← All models

o1

deprecated by benchmark source
OpenAI · released 2024-12-05 · 2 offers

Context 200K tokens

Top 1 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azure AI Foundrydirect — Direct price: Azure AI Foundry's own price list (https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

4 of 7 inputs · 2 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

19.6

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding v4.x: percentile 46AA Intelligence (est.): percentile 53Epoch ECI: percentile 19Software ECI: percentile 11

AA Coding v4.x 39.7Coding Agent v1.4 —AA Intelligence (est.) 6.2AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 141.8Software ECI 141.3DesignArena —/—

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

11 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

1 of 12 values are OpenAI's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

Coding

  • AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-274639.7

    AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-27 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis withdrew the Coding Index with Intelligence Index v5.0 (2026-10-28). These are the last v4.x values, frozen with their own date (2026-10-27).

Instruction-following

Knowledge

Long-context

  • AA-LCR v1.15965.0%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

Science

Tool-use

Vision

  • MMMUdeveloper's claim78.2%† self-reported by the developer

    MMMU published 2026-09-10 → · validation — A multimodal benchmark of 11.5K college-level questions across six disciplines and 30 subjects, with 30 heterogeneous image types.

  • CharXiv Reasoning val-v1.07152.6%

    CharXiv Reasoning val-v1.0 → · validation — Can a multimodal model reason over the real, messy charts in scientific papers — combining values, trends and labels across a figure — rather than read off templated plots?

Writing

  • BuzzBench10059.3

    BuzzBench published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — An LLM-judged evaluation of humour explanation and predicted audience response to Never Mind the Buzzcocks introductions.

Missing coverage · 308 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Token offers by platform · 2 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

2 offers within the active global filters; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

Azure AI Foundry (2)

Direct prices from Azure AI Foundry's own price list. Source: prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure AI Foundry
Azure AI Foundry
o1 — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven