguous: Jev 1.13.0: 79%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 79%Ambiguous79% · 79%Judge: Jev 1.13.0: 79%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 82%Judge79% · 82%Long policy: Jev 1.13.0: 61%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 50%Long policy61% · 50%Multi-hop: Jev 1.13.0: 86%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 77%Multi-hop86% · 77%Probability: Jev 1.13.0: 80%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 60%Probability80% · 60%Routing: Jev 1.13.0: 100%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 100%Routing100% · 100%Temporal / numeric: Jev 1.13.0: 27%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 37%Temporal /numeric27% · 37%Trade-off: Jev 1.13.0: 92%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 83%Trade-off92% · 83%Trap: Jev 1.13.0: 100%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 100%Trap100% · 100%
Share correct within each family of the 220 v1.2 hard-tier decisions (public and held-out).

Sealed set by family

Radar: sealed set by family, two systemsSealed set by family, Jev 1.13.0 vs JevK5 v0.2.0. Ambiguous / abstain: 30% vs 43%; Judge: 34% vs 37%; Long policy: 28% vs 23%; Multi-hop: 45% vs 39%; Paraphrase: 64% vs 14%; Probability: 50% vs 39%; Safety judge: 38% vs 38%; Temporal / numeric: 29% vs 27%; Trade-off: 38% vs 23%; Trap / adversarial: 42% vs 58%.50100Ambiguous / abstain: Jev 1.13.0: 30%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 43%Ambiguous /abstain30% · 43%Judge: Jev 1.13.0: 34%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 37%Judge34% · 37%Long policy: Jev 1.13.0: 28%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 23%Long policy28% · 23%Multi-hop: Jev 1.13.0: 45%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 39%Multi-hop45% · 39%Paraphrase: Jev 1.13.0: 64%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 14%Paraphrase64% · 14%Probability: Jev 1.13.0: 50%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 39%Probability50% · 39%Safety judge: Jev 1.13.0: 38%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 38%Safety judge38% · 38%Temporal / numeric: Jev 1.13.0: 29%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 27%Temporal /numeric29% · 27%Trade-off: Jev 1.13.0: 38%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 23%Trade-off38% · 23%Trap / adversarial: Jev 1.13.0: 42%; JevK5 v0.2.0: 58%Trap /adversarial42% · 58%
Share correct within each sealed family — system-level aggregates; the items stay private.
All values as a table
SpokeA: Jev 1.13.0B: JevK5 v0.2.0
The four score axes
Intelligence53.148.9
Calibration76.374.5
Speed83.391.1
Cost52.059.5
Accuracy per tier, incl. sealed
Easy100%100%
Standard99%96%
Judge95%95%
Hard74%70%
Sealed37%33%
Hard tier by family (v1.2 topics)
Adversarial100%92%
Ambiguous79%79%
Judge79%82%
Long policy61%50%
Multi-hop86%77%
Probability80%60%
Routing100%100%
Temporal / numeric27%37%
Trade-off92%83%
Trap100%100%
Sealed set by family
Ambiguous / abstain30%43%
Judge34%37%
Long policy28%23%
Multi-hop45%39%
Paraphrase64%14%
Probability50%39%
Safety judge38%38%
Temporal / numeric29%27%
Trade-off38%23%
Trap / adversarial42%58%

Axes, accuracy, latency and cost

Every system with its four axes, public and sealed accuracy and the gap between them. Click a column heading to sort; filter by name, type, openness, API flag. On a phone the name column stays put while the table scrolls sideways. † = a note on that system — tap it to read.

Greener = stronger within its column; faster counts as stronger. Badges: API sealed text went to the operator's endpoint · est. estimated price · ann. announced price not yet bookable · not ranked partial run or honorable mention.

* Self-hosted rows: the first value is the p50 we measured on our own hardware over loopback (on-GPU, or on-CPU where marked, no network). It is not directly comparable with API latency, which we time end to end from our measuring host, network included. “est.” is the est. incl. network (2x + 150 ms) that the ranking and the latency cap use for every self-hosted row. Model authors can ask us to time a hosted endpoint instead (on request).

1
Jev 1.13.0APIby TypeSafe AI · detailsJev referenceBase model: undisclosed
63.353.176.383.352.086.6%36.7%+49.9 pp$0.0400.65 sAPI
2
JevK5 v0.2.0
†Author says no JevBench items or outputs were used for training, tuning, or selection; public results are reported. Scan found only one generic instruction shared by 8 public hard items; unreleased teacher/replay corpora were unavailable.
by allebee · detailsadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource
62.048.974.591.159.585.3%33.1%+52.2 ppest.$0.022—unknown
3
Hopper
†Author discloses heavy public-benchmark-directed development (26 model/prompt configs, 20+ calibration-map variants observed against the public half); scan of 17 released files vs 231 public tasks found 0 state/instruction matches; training corpus not released so overlap not independently verifiable.
by HopitAI · detailsadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource
59.448.079.186.858.782.3%34.1%+48.2 ppest.$0.0240.129 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.41 s*RunPod GPU
4
Winnow-12B Q8
†The submitted Q8_0 GGUF ran through the pinned author's TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone server with 8,192 context, four resident decision branches, Q8 KV, and full GPU offload. The private training corpus was not released. The author's checksum-based audit reports zero exact public-item overlap, but that claim cannot be independently reproduced; our scan found no exact public state or instruction text in the released artifacts. Cost uses the $0.05/M-input hosted Gemma 3 12B reference, not free/100.
by Eldan Ring · detailsmerge · 12B · GGUF Q8_0Base model: google/gemma-4-12B-itsource
55.648.364.882.352.985.7%33.1%+52.6 ppest.$0.0370.225 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.60 s*RunPod GPU
5
reflex 4B
†The author's reflex-serve: Qwen3.5-4B with the published LoRA and its per-primitive calibration file; the state is encoded once and each question read from the label logits. Run serially on our GPU; the author discloses that the 231 public items were used four times as a development gate.
by kshetrajna12 · detailsadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource
54.047.570.468.059.779.2%28.2%+51.0 ppest.$0.0221.800 son-GPU, no networkest. 3.75 s*RunPod GPU
6
djev
†The measured endpoint was Maisa's hosted API in free preview; the cost uses its announced price ($0.035 per million input tokens, output free), and nothing was charged. The self-hostable djev-dev runtime is Apache-2.0 and applies a structured one-step inference method to Google's Apache-2.0 diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it checkpoint; it adds no separately trained djev weights. Probabilities are djev's own (its docs call them experimental and uncalibrated). v1.4: hosted api.djev.dev was paused by its operator ("Serving is paused by the administrator"); sealed tier measured on the public djev runtime (Davipar/djev-dev 3ce907e, same weights, default mode) self-hosted on an H100; Speed/Cost kept from v1.3.
by Maisa (David Villalón) · Maisa, diffusion-gemma · details26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource
52.247.055.491.457.684.0%29.9%+54.1 ppann.$0.0260.24 sAPI
7
Jev-Omni
†Akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni revision c050d51354147985d13286cf4acf90f562f2c631, the author's own load_model.py (merged text decision model + 256-way head) and his own predict(), transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image; built on the CPU and moved to CUDA with every nn.Linear weight cast to bfloat16 first - the same cast his reference loader jev_omni.py applies - because our 46 GB GPU cannot hold his fp32 copy; on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by akhilaaa3 · akhilaaa3, Gemma-4-12B merged · detailsfine-tuneBase model: google/gemma-4-12B-itsource
51.346.864.181.553.088.7%32.1%+56.6 ppest.$0.0370.217 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.58 s*RunPod GPU
8
metask-jev-4b
†Model card discloses 44.8k+16.1k+390 training rows incl. synthetic families intentionally mirroring JevBench hard families, plus repeated evaluation on all 231 public items (benchmark-directed development disclosed). Scan of 61 files: 0 exact matches.
by Wayfind (metask-ai) · details4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource
47.844.766.989.154.579.7%27.6%+52.1 ppest.$0.0330.066 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.28 s*RunPod GPU
9
SemIfby Theodore Lee (TheoLeeCJ) · formerly OpenJev (Qwen3.5-4B, TheoLeeCJ · details4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource
47.744.466.883.759.581.0%26.3%+54.7 ppest.$0.0220.198 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.55 s*RunPod GPU
10
Jobe Qwen3.5-4B
†No trained weights/LoRA/calibration fit; release explicitly rejects fitted temperature/order averaging. Scan of 37 files vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches.
by MantisShrimpdev · frozen · details4BBase model: undisclosed · No verified public base-model disclosure recorded for this unmeasured evaluated variant.
46.944.166.185.659.581.0%25.6%+55.3 ppest.$0.0220.135 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.42 s*RunPod GPU
11
local-jev Qwen3.5-4B
†Scan of 72 files: 0 matches. Author discloses choosing JSON layout after observing results on the 231 public items (benchmark-directed choice, disclosed).
by Amith Chandrappa (amithgc) · detailsfine-tune · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-4Bsource
46.844.473.375.055.880.5%26.0%+54.5 ppest.$0.0300.708 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.57 s*RunPod GPU
12
system-one-openAPIby mithalouni · Gemma 4 E2B LoRA on an L4 · detailsadapter · 2BBase model: Gemma 4 E2Bsource
45.144.254.977.064.873.2%27.6%+45.6 ppest.$0.0150.65 sauthor demo
13
spark-s1-4b-v6
†Abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6 revision 93d49ddbfb29212e3296635a75a3e80cf69da027, code github.com/abhishek085/open-spark-jev 30ac6d89b7fa36c644cf86aac68f35c1d276a919, the author's own MenuScorer.decide with his fitted calibration.json temperature, bf16, base Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B, transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2 installed, causal_conv1d not installable here (no wheel builds against this toolchain), on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Abhishek Rai (abhishek085) · Open Spark Jev, abhishek085 · detailsadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource
44.645.147.681.057.979.2%26.6%+52.6 ppest.$0.0250.314 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.78 s*RunPod GPU
14
jqv
†A stock Qwen3-32B with no decision training: the state is prefilled once, each question is an isolated branch and the answer is read from the option-letter logits, with one fitted temperature (3.02, 400 MMLU validation items). Re-run in v1.2.8 on our own GPU from the now-public serving code (Octalab-Inc/jqv 0189b67), so all 534 decisions including the held-out hard items were asked; this full run replaces the v1.2.7 partial row, which had been measured on the submitter's machine. Cost is the base model's public per-token tariff, not free.
by hjmurmur (Octalab) · Qwen3-32B zero-shot · details32BBase model: Qwen3-32Bsource
44.446.471.674.647.580.1%28.2%+51.8 ppest.$0.0560.747 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.64 s*RunPod GPU
15
Qwen3-Reranker-4B
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Qwen · detailsRerankerBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Basesource
43.544.665.278.749.268.0%29.9%+38.1 pp$0.0500.130 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.41 s*RunPod GPU
16
decider-35b-a3b
†The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published FP8 weights, run serially on our H100 NVL. The exhaustive startup batch warmup was skipped; each required serial shape captured lazily before its measured request. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the closest hosted 35B-A3B input tariff and is not the temporary rental charge.
by Mapika · detailsfine-tune · 35B-A3BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Basesource
41.247.265.380.845.383.1%31.5%+51.6 ppest.$0.0670.292 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.73 s*RunPod GPU
17
Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · detailsoriginal · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (unmodified)source
41.046.429.187.659.769.7%27.3%+42.4 ppest.$0.0220.082 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.31 s*RunPod GPU
18
OpenSourceJev
†DM submission, measure-only (JevBench publishing HOLD in force). Same author as the existing simplejev-qwen3.5-0.8b row (sabeel111/Featherless AI). Round-4 audit of an earlier commit could not be measured (no public GGUF, Windows-only DLL loader, unpinned llama.cpp build); this round the author published the exact unsloth Q4_K_M GGUF (hash/size independently verified) and we built llama.cpp CUDA from current upstream master on Linux ourselves -- its ABI matched the ctypes bindings exactly, so only a loader file-naming fix was needed (documented diff), no code/scoring/calibration change. Our public-231 subset exactly reproduced the author-reported table: easy 48/48, standard 67/72, hard 66/111, schema 231/231. Calibration (noul temperature) fit only on Google BoolQ, not JevBench. Repo docs name 3 public task IDs while describing benchmark-directed algorithm fixes on the public half (disclosed); 0 exact state/instruction text matches in a released-file scan.
by sabeel111 · Qwen3.5-4B Q4_K_M, native llama.cpp · detailsadapter · 4B · GGUF Q4_K_MBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource
40.941.860.382.064.078.4%26.3%+52.1 ppest.$0.016—unknown
19
ZeroEntropy zerank-2
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by ZeroEntropy · detailsRerankerBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4Bsource
40.242.175.879.049.870.1%28.6%+41.6 pp$0.0470.127 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.40 s*RunPod GPU
20
decision-machine-1
†A closed-weights decision model behind a production API that serves TypeSafe's wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it. Run on a free test key (30 requests a minute, 2.2 s between requests); the provider states the inference infrastructure is the same as for paid keys. Cost is the public paid tariff, $0.04 per million input tokens (output free), times the input tokens the API reported.
APIby milliseconds.ai (Baptiste Laget) · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
39.941.368.392.953.767.5%25.6%+41.9 pp$0.0350.17 sAPI
21
Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control, not JevBench-directed.
by Microsoft / neutral reproduction · detailsoriginalBase model: microsoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct (unmodified)source
38.041.858.888.849.665.8%29.2%+36.6 ppest.$0.0480.064 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.28 s*RunPod GPU
22
JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4
†Byte-identical to upstream March-2026 NVFP4 checkpoint, predates JevBench v1.2, no task-specific training added. Had 3 preliminary scope/policy scoring errors corrected during review (pooled-ECE, full-run latency, cost estimate); score above is final corrected value.
by WilfLin · details9B · NVFP4Base model: ig1/Qwen3.5-9B-NVFP4source
37.746.867.793.343.375.3%29.5%+45.8 ppest.$0.0770.020 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.19 s*RunPod GPU
23
OpenJevby razorback16 / Codiv · DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16 · details26B-A4B · NVFP4Base model: undisclosed · No verified public base-model disclosure recorded for this unmeasured evaluated variant.
36.945.455.083.245.581.8%28.6%+53.2 ppest.$0.0660.241 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.63 s*RunPod GPU
24
kev 4B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 306/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · research preview · detailsadapter · 4BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Basesource · Evaluated Qwen3 variant; later releases use a different base.
36.142.139.675.761.866.2%22.4%+43.8 ppest.$0.0190.550 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.25 s*RunPod GPU
25
Decision 2B
†Flymy-ai/decision-2b-preview revision df57b75db927acc9ad91ec8115508c1e487086eb (checkpoint minicpm5_reduced_v16_4k_v59), base openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B revision 12a3808a956f869c767195e9266b59c4d21d92e2, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by FlyMy.AI (@denti) · FlyMy.AI, v59 · detailsadapter · 2BBase model: openbmb/MiniCPM5-2Bsource
35.838.874.184.362.575.3%26.0%+49.4 ppest.$0.0180.189 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.53 s*RunPod GPU
26
Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2
†The author disclosed development on the public JevBench set and public-result comparisons; released-data overlap scan found no matches, but 764 gap and 382 replay training rows are unreleased.
by jsaurabh · detailsadapter · 9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource
35.247.461.382.042.478.4%29.2%+49.1 ppest.$0.083—unknown
27
GPT-6 Luna
†OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort low; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
APIby OpenAI · low reasoning effort · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
35.195.892.073.736.999.1%92.9%+6.3 pp$0.1271.44 sAPI
28
SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B
†Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
APIby Featherless AI · details27BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-27Bsource
34.651.674.571.239.586.6%35.7%+50.9 ppest.$0.1041.01 sauthor demo
29
NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed
†Engine scan (1,758 files) vs 231 public tasks: 0 exact matches. Submitter discloses no training for Flash-Next but repeated consultation of public items and a public-hard temperature sweep.
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · detailsLLM decoderBase model: Qwen3.8-Flash-Nextsource
34.049.578.688.238.989.6%34.1%+55.5 ppest.$0.1090.079 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.31 s*RunPod GPU
30
GPT-6 Luna
†OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort default medium; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
APIby OpenAI · default medium reasoning effort · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
33.397.493.572.636.099.6%95.5%+4.1 pp$0.1351.48 sAPI
31
open-alternative-jev
†With the options in reverse order (A. no, B. yes) the same model scored 21 % instead of 72 % on yes/no answer-judging items — small models are very sensitive to option order.
by IkerMoel · Qwen3.5-4B, IkerMoel · details4BBase model: Qwen3.5-4Bsource
33.238.658.783.559.674.0%24.4%+49.7 ppest.$0.0220.207 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.56 s*RunPod GPU
32
jev-local
†The author's local Jev-compatible server in its default full configuration: a frozen Qwen3.5-9B scores each option by its mean log-probability (one forward pass per option, no generation, no decision training). Run serially on our GPU. It re-reads the state once per option; if its reported token count covers one pass only, a per-token hosted price would be higher than this estimate.
by us (GitHub) · Qwen3.5-9B · details9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource
32.545.264.269.243.374.9%29.5%+45.3 ppest.$0.0771.045 son-GPU, no networkest. 2.24 s*RunPod GPU
33
Decision Fast
†Flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview revision 4225d41c66119fe28e95a2631bb0103decae6d56 (checkpoint qwen3_06b_headfirst_ep2a_v53), base Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base revision da87bfb608c14b7cf20ba1ce41287e8de496c0cd, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by FlyMy.AI (@denti) · FlyMy.AI, v53a · detailsadapter · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource
32.537.165.381.676.163.2%25.6%+37.6 ppest.$0.00630.240 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.63 s*RunPod GPU
34
decider-2b
†The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published weights (Qwen3.5-2B-Base with a trained one-pass decision readout), run serially on our GPU. Self-host latency gets the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
by Mapika · detailsadapter · 2BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B-Basesource
30.738.543.583.261.071.0%24.7%+46.3 ppest.$0.0200.261 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.67 s*RunPod GPU
35
jeff
†Self-hosted from its GitHub repo with server defaults, on our CPU (the author recommends a GPU, e.g. an L4), through the same TypeSafe-compatible API as Jev.
by Logan Markewich · Logan Markewich, GLiFormer 400M · detailsEncoder / classifierBase model: undisclosedsource
30.636.867.963.576.662.8%33.1%+29.7 ppest.$0.00600.938 son-CPU, no networkest. 2.03 s*CPU
36
Laya
†The English checkpoint (repo root), run on our CPU through its own `laya` package. Its budget is 512 tokens per question, so long hard-tier states are cut by the package itself.
by Convai Innovations · Convai Innovations, ModernBERT-large 421M · detailsfine-tune · 421MBase model: ModernBERT-largesource
30.336.163.771.186.258.4%30.8%+27.6 ppest.$0.00290.787 son-CPU, no networkest. 1.72 s*CPU
37
lev-350m
†Weights franckverrot/lev-350m revision ab08ad8b8f346994d983152917e114224f6adac7, code github.com/franckverrot/lev c48a945dbf629998d7458dcc5c16f58df964db94, the author's own lev.serve /v1/systemone endpoint with its shipped calibration temperature, base LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Franck Verrot (franckverrot) · Franck Verrot, LFM2.5-350M · detailsadapterBase model: LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350Msource
28.534.870.685.376.158.4%25.0%+33.4 ppest.$0.00630.172 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.49 s*RunPod GPU
38
openjev-sglangAPIby ekzhang · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on SGLang · details35B-A3BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3Bsource
27.749.469.277.136.585.3%33.1%+52.2 ppest.$0.1310.68 sauthor demo
39
Von
†The author disclosed that its temperature calibration map used the 231 public JevBench items; monotonic scaling does not change accuracy. Estimated cost is USD 0.00551 per 1,000 decisions.
by wfzyx (Victor Hugo) · wfzyx, Option-Marker 395M · detailsfine-tune · 395MBase model: answerdotai/ModernBERT-largesource
27.534.575.770.577.857.1%27.9%+29.2 ppest.$0.0055—unknown
40
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4
†T=1.5 is an offline recomputation from raw logits of the same run, not a second execution. T=1.5 was chosen by sweeping public hard items (development-set calibrated, disclosed).
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · T=1.5 · details27BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource
26.951.576.080.135.283.1%33.1%+50.0 ppest.$0.1450.368 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.89 s*RunPod GPU
41
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4
†Raw T=1.0 row. Author discloses repeated public-item consultation and public-hard tuning (applies to both NInfer 27B rows).
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · details27BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource
26.351.567.280.135.283.1%33.1%+50.0 ppest.$0.1450.368 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.89 s*RunPod GPU
42
kev 8B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview.
by Jared Palmer · research preview · detailsadapter · 8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Basesource
25.641.840.274.944.071.4%21.8%+49.7 ppest.$0.0730.590 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.33 s*RunPod GPU
43
JevOne
†Scan vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches. Training corpus/provenance not disclosed — overlap unknown.
by Juspay · detailsadapterBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3Bsource
25.547.677.688.535.989.6%33.8%+55.8 ppest.$0.1370.087 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.32 s*RunPod GPU
44
SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
†Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
APIby Featherless AI · details35B-A3BBase model: undisclosedsource
24.945.759.875.038.181.4%28.2%+53.1 ppest.$0.1160.85 sauthor demo
45
kev 0.6B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · research preview · detailsadapter · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource
24.834.250.075.676.166.7%24.0%+42.6 ppest.$0.00630.590 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.33 s*RunPod GPU
46
Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · detailsoriginal · 8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B-Basesource
23.745.724.186.341.968.4%26.3%+42.1 ppest.$0.0870.085 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.32 s*RunPod GPU
47
system-oneby Sean Goedecke · Qwen3-8B, Sean Goedecke · details8BBase model: Qwen3-8Bsource
23.443.632.884.441.571.9%24.4%+47.5 ppest.$0.0890.166 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.48 s*RunPod GPU
48
OpenDecision
†A zero-shot NLI classifier behind a TypeSafe-compatible server, not a trained decision model: it scores each option as an entailment hypothesis with ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0. Its choice path runs several NLI passes over the same state, which the reported token count does not include, so a per-token hosted price would be higher than the estimate here. Pre-registered for our CPU in v1.2.7, run on our GPU because the CPU was far too slow.
by Deepan Wadhwa · ModernBERT-large zero-shot · detailsEncoder / classifierBase model: MoritzLaurer/ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0source
21.631.857.179.975.353.2%25.6%+27.6 ppest.$0.00660.338 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.83 s*RunPod GPU
49
LitJev
†The author's reproduction of Jev's decision layer on an off-the-shelf model, in its default configuration: Qwen3.8-27B, scores read from the output head, no training and no calibration file (its README says probabilities are not calibrated by default). Run serially on our GPU through an SSH tunnel, because its server binds to localhost; the request still crosses the internet and gets the ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
by Zhengxu Yu · Qwen3.8-27B · details27BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.8-27Bsource
19.546.376.666.733.686.1%30.8%+55.3 ppest.$0.1632.025 son-GPU, no networkest. 4.20 s*RunPod GPU
50
openJev Verdict 1.4
†Same public weights as the earlier Verdict row, run through the author's fixed v1.4 engine. That engine auto-loads the calibrator for every option count, frames candidate labels as NLI sentences and uses a 512-token context budget. Run locally on our CPU, serially.
by Hemant (heman10x) · detailsEncoder / classifierBase model: knowledgator/gliclass-modern-base-v2.0source
19.029.472.078.182.457.6%27.9%+29.7 ppest.$0.00390.314 son-CPU, no networkest. 0.78 s*CPU
51
kev 0.5B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. This is the v0.1 release. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · detailsadapter · 0.5BBase model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5Bsource
18.930.549.777.076.149.4%27.3%+22.1 ppest.$0.00630.430 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.01 s*RunPod GPU
52
Bespoke Nimble 9B
†Re-run in v1.2.8 at Bespoke Labs' request after they raised the serving prompt limit from 2,048 to 8,192 tokens (bespokelabsai/nimble PR #4). Same recipe as the v1.1.3 run — the published LoRA merged into Qwen3.5-9B with the author's PEFT safe-merge, served with SGLang and the author's Jev-compatible API — now from current nimble main; the adapter weights are unchanged. Hard-tier accuracy rose from 43.6 % to 65.5 %, yet the score fell: the long hard items that used to fail at once are now answered and priced (so Cost fell), and this pod was in Canada while the v1.1.3 run's was in Sweden, so part of the lower Speed is network distance from our server in Germany. This complete run replaces the earlier row; its old score is kept in the artifact under superseded_rows.
by Bespoke Labs · detailsadapter · 9BBase model: Qwen3.5-9Bsource
18.746.356.478.733.479.7%28.9%+50.8 ppest.$0.1660.389 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.93 s*RunPod GPU
53
GPT-5.6 LunaAPIby OpenAI · low reasoning effort · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
18.593.187.477.528.597.4%89.0%+8.4 pp$0.2420.97 sAPI
54
openJev Verdict
†The openJev-verdict-2.0 Hugging Face repo ships no weights; its config is byte-identical to heman10x/rlcd-modernbert-151m, whose published weights we ran with the author's engine. The 'verdict2-base' checkpoint behind the README's numbers is not downloadable yet (Git LFS 404); we will run it once it is.
by Hemant (heman10x) · heman10x, ModernBERT-base 151M · detailsfine-tuneBase model: knowledgator/gliclass-modern-base-v2.0source 1source 2
18.130.047.076.783.155.4%24.7%+30.7 ppest.$0.00370.278 son-CPU, no networkest. 0.71 s*CPU
55
Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · detailsoriginal · 1.7BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B-Basesource
18.133.224.389.764.954.1%26.0%+28.1 ppest.$0.0150.067 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.28 s*RunPod GPU
56
reflex-27b
†The frozen public Qwen3.8-27B checkpoint through reflex at the requested pinned commit, with two option orders averaged and temperature 1. No adapter or fitted calibration file. Run serially on our H100 NVL. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment; cost uses the exact base model's public hosted input tariff.
by kshetrajna12 · Qwen3.8-27B · details27BBase model: Qwen3.8-27Bsource
17.846.477.267.532.387.0%29.5%+57.5 ppest.$0.1811.888 son-GPU, no networkest. 3.93 s*RunPod GPU
57
djev
†Experimental full-generation path over the same DiffusionGemma checkpoint as djev-dev: thinking was enabled and the model could generate up to 8,192 tokens before returning its distribution. Current djev-dev itself hard-codes enable_thinking=false, diffusion_max_steps=1 and read_only=true, so this is not a switch in its published typed API. It is substantially slower/costlier, and 72/534 requests exhausted the output budget without a parseable distribution; those are failures. Cost uses measured tokens and a same-size hosted reference, not the H200 rental bill. 220/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by David Villalon / Maisa · thinking · details26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource
15.271.687.875.226.987.4%60.1%+27.4 ppest.$0.2740.426 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.00 s*RunPod GPU
58
GLiNER2 large
†The large checkpoint of Fastino's earlier GLiNER2 family, same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
by Fastino · detailsfine-tuneBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-largesource
15.131.124.861.773.356.7%28.6%+28.1 ppest.$0.00771.097 son-CPU, no networkest. 2.34 s*CPU
59
OpenJev
†OpenJev's real typed-API thinking switch at think=512, using its own /v1/systemone server over BF16 DiffusionGemma. The thought is generated first, then native probability reads are taken after it. All 534 requests returned valid distributions. Cost counts the server's billed input and thought output tokens.
by razorback16 · thinking, BF16 · details26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource 1source 2
14.858.158.176.127.888.7%42.2%+46.5 ppest.$0.2550.463 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.08 s*RunPod GPU
60
Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model
†JevLite SystemOne on CPU; bundled per-question calibration; no operator endpoint or network access. Local CPU measurement on the existing 534-decision v1.3 set plus 308 sealed v1.4 decisions; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Mourad Ghafiri · detailsfine-tune · 0.8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Basesource
14.528.168.249.275.759.3%34.7%+24.6 ppest.$0.00657.150 son-CPU, no networkest. 14.45 s*CPU
61
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
†307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
APIby Google · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
14.354.559.381.827.487.0%38.6%+48.4 pp$0.2640.76 sAPI
62
open-jev-deberta-v3-large
†297/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Kotoba Labs · local CPU · detailsadapterBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-largesource
12.625.666.666.074.052.4%29.5%+22.8 ppest.$0.00731.768 son-CPU, no networkest. 3.69 s*CPU
63
smalljev semantic-v9
†The public semantic-v9 LoRA and native heads over MiniCPM5-2B-Base, through the mapping frozen before the run. It has a typed Python contract but no TypeSafe-compatible HTTP route. The released training recipe explicitly hill-climbed against JevBench's public shape and source families; this allowed public benchmark-directed development is disclosed. Cost is $0.04/M measured input tokens, not free/100.
by Aditya (isHeSatoshi) · detailsadapter · 2BBase model: openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B-Basesource
12.325.759.279.857.960.6%26.9%+33.7 ppest.$0.0250.414 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.98 s*RunPod GPU
64
GLiNER2
†A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild. The question goes in front of the text; the probabilities are GLiNER2's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full (mapping fixed before the run).
by Fastino · Fastino, gliner2.5-base · detailsadapterBase model: DeBERTa-v3-basesource
11.827.425.271.883.158.0%29.2%+28.8 ppest.$0.00370.313 son-CPU, no networkest. 0.78 s*CPU
65
Open-Jev 9B
†The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
by Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai) · detailsadapter · 9BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9Bsource
11.244.261.872.028.177.5%29.9%+47.6 ppest.$0.2490.755 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.66 s*RunPod GPU
66
Open-Jev 2B
†The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
by Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai) · detailsadapter · 2BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-2Bsource
10.042.355.373.528.164.5%26.3%+38.2 ppest.$0.2490.665 son-GPU, no networkest. 1.48 s*RunPod GPU
67
GLiNER2.5 multi
†The multilingual GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (287M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row. JevBench items are English only, so its multilingual training is not exercised here.
by Fastino · Fastino, 287M · detailsfine-tune · 287MBase model: mDeBERTa-v3-basesource
9.823.157.267.882.448.9%32.8%+16.1 ppest.$0.00390.428 son-CPU, no networkest. 1.01 s*CPU
68
SimpleJev
†143 pinned files scanned: 0 exact matches. No JevBench-specific fine-tuning.
by sabeel111 / Featherless AI · Qwen3.5-0.8B, CPU · details0.8BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8Bsource
7.521.549.157.568.354.5%34.7%+19.8 ppest.$0.0113.994 son-CPU, no networkest. 8.14 s*CPU
69
GLiNER2.5 small
†The small GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (74M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
by Fastino · Fastino, 74M · detailsfine-tune · 74MBase model: microsoft/deberta-v3-xsmallsource
7.220.550.777.882.445.9%28.6%+17.3 ppest.$0.00390.114 son-CPU, no networkest. 0.38 s*CPU
70
Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · detailsoriginal · 0.6BBase model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Basesource
7.122.820.789.973.948.1%25.6%+22.4 ppest.$0.00740.068 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.29 s*RunPod GPU
71
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
†298/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
APIby DeepSeek · thinking default · detailsLLM decoderBase model: undisclosed
4.894.095.571.616.897.8%94.8%+3.0 pp$0.5941.42 sAPI
72
Mirror
†171 intended HTTP 422 context rejections (over 512-token limit) counted once each as misses; only 363/534 valid distributions returned. Found via Gmail submission (Lewis). 102/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Bluusun · detailsEncoder / classifierBase model: undisclosed
2.113.626.070.873.341.1%9.1%+32.0 ppest.$0.00770.90 sauthor demo
73
Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Mixedbread · detailsRerankerBase model: Qwen2.5 (size not stated)source 1source 2
0.46.884.187.567.937.2%34.4%+2.8 pp$0.0120.069 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.29 s*RunPod GPU
74
BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by BAAI · detailsfine-tuneBase model: BAAI/bge-m3source
0.25.084.289.573.439.4%27.9%+11.5 pp$0.00770.035 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.22 s*RunPod GPU
75
Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Alibaba-NLP · detailsfine-tuneBase model: answerdotai/ModernBERT-basesource
0.24.878.990.669.633.8%33.4%+0.3 pp$0.0100.048 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.25 s*RunPod GPU
76
Certo v1
†The public Certo v1 checkpoint through the author's DecisionModel, serially on our rented GPU. The question instruction is prepended to the state because Certo exposes state + runtime options but no separate question field; the published 64-token state and 48-token option limits are unchanged. The model card says v1 does not yet transfer to arbitrary natural-language prose. Cost is an estimate from same-size hosted encoders times the checkpoint's retained input tokens, not free/100.
by AltSlate Labs · detailsEncoder / classifierBase model: ModernBERT-largesource
0.00.183.094.0100.031.6%29.5%+2.1 ppest.$0.00100.019 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.19 s*RunPod GPU
77
Open Jev JSON Canvas
†Returns only a final label, not a probability distribution — calibration counts as 0 in the composite. Scan of 39 files: 0 matches.
by JoshuaSP · details26B-A4BBase model: google/diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-itsource
0.048.20.084.145.684.4%31.2%+53.2 ppest.$0.0650.224 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.60 s*RunPod GPU
—
classifier.dev
†Its own benchmark page says the fast tier is Jev. Free for us; the price is its published Pro plan ($20/month for 200,000 fast classifications a day) at full use, $0.0033 per 1,000 decisions.
APIby mrmps (@michael_chomsky) · fast tier · detailsClosed APIBase model: undisclosed
honorable mention · not ranked
70.851.672.487.684.385.3%34.4%+50.9 ppest.$0.00330.39 sAPI
—
Qwen3.8 27B
†69/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong); partial: Chutes rate limit stopped the run after 81/308 items; unranked as in v1.3
APIby Qwen / Chutes · Chutes TEE · details27BBase model: undisclosed
partial · not ranked
0.040.493.661.30.071.9%21.8%+50.1 ppest.$2.6695.75 sAPI
—
swanOne
†Draft vocabulary derived via AGPL-3.0 generator (provenance recorded separately). Submitter consulted all 231 public tasks and swept temperature over 111 public hard tasks. Score corrected during review from pooled-534 ECE/latency to hard-tier/242-item block. v1.4: Not re-measured: needs its own H100 NVL pod (99 GiB weights); RunPod balance ran low during this job. Ready-to-run recipe kept.
by swanOne submitter · detailsNVFP4Base model: Mia-AiLab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4source
partial · not ranked
—————88.7%——est.$0.1110.337 son-GPU, no networkest. 0.82 s*RunPod GPU
—
Needle 3, options as tools
†V1.4: Not re-measured: same as needle-3.
by Cactus Compute · post-hoc adapter mode · detailsoriginal · 121MBase model: undisclosedsource
partial · not ranked
—————22.1%——est.$0.0143.779 son-CPU, no networkest. 7.71 s*CPU
—
Needle 3
†V1.4: Not re-measured: ~100-250 s per item on a rented CPU pod (19 s on Sandy); needs a dedicated CPU host.
by Cactus Compute · Cactus, 2-bit, local CPU · detailsoriginal · 121MBase model: undisclosedsource
partial · not ranked
—————22.5%——est.$0.0241.687 son-CPU, no networkest. 3.52 s*CPU

82 of 82 systems, sorted by official rank, #1 first.

API = the operator's endpoint received sealed item text during evaluation; the answers and item-level results are not published. The sealed text and answers remain private; only system-level aggregates appear here. Cost is per 1,000 decisions. Hover endpoint, cost and API labels for their recorded details.

All 75 system notes and disclosures
  • † JevK5 v0.2.0: Author says no JevBench items or outputs were used for training, tuning, or selection; public results are reported. Scan found only one generic instruction shared by 8 public hard items; unreleased teacher/replay corpora were unavailable.
  • † Hopper: Author discloses heavy public-benchmark-directed development (26 model/prompt configs, 20+ calibration-map variants observed against the public half); scan of 17 released files vs 231 public tasks found 0 state/instruction matches; training corpus not released so overlap not independently verifiable.
  • † Winnow-12B Q8: The submitted Q8_0 GGUF ran through the pinned author's TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone server with 8,192 context, four resident decision branches, Q8 KV, and full GPU offload. The private training corpus was not released. The author's checksum-based audit reports zero exact public-item overlap, but that claim cannot be independently reproduced; our scan found no exact public state or instruction text in the released artifacts. Cost uses the $0.05/M-input hosted Gemma 3 12B reference, not free/100.
  • † reflex 4B (kshetrajna12): The author's reflex-serve: Qwen3.5-4B with the published LoRA and its per-primitive calibration file; the state is encoded once and each question read from the label logits. Run serially on our GPU; the author discloses that the 231 public items were used four times as a development gate.
  • † djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma): The measured endpoint was Maisa's hosted API in free preview; the cost uses its announced price ($0.035 per million input tokens, output free), and nothing was charged. The self-hostable djev-dev runtime is Apache-2.0 and applies a structured one-step inference method to Google's Apache-2.0 diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it checkpoint; it adds no separately trained djev weights. Probabilities are djev's own (its docs call them experimental and uncalibrated). v1.4: hosted api.djev.dev was paused by its operator ("Serving is paused by the administrator"); sealed tier measured on the public djev runtime (Davipar/djev-dev 3ce907e, same weights, default mode) self-hosted on an H100; Speed/Cost kept from v1.3.
  • † Jev-Omni (akhilaaa3, Gemma-4-12B merged): Akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni revision c050d51354147985d13286cf4acf90f562f2c631, the author's own load_model.py (merged text decision model + 256-way head) and his own predict(), transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image; built on the CPU and moved to CUDA with every nn.Linear weight cast to bfloat16 first - the same cast his reference loader jev_omni.py applies - because our 46 GB GPU cannot hold his fp32 copy; on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † metask-jev-4b: Model card discloses 44.8k+16.1k+390 training rows incl. synthetic families intentionally mirroring JevBench hard families, plus repeated evaluation on all 231 public items (benchmark-directed development disclosed). Scan of 61 files: 0 exact matches.
  • † Jobe Qwen3.5-4B (frozen): No trained weights/LoRA/calibration fit; release explicitly rejects fitted temperature/order averaging. Scan of 37 files vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches.
  • † local-jev Qwen3.5-4B: Scan of 72 files: 0 matches. Author discloses choosing JSON layout after observing results on the 231 public items (benchmark-directed choice, disclosed).
  • † spark-s1-4b-v6 (Open Spark Jev, abhishek085): Abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6 revision 93d49ddbfb29212e3296635a75a3e80cf69da027, code github.com/abhishek085/open-spark-jev 30ac6d89b7fa36c644cf86aac68f35c1d276a919, the author's own MenuScorer.decide with his fitted calibration.json temperature, bf16, base Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B, transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2 installed, causal_conv1d not installable here (no wheel builds against this toolchain), on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † jqv (Qwen3-32B zero-shot): A stock Qwen3-32B with no decision training: the state is prefilled once, each question is an isolated branch and the answer is read from the option-letter logits, with one fitted temperature (3.02, 400 MMLU validation items). Re-run in v1.2.8 on our own GPU from the now-public serving code (Octalab-Inc/jqv 0189b67), so all 534 decisions including the held-out hard items were asked; this full run replaces the v1.2.7 partial row, which had been measured on the submitter's machine. Cost is the base model's public per-token tariff, not free.
  • † Qwen3-Reranker-4B: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † decider-35b-a3b (Mapika): The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published FP8 weights, run serially on our H100 NVL. The exhaustive startup batch warmup was skipped; each required serial shape captured lazily before its measured request. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the closest hosted 35B-A3B input tariff and is not the temporary rental charge.
  • † Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † OpenSourceJev (Qwen3.5-4B Q4_K_M, native llama.cpp): DM submission, measure-only (JevBench publishing HOLD in force). Same author as the existing simplejev-qwen3.5-0.8b row (sabeel111/Featherless AI). Round-4 audit of an earlier commit could not be measured (no public GGUF, Windows-only DLL loader, unpinned llama.cpp build); this round the author published the exact unsloth Q4_K_M GGUF (hash/size independently verified) and we built llama.cpp CUDA from current upstream master on Linux ourselves -- its ABI matched the ctypes bindings exactly, so only a loader file-naming fix was needed (documented diff), no code/scoring/calibration change. Our public-231 subset exactly reproduced the author-reported table: easy 48/48, standard 67/72, hard 66/111, schema 231/231. Calibration (noul temperature) fit only on Google BoolQ, not JevBench. Repo docs name 3 public task IDs while describing benchmark-directed algorithm fixes on the public half (disclosed); 0 exact state/instruction text matches in a released-file scan.
  • † ZeroEntropy zerank-2: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † decision-machine-1 (milliseconds.ai): A closed-weights decision model behind a production API that serves TypeSafe's wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it. Run on a free test key (30 requests a minute, 2.2 s between requests); the provider states the inference infrastructure is the same as for paid keys. Cost is the public paid tariff, $0.04 per million input tokens (output free), times the input tokens the API reported.
  • † Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control, not JevBench-directed.
  • † JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4: Byte-identical to upstream March-2026 NVFP4 checkpoint, predates JevBench v1.2, no task-specific training added. Had 3 preliminary scope/policy scoring errors corrected during review (pooled-ECE, full-run latency, cost estimate); score above is final corrected value.
  • † kev 4B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 306/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Decision 2B (FlyMy.AI, v59): Flymy-ai/decision-2b-preview revision df57b75db927acc9ad91ec8115508c1e487086eb (checkpoint minicpm5_reduced_v16_4k_v59), base openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B revision 12a3808a956f869c767195e9266b59c4d21d92e2, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2: The author disclosed development on the public JevBench set and public-result comparisons; released-data overlap scan found no matches, but 764 gap and 382 replay training rows are unreleased.
  • † GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort): OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort low; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
  • † SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B: Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed: Engine scan (1,758 files) vs 231 public tasks: 0 exact matches. Submitter discloses no training for Flash-Next but repeated consultation of public items and a public-hard temperature sweep.
  • † GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort): OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort default medium; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
  • † open-alternative-jev (Qwen3.5-4B, IkerMoel): With the options in reverse order (A. no, B. yes) the same model scored 21 % instead of 72 % on yes/no answer-judging items — small models are very sensitive to option order.
  • † jev-local (Qwen3.5-9B): The author's local Jev-compatible server in its default full configuration: a frozen Qwen3.5-9B scores each option by its mean log-probability (one forward pass per option, no generation, no decision training). Run serially on our GPU. It re-reads the state once per option; if its reported token count covers one pass only, a per-token hosted price would be higher than this estimate.
  • † Decision Fast (FlyMy.AI, v53a): Flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview revision 4225d41c66119fe28e95a2631bb0103decae6d56 (checkpoint qwen3_06b_headfirst_ep2a_v53), base Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base revision da87bfb608c14b7cf20ba1ce41287e8de496c0cd, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † decider-2b (Mapika): The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published weights (Qwen3.5-2B-Base with a trained one-pass decision readout), run serially on our GPU. Self-host latency gets the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
  • † jeff (Logan Markewich, GLiFormer 400M): Self-hosted from its GitHub repo with server defaults, on our CPU (the author recommends a GPU, e.g. an L4), through the same TypeSafe-compatible API as Jev.
  • † Laya (Convai Innovations, ModernBERT-large 421M): The English checkpoint (repo root), run on our CPU through its own `laya` package. Its budget is 512 tokens per question, so long hard-tier states are cut by the package itself.
  • † lev-350m (Franck Verrot, LFM2.5-350M): Weights franckverrot/lev-350m revision ab08ad8b8f346994d983152917e114224f6adac7, code github.com/franckverrot/lev c48a945dbf629998d7458dcc5c16f58df964db94, the author's own lev.serve /v1/systemone endpoint with its shipped calibration temperature, base LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Von (wfzyx, Option-Marker 395M): The author disclosed that its temperature calibration map used the 231 public JevBench items; monotonic scaling does not change accuracy. Estimated cost is USD 0.00551 per 1,000 decisions.
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5): T=1.5 is an offline recomputation from raw logits of the same run, not a second execution. T=1.5 was chosen by sweeping public hard items (development-set calibrated, disclosed).
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4: Raw T=1.0 row. Author discloses repeated public-item consultation and public-hard tuning (applies to both NInfer 27B rows).
  • † kev 8B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview.
  • † JevOne: Scan vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches. Training corpus/provenance not disclosed — overlap unknown.
  • † SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
  • † kev 0.6B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † OpenDecision (ModernBERT-large zero-shot): A zero-shot NLI classifier behind a TypeSafe-compatible server, not a trained decision model: it scores each option as an entailment hypothesis with ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0. Its choice path runs several NLI passes over the same state, which the reported token count does not include, so a per-token hosted price would be higher than the estimate here. Pre-registered for our CPU in v1.2.7, run on our GPU because the CPU was far too slow.
  • † LitJev (Qwen3.8-27B): The author's reproduction of Jev's decision layer on an off-the-shelf model, in its default configuration: Qwen3.8-27B, scores read from the output head, no training and no calibration file (its README says probabilities are not calibrated by default). Run serially on our GPU through an SSH tunnel, because its server binds to localhost; the request still crosses the internet and gets the ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
  • † openJev Verdict 1.4: Same public weights as the earlier Verdict row, run through the author's fixed v1.4 engine. That engine auto-loads the calibrator for every option count, frames candidate labels as NLI sentences and uses a 512-token context budget. Run locally on our CPU, serially.
  • † kev 0.5B: Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. This is the v0.1 release. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Bespoke Nimble 9B (Bespoke Labs): Re-run in v1.2.8 at Bespoke Labs' request after they raised the serving prompt limit from 2,048 to 8,192 tokens (bespokelabsai/nimble PR #4). Same recipe as the v1.1.3 run — the published LoRA merged into Qwen3.5-9B with the author's PEFT safe-merge, served with SGLang and the author's Jev-compatible API — now from current nimble main; the adapter weights are unchanged. Hard-tier accuracy rose from 43.6 % to 65.5 %, yet the score fell: the long hard items that used to fail at once are now answered and priced (so Cost fell), and this pod was in Canada while the v1.1.3 run's was in Sweden, so part of the lower Speed is network distance from our server in Germany. This complete run replaces the earlier row; its old score is kept in the artifact under superseded_rows.
  • † openJev Verdict (heman10x, ModernBERT-base 151M): The openJev-verdict-2.0 Hugging Face repo ships no weights; its config is byte-identical to heman10x/rlcd-modernbert-151m, whose published weights we ran with the author's engine. The 'verdict2-base' checkpoint behind the README's numbers is not downloadable yet (Git LFS 404); we will run it once it is.
  • † Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † reflex-27b (Qwen3.8-27B): The frozen public Qwen3.8-27B checkpoint through reflex at the requested pinned commit, with two option orders averaged and temperature 1. No adapter or fitted calibration file. Run serially on our H100 NVL. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment; cost uses the exact base model's public hosted input tariff.
  • † djev (thinking): Experimental full-generation path over the same DiffusionGemma checkpoint as djev-dev: thinking was enabled and the model could generate up to 8,192 tokens before returning its distribution. Current djev-dev itself hard-codes enable_thinking=false, diffusion_max_steps=1 and read_only=true, so this is not a switch in its published typed API. It is substantially slower/costlier, and 72/534 requests exhausted the output budget without a parseable distribution; those are failures. Cost uses measured tokens and a same-size hosted reference, not the H200 rental bill. 220/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † GLiNER2 large (Fastino): The large checkpoint of Fastino's earlier GLiNER2 family, same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
  • † OpenJev (thinking, BF16): OpenJev's real typed-API thinking switch at think=512, using its own /v1/systemone server over BF16 DiffusionGemma. The thought is generated first, then native probability reads are taken after it. All 534 requests returned valid distributions. Cost counts the server's billed input and thought output tokens.
  • † Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model (Mourad Ghafiri): JevLite SystemOne on CPU; bundled per-question calibration; no operator endpoint or network access. Local CPU measurement on the existing 534-decision v1.3 set plus 308 sealed v1.4 decisions; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † open-jev-deberta-v3-large (local CPU): 297/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † smalljev semantic-v9: The public semantic-v9 LoRA and native heads over MiniCPM5-2B-Base, through the mapping frozen before the run. It has a typed Python contract but no TypeSafe-compatible HTTP route. The released training recipe explicitly hill-climbed against JevBench's public shape and source families; this allowed public benchmark-directed development is disclosed. Cost is $0.04/M measured input tokens, not free/100.
  • † GLiNER2 (Fastino, gliner2.5-base): A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild. The question goes in front of the text; the probabilities are GLiNER2's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full (mapping fixed before the run).
  • † Open-Jev 9B (Zefan Cai): The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
  • † Open-Jev 2B (Zefan Cai): The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
  • † GLiNER2.5 multi (Fastino, 287M): The multilingual GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (287M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row. JevBench items are English only, so its multilingual training is not exercised here.
  • † SimpleJev (Qwen3.5-0.8B, CPU): 143 pinned files scanned: 0 exact matches. No JevBench-specific fine-tuning.
  • † GLiNER2.5 small (Fastino, 74M): The small GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (74M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
  • † Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (thinking default): 298/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Mirror: 171 intended HTTP 422 context rejections (over 512-token limit) counted once each as misses; only 363/534 valid distributions returned. Found via Gmail submission (Lewis). 102/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † Certo v1 (AltSlate Labs): The public Certo v1 checkpoint through the author's DecisionModel, serially on our rented GPU. The question instruction is prepended to the state because Certo exposes state + runtime options but no separate question field; the published 64-token state and 48-token option limits are unchanged. The model card says v1 does not yet transfer to arbitrary natural-language prose. Cost is an estimate from same-size hosted encoders times the checkpoint's retained input tokens, not free/100.
  • † Open Jev JSON Canvas (JoshuaSP): Returns only a final label, not a probability distribution — calibration counts as 0 in the composite. Scan of 39 files: 0 matches.
  • † classifier.dev (fast tier): Its own benchmark page says the fast tier is Jev. Free for us; the price is its published Pro plan ($20/month for 200,000 fast classifications a day) at full use, $0.0033 per 1,000 decisions.
  • † Qwen3.8 27B (Chutes TEE): 69/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong); partial: Chutes rate limit stopped the run after 81/308 items; unranked as in v1.3
  • † swanOne: Draft vocabulary derived via AGPL-3.0 generator (provenance recorded separately). Submitter consulted all 231 public tasks and swept temperature over 111 public hard tasks. Score corrected during review from pooled-534 ECE/latency to hard-tier/242-item block. v1.4: Not re-measured: needs its own H100 NVL pod (99 GiB weights); RunPod balance ran low during this job. Ready-to-run recipe kept.
  • † Needle 3, options as tools (post-hoc adapter mode): V1.4: Not re-measured: same as needle-3.
  • † Needle 3 (Cactus, 2-bit, local CPU): V1.4: Not re-measured: ~100-250 s per item on a rented CPU pod (19 s on Sandy); needs a dedicated CPU host.

Rows without a † have no note beyond the shared provenance: every row was measured or re-run with its recorded recipe, and deviations are in its run manifest.

Artifact: v1.4.1 results JSON · SHA-256 808909c4ecc8… · JevBench v1.4.1 release and method

What changed in v1.4

  • Fresh sealed decisions keep the benchmark moving as public items saturate. Sealed items contribute 20% of Intelligence: I = 0.8 × I_v1.3 + 0.2 × I_sealed, where I_sealed = 100 × max(0, (acc_sealed − 0.293) / (1 − 0.293)). Public and sealed scores are published only as aggregates.
  • Calibration blends toward the sealed-inclusive result at the approved weight: C = C_v1.3 + (C_v1.4 − C_v1.3) × min(1, 0.2 / 0.35).
  • The k = 1 generalization penalty reduces Intelligence when public accuracy exceeds sealed accuracy by more than 25 percentage points: I × (1 − max(0, gap − 25) / 100). It rewards systems that generalize beyond the public half.
  • The four axes use an equal-weight harmonic mean (p = −1). Intelligence below 50 keeps its quadratic penalty; Speed and Cost each have a separate Jev-class gate below 50. Speed and Cost axis calculations are unchanged from v1.3.0.
  • The visible API flag discloses when an operator endpoint received held-out item text, without answers. Existing system notes preserve disclosures such as Hopper's public-half development and JevK5's public-set selection.

JevBench v1.4.1 · additional views

Capability, cost and speed

Capability is the arithmetic mean of Intelligence and Calibration: (Intelligence + Calibration) / 2, on a 0–100 scale. Cost is USD per 1,000 decisions; its axis is logarithmic, and lower is better. Speed uses the JevBench Speed axis, where higher is faster. Estimated costs are marked.

3 placeholder rows have no published Intelligence or Calibration values and are omitted.

Top 20 by Capability

Capability with cost alongside

Each system has a wide Capability bar and a thin red cost line beneath it. The cost scale is logarithmic: a longer red line means higher cost, so shorter is cheaper.

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna (medium)API95.4Cost $0.14
  2. 2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAPI94.7Cost $0.59
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna (low)API93.9Cost $0.13
  4. 4GPT-5.6 LunaAPI90.3Cost $0.24
  5. 5djev79.7Cost $0.27 est.
  6. 6Qwen3.8 27BAPI67.0Cost $2.67 est.
  7. 7Jev 1.13.0API64.7Cost $0.040
  8. 8NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed64.1Cost $0.11 est.
  9. 9NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP463.7Cost $0.14 est.
  10. 10Hopper63.5Cost $0.024 est.
  11. 11SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27BAPI63.0Cost $0.10 est.
  12. 12JevOne62.6Cost $0.14 est.
  13. 13classifier.devAPI62.0Cost $0.0033 est.
  14. 14reflex-27b61.8Cost $0.18 est.
  15. 15JevK5 v0.2.061.7Cost $0.022 est.
  16. 16LitJev61.4Cost $0.16 est.
  17. 17openjev-sglangAPI59.3Cost $0.13 est.
  18. 18NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP459.3Cost $0.14 est.
  19. 19jqv59.0Cost $0.056 est.
  20. 20reflex 4B58.9Cost $0.022 est.
Show all 79 systems (59 more)
  1. 21ZeroEntropy zerank-258.9Cost $0.047
  2. 22local-jev Qwen3.5-4B58.9Cost $0.030 est.
  3. 23OpenJev58.1Cost $0.25 est.
  4. 24JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP457.3Cost $0.077 est.
  5. 25Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteAPI56.9Cost $0.26
  6. 26Winnow-12B Q856.6Cost $0.037 est.
  7. 27Decision 2B56.4Cost $0.018 est.
  8. 28decider-35b-a3b56.2Cost $0.067 est.
  9. 29metask-jev-4b55.8Cost $0.033 est.
  10. 30SemIf55.6Cost $0.022 est.
  11. 31Jev-Omni55.4Cost $0.037 est.
  12. 32Von55.1Cost $0.0055 est.
  13. 33Jobe Qwen3.5-4B55.1Cost $0.022 est.
  14. 34Qwen3-Reranker-4B54.9Cost $0.050
  15. 35decision-machine-1API54.8Cost $0.035
  16. 36jev-local54.7Cost $0.077 est.
  17. 37Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v254.4Cost $0.083 est.
  18. 38Open-Jev 9B53.0Cost $0.25 est.
  19. 39SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAPI52.8Cost $0.12 est.
  20. 40lev-350m52.7Cost $0.0063 est.
  21. 41jeff52.3Cost $0.0060 est.
  22. 42Bespoke Nimble 9B51.4Cost $0.17 est.
  23. 43Decision Fast51.2Cost $0.0063 est.
  24. 44djev51.2Cost $0.026
  25. 45OpenSourceJev51.1Cost $0.016 est.
  26. 46openJev Verdict 1.450.7Cost $0.0039 est.
  27. 47Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits50.3Cost $0.048 est.
  28. 48OpenJev50.2Cost $0.066 est.
  29. 49Laya49.9Cost $0.0029 est.
  30. 50system-one-openAPI49.5Cost $0.015 est.
  31. 51Open-Jev 2B48.8Cost $0.25 est.
  32. 52open-alternative-jev48.6Cost $0.022 est.
  33. 53Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model48.2Cost $0.0065 est.
  34. 54spark-s1-4b-v646.3Cost $0.025 est.
  35. 55open-jev-deberta-v3-large46.1Cost $0.0073 est.
  36. 56Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v245.5Cost $0.012
  37. 57BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m344.6Cost $0.0077
  38. 58OpenDecision44.4Cost $0.0066 est.
  39. 59smalljev semantic-v942.4Cost $0.025 est.
  40. 60kev 0.6B42.1Cost $0.0063 est.
  41. 61Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base41.9Cost $0.010
  42. 62Certo v141.5Cost $0.00097 est.
  43. 63decider-2b41.0Cost $0.020 est.
  44. 64kev 8B41.0Cost $0.073 est.
  45. 65kev 4B40.9Cost $0.019 est.
  46. 66GLiNER2.5 multi40.1Cost $0.0039 est.
  47. 67kev 0.5B40.1Cost $0.0063 est.
  48. 68openJev Verdict38.5Cost $0.0037 est.
  49. 69system-one38.2Cost $0.089 est.
  50. 70Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits37.7Cost $0.022 est.
  51. 71GLiNER2.5 small35.6Cost $0.0039 est.
  52. 72SimpleJev35.3Cost $0.011 est.
  53. 73Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits34.9Cost $0.087 est.
  54. 74Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits28.8Cost $0.015 est.
  55. 75GLiNER2 large28.0Cost $0.0077 est.
  56. 76GLiNER226.3Cost $0.0037 est.
  57. 77Open Jev JSON Canvas24.1Cost $0.065 est.
  58. 78Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits21.8Cost $0.0074 est.
  59. 79Mirror19.8Cost $0.0077 est.
Cost per 1,000 decisions · logarithmic · lower is better; free is at the left edge.
  • Jev — reference (TypeSafe, closed) (1)
  • Closed API (weights not public) (6)
  • Open weights · LLM decoder (44)
  • Open weights · diffusion LM (5)
  • Open weights · encoder / classifier (13)
  • Open weights · reranker (5)
  • Base model control (no decision fine-tune, raw logits) (5)
  • Cost per 1,000 decisions · log scale (thin red line)
Red cost lines use the scale printed under the bars, from $0.00097 to $2.67 per 1,000 decisions. Free cost is placed at the cheapest edge; missing cost is shown as —.

Capability vs cost

The upper-left is the more attractive area: higher Capability and lower cost.

Capability vs costThe upper-left is the more attractive area: higher Capability and lower cost. Each point has a tooltip with the system and its values.020406080100$0.0010$0.010$0.10$1.00USD per 1,000 decisions · log scale · cheaper ←Capability · higher ↑GPT-6 Luna (medium) · JevBench rank 30 · Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.6.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · JevBench rank 71 · Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.6.GPT-6 Luna (low) · JevBench rank 27 · Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.7.GPT-5.6 Luna · JevBench rank 53 · Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.5.djev · JevBench rank 57 · Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.2.Qwen3.8 27B · Capability 67.0 · Cost $2.67 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.3.Jev 1.13.0 · JevBench rank 1 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3.NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed · JevBench rank 29 · Capability 64.1 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.2.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 40 · Capability 63.7 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.Hopper · JevBench rank 3 · Capability 63.5 · Cost $0.024 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.8.SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B · JevBench rank 28 · Capability 63.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.2.JevOne · JevBench rank 43 · Capability 62.6 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.5.classifier.dev · Capability 62.0 · Cost $0.0033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.reflex-27b · JevBench rank 56 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.18 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.5.JevK5 v0.2.0 · JevBench rank 2 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1.LitJev · JevBench rank 49 · Capability 61.4 · Cost $0.16 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.7.openjev-sglang · JevBench rank 38 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.13 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.1.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 41 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.jqv · JevBench rank 14 · Capability 59.0 · Cost $0.056 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.6.reflex 4B · JevBench rank 5 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 68.0.ZeroEntropy zerank-2 · JevBench rank 19 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.047 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.0.local-jev Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 11 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.OpenJev · JevBench rank 59 · Capability 58.1 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.1.JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4 · JevBench rank 22 · Capability 57.3 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.3.Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · JevBench rank 61 · Capability 56.9 · Cost $0.26 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.8.Winnow-12B Q8 · JevBench rank 4 · Capability 56.6 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.3.Decision 2B · JevBench rank 25 · Capability 56.4 · Cost $0.018 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.3.decider-35b-a3b · JevBench rank 16 · Capability 56.2 · Cost $0.067 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.8.metask-jev-4b · JevBench rank 8 · Capability 55.8 · Cost $0.033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.1.SemIf · JevBench rank 9 · Capability 55.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.7.Jev-Omni · JevBench rank 7 · Capability 55.4 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.5.Von · JevBench rank 39 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.0055 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.5.Jobe Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 10 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.6.Qwen3-Reranker-4B · JevBench rank 15 · Capability 54.9 · Cost $0.050 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.decision-machine-1 · JevBench rank 20 · Capability 54.8 · Cost $0.035 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.jev-local · JevBench rank 32 · Capability 54.7 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 69.2.Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2 · JevBench rank 26 · Capability 54.4 · Cost $0.083 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.Open-Jev 9B · JevBench rank 65 · Capability 53.0 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.0.SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · JevBench rank 44 · Capability 52.8 · Cost $0.12 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.lev-350m · JevBench rank 37 · Capability 52.7 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.3.jeff · JevBench rank 35 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.0060 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 63.5.Bespoke Nimble 9B · JevBench rank 52 · Capability 51.4 · Cost $0.17 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.Decision Fast · JevBench rank 33 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.6.djev · JevBench rank 6 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.026 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.OpenSourceJev · JevBench rank 18 · Capability 51.1 · Cost $0.016 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.openJev Verdict 1.4 · JevBench rank 50 · Capability 50.7 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.1.Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits · JevBench rank 21 · Capability 50.3 · Cost $0.048 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.8.OpenJev · JevBench rank 23 · Capability 50.2 · Cost $0.066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.Laya · JevBench rank 36 · Capability 49.9 · Cost $0.0029 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.1.system-one-open · JevBench rank 12 · Capability 49.5 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.Open-Jev 2B · JevBench rank 66 · Capability 48.8 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.5.open-alternative-jev · JevBench rank 31 · Capability 48.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.5.Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model · JevBench rank 60 · Capability 48.2 · Cost $0.0065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 49.2.spark-s1-4b-v6 · JevBench rank 13 · Capability 46.3 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.0.open-jev-deberta-v3-large · JevBench rank 62 · Capability 46.1 · Cost $0.0073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.0.Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2 · JevBench rank 73 · Capability 45.5 · Cost $0.012 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.5.BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3 · JevBench rank 74 · Capability 44.6 · Cost $0.0077 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.5.OpenDecision · JevBench rank 48 · Capability 44.4 · Cost $0.0066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.9.smalljev semantic-v9 · JevBench rank 63 · Capability 42.4 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.8.kev 0.6B · JevBench rank 45 · Capability 42.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.6.Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base · JevBench rank 75 · Capability 41.9 · Cost $0.010 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.6.Certo v1 · JevBench rank 76 · Capability 41.5 · Cost $0.00097 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 94.0.decider-2b · JevBench rank 34 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.kev 8B · JevBench rank 42 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.9.kev 4B · JevBench rank 24 · Capability 40.9 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.7.GLiNER2.5 multi · JevBench rank 67 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.8.kev 0.5B · JevBench rank 51 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.openJev Verdict · JevBench rank 54 · Capability 38.5 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.7.system-one · JevBench rank 47 · Capability 38.2 · Cost $0.089 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.4.Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits · JevBench rank 17 · Capability 37.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.GLiNER2.5 small · JevBench rank 69 · Capability 35.6 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.8.SimpleJev · JevBench rank 68 · Capability 35.3 · Cost $0.011 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 57.5.Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits · JevBench rank 46 · Capability 34.9 · Cost $0.087 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.3.Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits · JevBench rank 55 · Capability 28.8 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.7.GLiNER2 large · JevBench rank 58 · Capability 28.0 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.7.GLiNER2 · JevBench rank 64 · Capability 26.3 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.8.Open Jev JSON Canvas · JevBench rank 77 · Capability 24.1 · Cost $0.065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.1.Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits · JevBench rank 70 · Capability 21.8 · Cost $0.0074 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.9.Mirror · JevBench rank 72 · Capability 19.8 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.8.
  1. Capability #1 · GPT-6 Luna (medium)
    Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 / 1,000 · Speed 72.6 · JevBench #30
  2. Capability #2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 / 1,000 · Speed 71.6 · JevBench #71
  3. Capability #3 · GPT-6 Luna (low)
    Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 / 1,000 · Speed 73.7 · JevBench #27
  4. Capability #4 · GPT-5.6 Luna
    Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 / 1,000 · Speed 77.5 · JevBench #53
  5. Capability #5 · djev
    Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated / 1,000 · Speed 75.2 · JevBench #57
79 systems plotted. Hover or focus a point to read its values.

Capability vs speed

The upper-right is the more attractive area: higher Capability and higher Speed.

Capability vs speedThe upper-right is the more attractive area: higher Capability and higher Speed. Each point has a tooltip with the system and its values.020406080100020406080100Speed axis · higher is faster →Capability · higher ↑GPT-6 Luna (medium) · JevBench rank 30 · Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.6.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · JevBench rank 71 · Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.6.GPT-6 Luna (low) · JevBench rank 27 · Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.7.GPT-5.6 Luna · JevBench rank 53 · Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.5.djev · JevBench rank 57 · Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.2.Qwen3.8 27B · Capability 67.0 · Cost $2.67 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.3.Jev 1.13.0 · JevBench rank 1 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3.NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed · JevBench rank 29 · Capability 64.1 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.2.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 40 · Capability 63.7 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.Hopper · JevBench rank 3 · Capability 63.5 · Cost $0.024 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.8.SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B · JevBench rank 28 · Capability 63.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.2.JevOne · JevBench rank 43 · Capability 62.6 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.5.classifier.dev · Capability 62.0 · Cost $0.0033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.reflex-27b · JevBench rank 56 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.18 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.5.JevK5 v0.2.0 · JevBench rank 2 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1.LitJev · JevBench rank 49 · Capability 61.4 · Cost $0.16 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.7.openjev-sglang · JevBench rank 38 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.13 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.1.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 41 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.jqv · JevBench rank 14 · Capability 59.0 · Cost $0.056 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.6.reflex 4B · JevBench rank 5 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 68.0.ZeroEntropy zerank-2 · JevBench rank 19 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.047 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.0.local-jev Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 11 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.OpenJev · JevBench rank 59 · Capability 58.1 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.1.JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4 · JevBench rank 22 · Capability 57.3 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.3.Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · JevBench rank 61 · Capability 56.9 · Cost $0.26 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.8.Winnow-12B Q8 · JevBench rank 4 · Capability 56.6 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.3.Decision 2B · JevBench rank 25 · Capability 56.4 · Cost $0.018 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.3.decider-35b-a3b · JevBench rank 16 · Capability 56.2 · Cost $0.067 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.8.metask-jev-4b · JevBench rank 8 · Capability 55.8 · Cost $0.033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.1.SemIf · JevBench rank 9 · Capability 55.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.7.Jev-Omni · JevBench rank 7 · Capability 55.4 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.5.Von · JevBench rank 39 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.0055 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.5.Jobe Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 10 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.6.Qwen3-Reranker-4B · JevBench rank 15 · Capability 54.9 · Cost $0.050 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.decision-machine-1 · JevBench rank 20 · Capability 54.8 · Cost $0.035 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.jev-local · JevBench rank 32 · Capability 54.7 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 69.2.Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2 · JevBench rank 26 · Capability 54.4 · Cost $0.083 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.Open-Jev 9B · JevBench rank 65 · Capability 53.0 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.0.SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · JevBench rank 44 · Capability 52.8 · Cost $0.12 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.lev-350m · JevBench rank 37 · Capability 52.7 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.3.jeff · JevBench rank 35 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.0060 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 63.5.Bespoke Nimble 9B · JevBench rank 52 · Capability 51.4 · Cost $0.17 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.Decision Fast · JevBench rank 33 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.6.djev · JevBench rank 6 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.026 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.OpenSourceJev · JevBench rank 18 · Capability 51.1 · Cost $0.016 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.openJev Verdict 1.4 · JevBench rank 50 · Capability 50.7 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.1.Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits · JevBench rank 21 · Capability 50.3 · Cost $0.048 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.8.OpenJev · JevBench rank 23 · Capability 50.2 · Cost $0.066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.Laya · JevBench rank 36 · Capability 49.9 · Cost $0.0029 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.1.system-one-open · JevBench rank 12 · Capability 49.5 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.Open-Jev 2B · JevBench rank 66 · Capability 48.8 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.5.open-alternative-jev · JevBench rank 31 · Capability 48.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.5.Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model · JevBench rank 60 · Capability 48.2 · Cost $0.0065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 49.2.spark-s1-4b-v6 · JevBench rank 13 · Capability 46.3 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.0.open-jev-deberta-v3-large · JevBench rank 62 · Capability 46.1 · Cost $0.0073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.0.Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2 · JevBench rank 73 · Capability 45.5 · Cost $0.012 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.5.BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3 · JevBench rank 74 · Capability 44.6 · Cost $0.0077 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.5.OpenDecision · JevBench rank 48 · Capability 44.4 · Cost $0.0066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.9.smalljev semantic-v9 · JevBench rank 63 · Capability 42.4 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.8.kev 0.6B · JevBench rank 45 · Capability 42.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.6.Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base · JevBench rank 75 · Capability 41.9 · Cost $0.010 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.6.Certo v1 · JevBench rank 76 · Capability 41.5 · Cost $0.00097 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 94.0.decider-2b · JevBench rank 34 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.kev 8B · JevBench rank 42 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.9.kev 4B · JevBench rank 24 · Capability 40.9 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.7.GLiNER2.5 multi · JevBench rank 67 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.8.kev 0.5B · JevBench rank 51 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.openJev Verdict · JevBench rank 54 · Capability 38.5 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.7.system-one · JevBench rank 47 · Capability 38.2 · Cost $0.089 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.4.Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits · JevBench rank 17 · Capability 37.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.GLiNER2.5 small · JevBench rank 69 · Capability 35.6 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.8.SimpleJev · JevBench rank 68 · Capability 35.3 · Cost $0.011 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 57.5.Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits · JevBench rank 46 · Capability 34.9 · Cost $0.087 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.3.Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits · JevBench rank 55 · Capability 28.8 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.7.GLiNER2 large · JevBench rank 58 · Capability 28.0 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.7.GLiNER2 · JevBench rank 64 · Capability 26.3 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.8.Open Jev JSON Canvas · JevBench rank 77 · Capability 24.1 · Cost $0.065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.1.Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits · JevBench rank 70 · Capability 21.8 · Cost $0.0074 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.9.Mirror · JevBench rank 72 · Capability 19.8 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.8.
  1. Capability #1 · GPT-6 Luna (medium)
    Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 / 1,000 · Speed 72.6 · JevBench #30
  2. Capability #2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 / 1,000 · Speed 71.6 · JevBench #71
  3. Capability #3 · GPT-6 Luna (low)
    Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 / 1,000 · Speed 73.7 · JevBench #27
  4. Capability #4 · GPT-5.6 Luna
    Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 / 1,000 · Speed 77.5 · JevBench #53
  5. Capability #5 · djev
    Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated / 1,000 · Speed 75.2 · JevBench #57
79 systems plotted. Hover or focus a point to read its values.

All three at once

The 3D view plots Capability vertically, lower cost to the right, and higher Speed toward you. Sphere size follows the JevBench score. Drag to rotate; pinch or scroll to zoom. The view loads when it scrolls into view.

Scroll here to load the interactive 3D view.

Top five Jev-class systems by official JevBench Composite Score.

  1. Composite #1 · Jev 1.13.0
    Score 63.3 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3 · Official JevBench #1
  2. Composite #2 · JevK5 v0.2.0
    Score 62.0 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1 · Official JevBench #2
  3. Composite #3 · Hopper
    Score 59.4 · Capability 63.5 · Cost $0.024 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.8 · Official JevBench #3
  4. Composite #4 · Winnow-12B Q8
    Score 55.6 · Capability 56.6 · Cost $0.037 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.3 · Official JevBench #4
  5. Composite #5 · djev
    Score 52.2 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.026 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4 · Official JevBench #6

The interactive 3D view loads when this panel scrolls into view.

79 systems plotted; systems missing cost or Speed are omitted.