Kimi K2
Context 128K tokens
Top 1 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)
Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.
| # | Provider | Price channel | Raw input $/1M | Raw output $/1M | Adjusted $/task |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novitavia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Novita's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2/providers), collected 2026-11-03. | via OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Novita's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2/providers), collected 2026-11-03. | $0.570 | $2.30 |
Composite
1 of 7 inputs6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one17.0
Thin data · 1/7Based on only 1 of 7 Composite inputs — treat this rank as uncertaindominance-adjusted from 18.1: a better-measured model that is at least as good on each of these inputs ranks above it
AA Coding v4.x —Coding Agent v1.4 —AA Intelligence (est.) 5.4AA Agentic —Epoch ECI —Software ECI —DesignArena —/—
Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.
Benchmark sheet
23 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.
Agentic
Terminal-Bench Hard (AA)5315.9%
Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) pinned revision 74221fb → · Published board — Tests a pinned 44-task hard subset of terminal-based work using Terminus 2.
Elimination Game Benchmark423
Elimination Game Benchmark published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Multi-player tournament where 8 LLM players converse, form alliances, and vote to eliminate each other, with final rankings scored via TrueSkill.
Coding
Aider Polyglot6759.1%
Aider Polyglot published 2026-09-10 → · edit format: diff — Evaluates LLMs on 225 Exercism coding exercises across six languages, testing code editing without human intervention.
GSO software optimization, Opt@1 (UC Berkeley) opt1-102334.9%
GSO software optimization, Opt@1 (UC Berkeley) opt1-102 → · OpenHands — An agent gets a real codebase and a performance test and must make the code as fast as an expert developer's optimization; 102 tasks across 10 codebases and 5 languages.
Instruction-following
IFBench (AA single-turn)4241.5%
IFBench (AA single-turn) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests precise single-turn instructions with deterministic rule checks.
LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib)52348.7
LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib) v0.2.0 → · Published board — A model builds the longest chain of English words it can, each differing from the last by one letter, with no repeats and only dictionary words, from 50 starting words; any broken rule ends the chain.
Knowledge
Humanity's Last Exam (AA text-only)457.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA text-only) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests expert-level knowledge on AA's text-only Humanity's Last Exam subset.
AA-Omniscience Index56-28.3
AA-Omniscience Index published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests factual reliability while rewarding correct answers and penalizing hallucinations.
UGI NatInt7748.9
UGI NatInt published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A private-question evaluation of general knowledge and reasoning across textbook, popular-culture and world-model topics.
Long-context
AA-LCR v1.14853.0%
AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.
Math
AIME 2025 (AA)5457.0%
AIME 2025 (AA) v2025 → · Published board — Advanced mathematical problem solving on AIME I and II 2025.
Reasoning
SimpleBench3526.3%
SimpleBench published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A multiple-choice text benchmark of over 200 questions covering spatio-temporal reasoning, social intelligence, and linguistic adversarial robustness, on which a non-specialized human baseline outperforms every tested LLM.
SimpleBench3526.3%
SimpleBench published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — A multiple-choice text benchmark of over 200 questions covering spatio-temporal reasoning, social intelligence, and linguistic adversarial robustness, on which a non-specialized human baseline outperforms every tested LLM.
Safety/Alignment
BullshitBench V1 (clear pushback)3820.0%
BullshitBench V1 (clear pushback) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Whether a model rejects the broken premise of 55 deliberately nonsensical prompts (V1 question set) instead of answering them confidently.
BullshitBench V2 (clear pushback)1010.0%
BullshitBench V2 (clear pushback) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Whether a model rejects the broken premise of 100 deliberately nonsensical prompts (V2 question set) instead of answering them confidently.
Science
CritPt (AA)240.0%
CritPt (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests research-level physics reasoning with Python, symbolic and numerical answers.
GPQA Diamond (AA)6176.6%
GPQA Diamond (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry knowledge on the Diamond subset.
Tool-use
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)5761.1%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests dual-control telecom agents that coordinate tool use with a simulated user.
Uncensored
UGI Willingness573.20
UGI Willingness published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A private-question evaluation of how far a model follows challenging instructions before refusing or deviating.
UGI9456.5
UGI published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A private-question suite combining sensitive-topic knowledge with willingness to follow controversial instructions.
Writing
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3911,666 Elo
EQ-Bench Creative Writing v3 v3 → · Published board — A LLM-judged creative writing benchmark with vocabulary and GPT-slop controls.
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing v1.118768.1
EQ-Bench Longform Creative Writing v1.11 → · Published board — LLM-judged benchmark in which models plan and write a short story/novella over 8x 1000-word turns, scored 0-100 across 14 rubric dimensions.
UGI Writing8052.5
UGI Writing published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A maintainer-owned writing evaluation considering intelligence, style, repetition and length adherence, informed by human preferences.
Missing coverage · 296 benchmark versions
No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.
Token offers by platform · 1 offer (Adjusted $/task)
Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.
1 offer within the active global filters; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.
OpenRouter (1)
Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2/providers, collected 2026-11-03.
| Novita | globalnovita/fp8 | $0.570 raw in $/1M | $2.30 raw out $/1M |