← All models

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

deprecated by benchmark source
Google · released 2026-03-03 · 3 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 1 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

3 of 7 inputs · 1 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

19.9

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding v4.x: percentile 40AA Intelligence (est.): percentile 58Epoch ECI: percentile 26

AA Coding v4.x 34.7Coding Agent v1.4 —AA Intelligence (est.) 6.3AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 144.3Software ECI —DesignArena —/—

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

22 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-AnalystAgent118.8%

    AA-AnalystAgent published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests analyst tasks using agentic Python execution across fourteen domains.

  • APEX-Agents-AA2112.2%

    APEX-Agents-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional-service tasks that require agents to produce locally graded deliverables.

  • AA-Briefcase10226 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v227596 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Harvey LAB-AA231.1%

    Harvey LAB-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests legal-work deliverables across practice areas on Harvey's private task set. Artificial Analysis' run, graded by one LLM judge against task rubrics — not the same run or scale as Vals AI's HLAB row.

  • Terminal-Bench Hard (AA)6524.2%

    Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) pinned revision 74221fb → · Published board — Tests a pinned 44-task hard subset of terminal-based work using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA)3631.1%

    Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA) v2.1 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 89-task verified refresh using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)400.5%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

Coding

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.13543.4%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-274034.7

    AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-27 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis withdrew the Coding Index with Intelligence Index v5.0 (2026-10-28). These are the last v4.x values, frozen with their own date (2026-10-27).

Instruction-following

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)397.8%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.17474.3%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

  • MLCR-AA226.1%

    MLCR-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests medical-record synthesis and reasoning across long, fragmented case documents.

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6346.8%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA928.0%

    EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests enterprise workflows through MCP tools against resettable application environments.

  • τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)3831.3%

    τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests dual-control telecom agents that coordinate tool use with a simulated user.

  • τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1299.7%

    τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests banking support agents that retrieve policies and change account state through tools.

Vision

Unusual results

2 threshold-crossing signals flagged · 22 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually weak Harvey LAB-AA published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.31148 fraction
    Peer mean 0.80562 · peer sd 0.16716 · n 48 · families 39
    Directed z -2.956 · baseline z -0.282 · gap -2.674 · profile n 21
    0.31148 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: Harvey LAB-AA · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.311477782602403 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:598190f8-dc9c-4fea-a7ea-4b81c402ab18:harveyLab
  • unusually strong IFBench (AA single-turn) published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.77211 fraction
    Peer mean 0.48006 · peer sd 0.17139 · n 450 · families 331
    Directed z 1.704 · baseline z -0.504 · gap 2.208 · profile n 21
    0.77211 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: IFBench (AA single-turn) · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.772108843537415 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:598190f8-dc9c-4fea-a7ea-4b81c402ab18:ifbench
Missing coverage · 297 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite34.76.3est.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite——
Token offers by platform · 2 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

2 offers within the active global filters, 1 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven