Frozen JevBench release v1.4.2.1

JevBench v1.4.2.1 — frozen results

This page always uses the public, hash-checked v1.4.2.1 artifact. The live board may change when a later release is published.

Artifact SHA-256 e4c5ec1b510212e29cba130a7a861096623c484dab9f5ecf9893360c1e993166.

534 public + 308 sealed decisions · only system-level sealed aggregates are published.

Share this version · View live board

JevBench v1.4.2.1 ranking

JevBench v1.4.2.1

JevBench Composite Score: 90 ranked systems

Official· four axes 0–100, equal-weight harmonic mean · What changed in v1.4 ↓

Weights:
Adjust weights ↓
View by:

Plumb-4B leads the equal-weight JevBench Score at 65.84, ahead of decider-4b v2 (64.13). Jev 1.13.0 remains ahead of decider-4b v2 on Intelligence and Calibration; decider-4b v2 leads on Speed and Cost. Sort by Intelligence to compare raw reasoning.

Greener = stronger within its column.

94 of 94 systems, sorted by official rank, #1 first.

  1. 1Plumb-4Bnew65.8I 53C 75S 93K 56est.$0.030
  2. 2decider-4b v264.1I 49C 75S 93K 61est.$0.020
  3. 3Jev 1.13.0API63.3I 53C 76S 83K 52$0.040
  4. 4JevK5 v0.2.062.0I 49C 75S 91K 60est.$0.022
  5. 5Cygnet61.8I 50C 75S 91K 53est.$0.037
  6. 6Hopper59.4I 48C 79S 87K 59est.$0.024
  7. 7Winnow-12B Q855.6I 48C 65S 82K 53est.$0.037
  8. 8reflex 4B54.0I 47C 70S 68K 60est.$0.022
  9. 9djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma)52.2I 47C 55S 91K 58ann.$0.026
  10. 10Jev-Omni51.3I 47C 64S 82K 53est.$0.037
  11. 11metask-jev-4b47.8I 45C 67S 89K 55est.$0.033
  12. 12SemIf47.7I 44C 67S 84K 59est.$0.022
  13. 13Jobe Qwen3.5-4B46.9I 44C 66S 86K 60est.$0.022
  14. 14local-jev Qwen3.5-4B46.8I 44C 73S 75K 56est.$0.030
  15. 15system-one-openAPI45.1I 44C 55S 77K 65est.$0.015
  16. 16spark-s1-4b-v644.6I 45C 48S 81K 58est.$0.025
  17. 17Malkuth-4B44.5I 43C 61S 88K 62est.$0.019
  18. 18jqv44.4I 46C 72S 75K 47est.$0.056
  19. 19Qwen3-Reranker-4B43.5I 45C 65S 79K 49$0.050
  20. 20decider-35b-a3b41.2I 47C 65S 81K 45est.$0.067
Show all 94 systems (70 more ranked, 4 more not ranked)
  1. 21Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits41.0I 46C 29S 88K 60est.$0.022
  2. 22OpenSourceJev40.9I 42C 60S 82K 64est.$0.016
  3. 23ZeroEntropy zerank-240.2I 42C 76S 79K 50$0.047
  4. 24decision-machine-1API39.9I 41C 68S 93K 54$0.035
  5. 25Malkuth-2B38.9I 41C 53S 91K 62est.$0.019
  6. 26Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits38.0I 42C 59S 89K 50est.$0.048
  7. 27JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP437.7I 47C 68S 93K 43est.$0.077
  8. 28OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16)36.9I 45C 55S 83K 45est.$0.066
  9. 29kev 4B36.1I 42C 40S 76K 62est.$0.019
  10. 30Decision 2B35.8I 39C 74S 84K 63est.$0.018
  11. 31Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v235.2I 47C 61S 82K 42est.$0.083
  12. 32GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort)API35.1I 96C 92S 74K 37$0.127
  13. 33SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27BAPI34.6I 52C 74S 71K 39est.$0.104
  14. 34NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed34.0I 50C 79S 88K 39est.$0.109
  15. 35swanOne33.6I 53C 71S 83K 39est.$0.111
  16. 36GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort)API33.3I 97C 93S 73K 36$0.135
  17. 37open-alternative-jev33.2I 39C 59S 83K 60est.$0.022
  18. 38jev-local32.5I 45C 64S 69K 43est.$0.077
  19. 39Decision Fast32.5I 37C 65S 82K 76est.$0.0063
  20. 40decider-2b30.7I 39C 43S 83K 61est.$0.020
  21. 41jeff30.6I 37C 68S 63K 77est.$0.0060
  22. 42Laya30.3I 36C 64S 71K 86est.$0.0029
  23. 43Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B ITAPI30.0I 60C 79S 84K 36$0.136
  24. 44Standard One 8B29.1I 46C 66S 92K 39est.$0.104
  25. 45lev-350m28.5I 35C 71S 85K 76est.$0.0063
  26. 46openjev-sglangAPI27.7I 49C 69S 77K 36est.$0.131
  27. 47Von27.5I 34C 76S 70K 78est.$0.0055
  28. 48NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5)26.9I 51C 76S 80K 35est.$0.145
  29. 49NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP426.3I 51C 67S 80K 35est.$0.145
  30. 50kev 8B25.6I 42C 40S 75K 44est.$0.073
  31. 51JevOne25.5I 48C 78S 88K 36est.$0.137
  32. 52typecastlm25.3I 34C 62S 93K 60est.$0.021
  33. 53SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAPI24.9I 46C 60S 75K 38est.$0.116
  34. 54kev 0.6B24.8I 34C 50S 76K 76est.$0.0063
  35. 55Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits23.7I 46C 24S 86K 42est.$0.087
  36. 56system-one23.4I 44C 33S 84K 41est.$0.089
  37. 57OpenDecision21.6I 32C 57S 80K 75est.$0.0066
  38. 58LitJev19.5I 46C 77S 67K 34est.$0.163
  39. 59openJev Verdict 1.419.0I 29C 72S 78K 82est.$0.0039
  40. 60kev 0.5B18.9I 31C 50S 77K 76est.$0.0063
  41. 61Bespoke Nimble 9B18.7I 46C 56S 79K 33est.$0.166
  42. 62GPT-5.6 LunaAPI18.5I 93C 87S 78K 28$0.242
  43. 63openJev Verdict18.1I 30C 47S 77K 83est.$0.0037
  44. 64Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits18.1I 33C 24S 90K 65est.$0.015
  45. 65reflex-27b17.8I 46C 77S 67K 32est.$0.181
  46. 66JevActAPI16.9I 29C 55S 76K 64est.$0.015
  47. 67djev (thinking)15.2I 72C 88S 75K 27est.$0.274
  48. 68GLiNER2 large15.1I 31C 25S 62K 73est.$0.0077
  49. 69OpenJev (thinking, BF16)14.8I 58C 58S 76K 28est.$0.255
  50. 70Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model14.5I 28C 68S 49K 76est.$0.0065
  51. 71Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteAPI14.3I 54C 59S 82K 27$0.264
  52. 72open-jev-deberta-v3-large12.6I 26C 67S 66K 74est.$0.0073
  53. 73smalljev semantic-v912.3I 26C 59S 80K 58est.$0.025
  54. 74GLiNER211.8I 27C 25S 72K 83est.$0.0037
  55. 75InstinctAPI11.4I 51C 79S 84K 25est.$0.325
  56. 76Open-Jev 9B11.2I 44C 62S 72K 28est.$0.249
  57. 77Open-Jev 2B10.0I 42C 55S 73K 28est.$0.249
  58. 78GLiNER2.5 multi9.8I 23C 57S 68K 82est.$0.0039
  59. 79CLM-8B8.6I 22C 40S 94K 78est.$0.0052
  60. 80SimpleJev7.5I 21C 49S 57K 68est.$0.011
  61. 81GLiNER2.5 small7.2I 20C 51S 78K 82est.$0.0039
  62. 82Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits7.1I 23C 21S 90K 74est.$0.0074
  63. 83verdict-small5.7I 18C 67S 85K 97est.$0.0013
  64. 84DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAPI4.8I 94C 96S 72K 17$0.594
  65. 85Mirror2.1I 14C 26S 71K 73est.$0.0077
  66. 86Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v20.4I 7C 84S 88K 68$0.012
  67. 87BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m30.2I 5C 84S 90K 73$0.0077
  68. 88Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base0.2I 5C 79S 91K 70$0.010
  69. 89Certo v10.0I 0C 83S 94K 100est.$0.0010
  70. 90Open Jev JSON Canvas0.0I 48C 0S 84K 46est.$0.065
  71. classifier.dev (honorable mention)API70.8I 52C 72S 88K 84est.$0.0033
  72. Qwen3.8 27B (partial run)API0.0I 40C 94S 61K 0est.$2.669
  73. Needle 3, options as tools (partial run)—I –C –S –K –est.$0.014
  74. Needle 3 (partial run)—I –C –S –K –est.$0.024
Weights:
Adjust weights ↓

Weights are relative: each axis counts in proportion to its slider. The score stays a weighted harmonic mean with the low-axis gates; an axis at 0 drops out together with its gate. Only equal weights give the official JevBench Score and rank.

Score = 4 / (1/I + 1/C + 1/S + 1/K) (each 0–100; × (axis / 50)² for Intelligence, Speed or Cost below 50)

  • Jev (TypeSafe, closed)
  • Jev rebuild
  • Instruction model, JSON schema
  • Small tool-calling model
  • Service built on Jev
  • Zero-shot classifier
  • Closed decision API
  • Reranker (neutral adapter)
  • Raw-logit control (base model)
  • Native-logit decision engine
  • system-one-open
  • Shown, not ranked
I, C, S, K = Intelligence, Calibration, Speed, Cost; the est. pill = estimated cost; ann. = announced price; API = the operator's endpoint saw sealed item text, without answers; new = first listed in v1.4.2.1; $/1k decisions = US dollars per 1,000 decisions (not heat-shaded). Names link to each project.

Compare two systems

Pick any two. Four radars: the score axes, accuracy per tier including the sealed set, accuracy by family on the current v1.4 question set (hard tier and sealed set together), and the sealed set alone. Further out is better on every spoke; the link keeps the pair.

  • A: Jev 1.13.0 — Jev (TypeSafe, closed) · Score 63.3 (#3)
  • B: Plumb-4B — Jev rebuild · Score 65.8 (#1)

The four score axes

Radar: the four score axes, two systemsThe four score axes, Jev 1.13.0 vs Plumb-4B. Intelligence: 53.1 vs 53.0; Calibration: 76.3 vs 75.5; Speed: 83.3 vs 93.5; Cost: 52.0 vs 55.8.50100Intelligence53.1 · 53.0Calibration76.3 · 75.5Speed83.3 · 93.5Cost52.0 · 55.8
0–100, the values in the table. A label-only system has no calibration (counted as 0).

Accuracy per tier, incl. sealed

Radar: accuracy per tier, incl. sealed, two systemsAccuracy per tier, incl. sealed, Jev 1.13.0 vs Plumb-4B. Easy: 100% vs 100%; Standard: 99% vs 98%; Judge: 95% vs 95%; Hard: 74% vs 78%; Sealed: 37% vs 38%.50100Easy100% · 100%Standard99% · 98%Judge95% · 95%Hard74% · 78%Sealed37% · 38%
Share correct per tier; Sealed = the 308 private decisions, aggregate only.

Current question set by family (hard + sealed)

Plumb-4B has no published hard-tier family breakdown; families that need it are left out (—).

Radar: current question set by family (hard + sealed), two systemsCurrent question set by family (hard + sealed), Jev 1.13.0 vs Plumb-4B. Ambiguous / abstain: 43% vs —; Judge: 54% vs —; Long policy: 44% vs —; Multi-hop: 64% vs —; Probability: 63% vs —; Temporal / numeric: 28% vs —; Trade-off: 55% vs —; Routing: 100% vs —; Trap / adversarial: 83% vs —; Paraphrase: 64% vs 43%; Safety judge: 38% vs 31%.50100Ambiguous /abstain43%Judge54%Long policy44%Multi-hop64%Probability63%Temporal /numeric28%Trade-off55%Routing100%Trap /adversarial83%Paraphrase64% · 43%Safety judge38% · 31%
Share correct per family across the 220 hard-tier decisions (public and held out) and the 308 sealed decisions of v1.4, pooled; Routing is hard-tier only, Paraphrase and Safety judge sealed only.

Sealed set by family

Radar: sealed set by family, two systemsSealed set by family, Jev 1.13.0 vs Plumb-4B. Ambiguous / abstain: 30% vs 59%; Judge: 34% vs 29%; Long policy: 28% vs 30%; Multi-hop: 45% vs 42%; Paraphrase: 64% vs 43%; Probability: 50% vs 29%; Safety judge: 38% vs 31%; Temporal / numeric: 29% vs 38%; Trade-off: 38% vs 35%; Trap / adversarial: 42% vs 50%.50100Ambiguous /abstain30% · 59%Judge34% · 29%Long policy28% · 30%Multi-hop45% · 42%Paraphrase64% · 43%Probability50% · 29%Safety judge38% · 31%Temporal /numeric29% · 38%Trade-off38% · 35%Trap /adversarial42% · 50%
Share correct within each sealed family — system-level aggregates; the items stay private.
All values as a table
SpokeA: Jev 1.13.0B: Plumb-4B
The four score axes
Intelligence53.153.0
Calibration76.375.5
Speed83.393.5
Cost52.055.8
Accuracy per tier, incl. sealed
Easy100%100%
Standard99%98%
Judge95%95%
Hard74%78%
Sealed37%38%
Current question set by family (hard + sealed)
Ambiguous / abstain43%—
Judge54%—
Long policy44%—
Multi-hop64%—
Probability63%—
Temporal / numeric28%—
Trade-off55%—
Routing100%—
Trap / adversarial83%—
Paraphrase64%43%
Safety judge38%31%
Sealed set by family
Ambiguous / abstain30%59%
Judge34%29%
Long policy28%30%
Multi-hop45%42%
Paraphrase64%43%
Probability50%29%
Safety judge38%31%
Temporal / numeric29%38%
Trade-off38%35%
Trap / adversarial42%50%

Axes, accuracy, latency and cost

Every system with its four axes, public and sealed accuracy and the gap between them. Click a column heading to sort; filter by name, type, openness, API flag or release. On a phone the name column stays put while the table scrolls sideways. † = a note on that system — tap it to read.

Greener = stronger within its column; faster counts as stronger. Badges: API sealed text went to the operator's endpoint · est. estimated price · ann. announced price not yet bookable · not ranked partial run or honorable mention · new first listed in v1.4.2.1.

Endpoint
1
Plumb-4B
†Crh225/plumb-4b @ 55de037801a8a9b9de3db5c0e16cef86210c2186: merged bf16 weights, LoRA r16 on the attention projections of JevK5 v0.2 (itself Qwen3.5-4B), served by the author's documented command, jevk5 v0.2.0's own jevk5-serve (github.com/allebee/jevk5, Apache-2.0), unmodified. One forward pass per decision: softmax over the declared options' answer-letter logits at the last position divided by the package's own T = 2.07 (jevk5_config.json), up to 16 options, 0 generated tokens; inputs over 16,384 tokens are refused rather than truncated. Disclosed by the author: no JevBench item was trained or tuned on and every checkpoint and temperature choice came from his own held-out sets, but the 231 public items were scored after each of five training rounds and that aggregate feedback shaped the recipe (hard mining, long documents, document length) — development against the public distribution, stated plainly. His own overlap audit dropped 9 training items sharing more than two 8-word spans with a public item. Independent top-five gate (25 Sep 2026): LEGIT — cost basis (same as its JevK5 parent), public-versus-sealed gap against like-for-like rows, an 8-gram screen of its released training data (no row shares more than two 8-grams with a public item) and an exact composite recomputation. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium H100 80 GB (Hopper) pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate at the EmpirioLabs Qwen3.5-4B public pay-as-you-go list price ($0.04/M input, no output generated), applied to this system's measured tokens; it is not a GPU bill. 25 Sep 2026 pre-release correction: retired DeepInfra $0.03/M input reference replaced by bookable EmpirioLabs $0.04/M exact-base input reference; draft score 67.09 to 65.84.
newby crh225 · crh225, JevK5 v0.2 + LoRA · details
65.853.075.593.555.889.6%38.0%+51.6 ppest.$0.0300.02 sRunPod GPU
2
decider-4b v2
†Decider-ai 1.2.2 (PyPI wheel identical to tag v1.2.2 abadc94), weights Mapika/decider-4b rev 7ab294cbdf6be6ac17fc818c10cdead744393d92 (decider_config version 4b-v2, T=1.935), uvicorn decider.serve:app. Disclosed by the author: 8,000 of the v2 LoRA rows come from generators written from the published names of the ten sealed families (no item read). Independent #1 gate (24 Sep): LEGIT. The author's private stage-2 training rows could not be audited for overlap with public items. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (4B dense size class, as decider-2b), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by Mapika · details
64.149.475.092.960.983.5%34.7%+48.8 ppest.$0.0200.02 sRunPod GPU
3
Jev 1.13.0APIby TypeSafe AI · details
63.353.176.383.352.086.6%36.7%+49.9 pp$0.0400.65 sAPI
4
JevK5 v0.2.0
†Author says no JevBench items or outputs were used for training, tuning, or selection; public results are reported. Scan found only one generic instruction shared by 8 public hard items; unreleased teacher/replay corpora were unavailable.
by allebee · details
62.048.974.591.159.585.3%33.1%+52.2 ppest.$0.022—unknown
5
Cygnet
†Blockbrain-ai/cygnet-recipe 81974de: frozen google/gemma-4-12B-it rev 707f0a3b8a3c7ad586ed01e27eafbad8a27dd0f7 on unmodified vLLM 0.30.0 (image vllm/vllm-openai:v0.30.0@sha256:8a69ffad…), the author's shim: options as letters in the benchmark's label order, logits masked to the option letters, one calibration temperature T=3.4 fitted on the author's own items. The shim sends its own system prompt and renders structured state with json indent=1. Over-context/over-26-option inputs are HTTP 422 (a wrong answer). Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter google/gemma-3-12b-it list price $0.05/M input (the nearest hosted 12B Gemma; gemma-4-12b-it is not listed; the Winnow-12B / Jev-Omni precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by blockbrain · blockbrain, frozen Gemma-4-12B-it · details
61.849.574.990.752.887.9%33.8%+54.1 ppest.$0.0370.04 sRunPod GPU
6
Hopper
†Author discloses heavy public-benchmark-directed development (26 model/prompt configs, 20+ calibration-map variants observed against the public half); scan of 17 released files vs 231 public tasks found 0 state/instruction matches; training corpus not released so overlap not independently verifiable.
by HopitAI · details
59.448.079.186.858.782.3%34.1%+48.2 ppest.$0.0240.13 sRunPod GPU
7
Winnow-12B Q8
†The submitted Q8_0 GGUF ran through the pinned author's TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone server with 8,192 context, four resident decision branches, Q8 KV, and full GPU offload. The private training corpus was not released. The author's checksum-based audit reports zero exact public-item overlap, but that claim cannot be independently reproduced; our scan found no exact public state or instruction text in the released artifacts. Cost uses the $0.05/M-input hosted Gemma 3 12B reference, not free/100.
by Eldan Ring · details
55.648.364.882.352.985.7%33.1%+52.6 ppest.$0.0370.23 sRunPod GPU
8
reflex 4B
†The author's reflex-serve: Qwen3.5-4B with the published LoRA and its per-primitive calibration file; the state is encoded once and each question read from the label logits. Run serially on our GPU; the author discloses that the 231 public items were used four times as a development gate.
by kshetrajna12 · details
54.047.570.468.059.779.2%28.2%+51.0 ppest.$0.0221.80 sRunPod GPU
9
djev
†The measured endpoint was Maisa's hosted API in free preview; the cost uses its announced price ($0.035 per million input tokens, output free), and nothing was charged. The self-hostable djev-dev runtime is Apache-2.0 and applies a structured one-step inference method to Google's Apache-2.0 diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it checkpoint; it adds no separately trained djev weights. Probabilities are djev's own (its docs call them experimental and uncalibrated). v1.4: hosted api.djev.dev was paused by its operator ("Serving is paused by the administrator"); sealed tier measured on the public djev runtime (Davipar/djev-dev 3ce907e, same weights, default mode) self-hosted on an H100; Speed/Cost kept from v1.3.
by Maisa (David Villalón) · Maisa, diffusion-gemma · details
52.247.055.491.457.684.0%29.9%+54.1 ppann.$0.0260.24 sAPI
10
Jev-Omni
†Akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni revision c050d51354147985d13286cf4acf90f562f2c631, the author's own load_model.py (merged text decision model + 256-way head) and his own predict(), transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image; built on the CPU and moved to CUDA with every nn.Linear weight cast to bfloat16 first - the same cast his reference loader jev_omni.py applies - because our 46 GB GPU cannot hold his fp32 copy; on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by akhilaaa3 · akhilaaa3, Gemma-4-12B merged · details
51.346.864.181.553.088.7%32.1%+56.6 ppest.$0.0370.22 sRunPod GPU
11
metask-jev-4b
†Model card discloses 44.8k+16.1k+390 training rows incl. synthetic families intentionally mirroring JevBench hard families, plus repeated evaluation on all 231 public items (benchmark-directed development disclosed). Scan of 61 files: 0 exact matches.
by Wayfind (metask-ai) · details
47.844.766.989.154.579.7%27.6%+52.1 ppest.$0.0330.07 sRunPod GPU
12
SemIfby Theodore Lee (TheoLeeCJ) · formerly OpenJev (Qwen3.5-4B, TheoLeeCJ · details
47.744.466.883.759.581.0%26.3%+54.7 ppest.$0.0220.20 sRunPod GPU
13
Jobe Qwen3.5-4B
†No trained weights/LoRA/calibration fit; release explicitly rejects fitted temperature/order averaging. Scan of 37 files vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches.
by MantisShrimpdev · frozen · details
46.944.166.185.659.581.0%25.6%+55.3 ppest.$0.0220.13 sRunPod GPU
14
local-jev Qwen3.5-4B
†Scan of 72 files: 0 matches. Author discloses choosing JSON layout after observing results on the 231 public items (benchmark-directed choice, disclosed).
by Amith Chandrappa (amithgc) · details
46.844.473.375.055.880.5%26.0%+54.5 ppest.$0.0300.71 sRunPod GPU
15
system-one-openAPIby mithalouni · Gemma 4 E2B LoRA on an L4 · details
45.144.254.977.064.873.2%27.6%+45.6 ppest.$0.0150.65 sauthor demo
16
spark-s1-4b-v6
†Abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6 revision 93d49ddbfb29212e3296635a75a3e80cf69da027, code github.com/abhishek085/open-spark-jev 30ac6d89b7fa36c644cf86aac68f35c1d276a919, the author's own MenuScorer.decide with his fitted calibration.json temperature, bf16, base Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B, transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2 installed, causal_conv1d not installable here (no wheel builds against this toolchain), on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Abhishek Rai (abhishek085) · Open Spark Jev, abhishek085 · details
44.645.147.681.057.979.2%26.6%+52.6 ppest.$0.0250.31 sRunPod GPU
17
Malkuth-4B
†Dhtocks/malkuth-4b rev 11dc416995dab324803cb6c533f1d5c69e19d630 (rank-16 LoRA + pointer head over Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B-Base rev 1001bb4d826a52d1f399e183466143f4da7b741b), served by kev.serve from jaredpalmer/kev 557598fced1dada75dfbf36ed144dce309ac6ceb (the author's evaluation revision). The released head carries temperature 1.0 (no fitted temperature), although the card says calibrated. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (4B one-pass size class, as kev-4b), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by newfull5 (dhtocks) · newfull5, Kev post-train · details
44.543.161.588.361.574.9%23.4%+51.5 ppest.$0.0190.09 sRunPod GPU
18
jqv
†A stock Qwen3-32B with no decision training: the state is prefilled once, each question is an isolated branch and the answer is read from the option-letter logits, with one fitted temperature (3.02, 400 MMLU validation items). Re-run in v1.2.8 on our own GPU from the now-public serving code (Octalab-Inc/jqv 0189b67), so all 534 decisions including the held-out hard items were asked; this full run replaces the v1.2.7 partial row, which had been measured on the submitter's machine. Cost is the base model's public per-token tariff, not free.
by hjmurmur (Octalab) · Qwen3-32B zero-shot · details
44.446.471.674.647.580.1%28.2%+51.8 ppest.$0.0560.75 sRunPod GPU
19
Qwen3-Reranker-4B
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Qwen · details
43.544.665.278.749.268.0%29.9%+38.1 pp$0.0500.13 sRunPod GPU
20
decider-35b-a3b
†The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published FP8 weights, run serially on our H100 NVL. The exhaustive startup batch warmup was skipped; each required serial shape captured lazily before its measured request. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the closest hosted 35B-A3B input tariff and is not the temporary rental charge.
by Mapika · details
41.247.265.380.845.383.1%31.5%+51.6 ppest.$0.0670.29 sRunPod GPU
21
Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · details
41.046.429.187.659.769.7%27.3%+42.4 ppest.$0.0220.08 sRunPod GPU
22
OpenSourceJev
†DM submission, measure-only (JevBench publishing HOLD in force). Same author as the existing simplejev-qwen3.5-0.8b row (sabeel111/Featherless AI). Round-4 audit of an earlier commit could not be measured (no public GGUF, Windows-only DLL loader, unpinned llama.cpp build); this round the author published the exact unsloth Q4_K_M GGUF (hash/size independently verified) and we built llama.cpp CUDA from current upstream master on Linux ourselves -- its ABI matched the ctypes bindings exactly, so only a loader file-naming fix was needed (documented diff), no code/scoring/calibration change. Our public-231 subset exactly reproduced the author-reported table: easy 48/48, standard 67/72, hard 66/111, schema 231/231. Calibration (noul temperature) fit only on Google BoolQ, not JevBench. Repo docs name 3 public task IDs while describing benchmark-directed algorithm fixes on the public half (disclosed); 0 exact state/instruction text matches in a released-file scan.
by sabeel111 · Qwen3.5-4B Q4_K_M, native llama.cpp · details
40.941.860.382.064.078.4%26.3%+52.1 ppest.$0.016—unknown
23
ZeroEntropy zerank-2
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by ZeroEntropy · details
40.242.175.879.049.870.1%28.6%+41.6 pp$0.0470.13 sRunPod GPU
24
decision-machine-1
†A closed-weights decision model behind a production API that serves TypeSafe's wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it. Run on a free test key (30 requests a minute, 2.2 s between requests); the provider states the inference infrastructure is the same as for paid keys. Cost is the public paid tariff, $0.04 per million input tokens (output free), times the input tokens the API reported.
APIby milliseconds.ai (Baptiste Laget) · details
39.941.368.392.953.767.5%25.6%+41.9 pp$0.0350.17 sAPI
25
Malkuth-2B
†Dhtocks/malkuth-2b rev 401304b989451876070d83c488271b4f927d03ab (rank-16 LoRA + pointer head over empero-ai/Qwen3.8-2B-Distill rev e37a2dc4acc68ad75a91e07e63168cb04cc06345, fitted T=1.1755), served by kev.serve from jaredpalmer/kev 557598fced1dada75dfbf36ed144dce309ac6ceb. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (no hosted ~2B listed; the 4B price errs high, the decider-2b precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by newfull5 (dhtocks) · newfull5, Kev post-train · details
38.941.353.591.461.569.7%24.4%+45.3 ppest.$0.0190.04 sRunPod GPU
26
Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control, not JevBench-directed.
by Microsoft / neutral reproduction · details
38.041.858.888.849.665.8%29.2%+36.6 ppest.$0.0480.06 sRunPod GPU
27
JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4
†Byte-identical to upstream March-2026 NVFP4 checkpoint, predates JevBench v1.2, no task-specific training added. Had 3 preliminary scope/policy scoring errors corrected during review (pooled-ECE, full-run latency, cost estimate); score above is final corrected value.
by WilfLin · details
37.746.867.793.343.375.3%29.5%+45.8 ppest.$0.0770.02 sRunPod GPU
28
OpenJevby razorback16 / Codiv · DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16 · details
36.945.455.083.245.581.8%28.6%+53.2 ppest.$0.0660.24 sRunPod GPU
29
kev 4B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 306/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · research preview · details
36.142.139.675.761.866.2%22.4%+43.8 ppest.$0.0190.55 sRunPod GPU
30
Decision 2B
†Flymy-ai/decision-2b-preview revision df57b75db927acc9ad91ec8115508c1e487086eb (checkpoint minicpm5_reduced_v16_4k_v59), base openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B revision 12a3808a956f869c767195e9266b59c4d21d92e2, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by FlyMy.AI (@denti) · FlyMy.AI, v59 · details
35.838.874.184.362.575.3%26.0%+49.4 ppest.$0.0180.19 sRunPod GPU
31
Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2
†The author disclosed development on the public JevBench set and public-result comparisons; released-data overlap scan found no matches, but 764 gap and 382 replay training rows are unreleased.
by jsaurabh · details
35.247.461.382.042.478.4%29.2%+49.1 ppest.$0.083—unknown
32
GPT-6 Luna
†OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort low; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
APIby OpenAI · low reasoning effort · details
35.195.892.073.736.999.1%92.9%+6.3 pp$0.1271.44 sAPI
33
SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B
†Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
APIby Featherless AI · details
34.651.674.571.239.586.6%35.7%+50.9 ppest.$0.1041.01 sauthor demo
34
NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed
†Engine scan (1,758 files) vs 231 public tasks: 0 exact matches. Submitter discloses no training for Flash-Next but repeated consultation of public items and a public-hard temperature sweep.
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · details
34.049.578.688.238.989.6%34.1%+55.5 ppest.$0.1090.08 sRunPod GPU
35
swanOne
†Draft vocabulary derived via AGPL-3.0 generator (provenance recorded separately). Submitter consulted all 231 public tasks and swept temperature over 111 public hard tasks. Score corrected during review from pooled-534 ECE/latency to hard-tier/242-item block. blockbrain-ai/swanone-recipe abcca2e789316472e58d4e824b61c04f419c3ba5: Mia-AiLab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4 rev 925d7be6c14c6c9442ef83e8f05b5a3c39304f69 on vllm/vllm-openai:qwen38-flash-next@sha256:0aea3024… with MiaAI Lab's nine patched vLLM files (hash-verified) and the author's shim (option letters in the benchmark's order, the model's own renormalised letter mass, no temperature), H100.md serve command, here on an RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. The shim sends its own system prompt; structured state is rendered with json indent=1. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter qwen/qwen3.8-flash list price $0.15/M input (same underlying Flash-Next weights; the NInfer Flash-Next precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by blockbrain · blockbrain, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next NVFP4 · details
33.652.671.082.538.688.7%38.6%+50.1 ppest.$0.1110.28 sRunPod GPU
36
GPT-6 Luna
†OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort default medium; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
APIby OpenAI · default medium reasoning effort · details
33.397.493.572.636.099.6%95.5%+4.1 pp$0.1351.48 sAPI
37
open-alternative-jev
†With the options in reverse order (A. no, B. yes) the same model scored 21 % instead of 72 % on yes/no answer-judging items — small models are very sensitive to option order.
by IkerMoel · Qwen3.5-4B, IkerMoel · details
33.238.658.783.559.674.0%24.4%+49.7 ppest.$0.0220.21 sRunPod GPU
38
jev-local
†The author's local Jev-compatible server in its default full configuration: a frozen Qwen3.5-9B scores each option by its mean log-probability (one forward pass per option, no generation, no decision training). Run serially on our GPU. It re-reads the state once per option; if its reported token count covers one pass only, a per-token hosted price would be higher than this estimate.
by us (GitHub) · Qwen3.5-9B · details
32.545.264.269.243.374.9%29.5%+45.3 ppest.$0.0771.05 sRunPod GPU
39
Decision Fast
†Flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview revision 4225d41c66119fe28e95a2631bb0103decae6d56 (checkpoint qwen3_06b_headfirst_ep2a_v53), base Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base revision da87bfb608c14b7cf20ba1ce41287e8de496c0cd, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by FlyMy.AI (@denti) · FlyMy.AI, v53a · details
32.537.165.381.676.163.2%25.6%+37.6 ppest.$0.00630.24 sRunPod GPU
40
decider-2b
†The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published weights (Qwen3.5-2B-Base with a trained one-pass decision readout), run serially on our GPU. Self-host latency gets the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
by Mapika · details
30.738.543.583.261.071.0%24.7%+46.3 ppest.$0.0200.26 sRunPod GPU
41
jeff
†Self-hosted from its GitHub repo with server defaults, on our CPU (the author recommends a GPU, e.g. an L4), through the same TypeSafe-compatible API as Jev.
by Logan Markewich · Logan Markewich, GLiFormer 400M · details
30.636.867.963.576.662.8%33.1%+29.7 ppest.$0.00600.94 sCPU
42
Laya
†The English checkpoint (repo root), run on our CPU through its own `laya` package. Its budget is 512 tokens per question, so long hard-tier states are cut by the package itself.
by Convai Innovations · Convai Innovations, ModernBERT-large 421M · details
30.336.163.771.186.258.4%30.8%+27.6 ppest.$0.00290.79 sCPU
43
Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B IT
†Gemma 4 31B IT served through the Autoloops systemone API. Cost = the API's own token usage x Autoloops' published rates ($0.20/M input, $0.45/M output; no output tokens were used). API measurement: public and sealed item content reached the operator endpoint; no gold labels or answers were sent.
APIby Autoloops · details
30.059.879.284.036.092.8%45.8%+47.1 pp$0.1360.60 sAPI
44
Standard One 8B
†StandardThinking/StandardOne-8B rev 0f14d009a9400e55ea5a00a89b4d859882db704e (Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512 + LoRA, merged) on stock SGLang 0.5.20 behind the author's jev-adapter from server/ at the same revision, nominated configuration: --prompt-wording native --native-system-prompt none --default-temperature 1.35, context 8192. Disclosed by the author: benchmark-directed development; the native wording was selected by an ablation on the public hard tier; 181 of 359,497 training rows reuse one generic 58-character public-hard instruction. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter mistralai/ministral-8b-2512 list price $0.15/M input (= the author's proposed Mistral API price for the exact base), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by Standard Thinking (myeongho12) · details
29.146.265.992.039.476.6%26.6%+50.0 ppest.$0.1040.02 sRunPod GPU
45
lev-350m
†Weights franckverrot/lev-350m revision ab08ad8b8f346994d983152917e114224f6adac7, code github.com/franckverrot/lev c48a945dbf629998d7458dcc5c16f58df964db94, the author's own lev.serve /v1/systemone endpoint with its shipped calibration temperature, base LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Franck Verrot (franckverrot) · Franck Verrot, LFM2.5-350M · details
28.534.870.685.376.158.4%25.0%+33.4 ppest.$0.00630.17 sRunPod GPU
46
openjev-sglangAPIby ekzhang · Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on SGLang · details
27.749.469.277.136.585.3%33.1%+52.2 ppest.$0.1310.68 sauthor demo
47
Von
†The author disclosed that its temperature calibration map used the 231 public JevBench items; monotonic scaling does not change accuracy. Estimated cost is USD 0.00551 per 1,000 decisions.
by wfzyx (Victor Hugo) · wfzyx, Option-Marker 395M · details
27.534.575.770.577.857.1%27.9%+29.2 ppest.$0.0055—unknown
48
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4
†T=1.5 is an offline recomputation from raw logits of the same run, not a second execution. T=1.5 was chosen by sweeping public hard items (development-set calibrated, disclosed).
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · T=1.5 · details
26.951.576.080.135.283.1%33.1%+50.0 ppest.$0.1450.37 sRunPod GPU
49
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4
†Raw T=1.0 row. Author discloses repeated public-item consultation and public-hard tuning (applies to both NInfer 27B rows).
by Igor L. / NInfer contributors · details
26.351.567.280.135.283.1%33.1%+50.0 ppest.$0.1450.37 sRunPod GPU
50
kev 8B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview.
by Jared Palmer · research preview · details
25.641.840.274.944.071.4%21.8%+49.7 ppest.$0.0730.59 sRunPod GPU
51
JevOne
†Scan vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches. Training corpus/provenance not disclosed — overlap unknown.
by Juspay · details
25.547.677.688.535.989.6%33.8%+55.8 ppest.$0.1370.09 sRunPod GPU
52
typecastlm
†Typecastlm[server] 1.1.2 (wheel identical to git e95911e), checkpoint mihailgribov/typecastlm-qwen3.5-3.8b rev dcfecfdc28e44ef82631901628535b71574e27af: frozen Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B blocks 0-27 plus a computed 39-row head, one forward pass, four calibration temperatures by question type; transformers 5.3.0, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2. States over 32,768 tokens are folded in the middle, not refused. The server reads a noul question's meaning from the order of its two criteria (first = true), not from their keys. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (the exact base weights; one pass, no output), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by Mikhail Gribov · Mikhail Gribov, Qwen3.5-4B computed head · details
25.334.062.192.660.277.9%29.9%+48.1 ppest.$0.0210.03 sRunPod GPU
53
SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
†Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
APIby Featherless AI · details
24.945.759.875.038.181.4%28.2%+53.1 ppest.$0.1160.85 sauthor demo
54
kev 0.6B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · research preview · details
24.834.250.075.676.166.7%24.0%+42.6 ppest.$0.00630.59 sRunPod GPU
55
Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · details
23.745.724.186.341.968.4%26.3%+42.1 ppest.$0.0870.08 sRunPod GPU
56
system-oneby Sean Goedecke · Qwen3-8B, Sean Goedecke · details
23.443.632.884.441.571.9%24.4%+47.5 ppest.$0.0890.17 sRunPod GPU
57
OpenDecision
†A zero-shot NLI classifier behind a TypeSafe-compatible server, not a trained decision model: it scores each option as an entailment hypothesis with ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0. Its choice path runs several NLI passes over the same state, which the reported token count does not include, so a per-token hosted price would be higher than the estimate here. Pre-registered for our CPU in v1.2.7, run on our GPU because the CPU was far too slow.
by Deepan Wadhwa · ModernBERT-large zero-shot · details
21.631.857.179.975.353.2%25.6%+27.6 ppest.$0.00660.34 sRunPod GPU
58
LitJev
†The author's reproduction of Jev's decision layer on an off-the-shelf model, in its default configuration: Qwen3.8-27B, scores read from the output head, no training and no calibration file (its README says probabilities are not calibrated by default). Run serially on our GPU through an SSH tunnel, because its server binds to localhost; the request still crosses the internet and gets the ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
by Zhengxu Yu · Qwen3.8-27B · details
19.546.376.666.733.686.1%30.8%+55.3 ppest.$0.1632.03 sRunPod GPU
59
openJev Verdict 1.4
†Same public weights as the earlier Verdict row, run through the author's fixed v1.4 engine. That engine auto-loads the calibrator for every option count, frames candidate labels as NLI sentences and uses a 512-token context budget. Run locally on our CPU, serially.
by Hemant (heman10x) · details
19.029.472.078.182.457.6%27.9%+29.7 ppest.$0.00390.31 sCPU
60
kev 0.5B
†Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. This is the v0.1 release. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Jared Palmer · details
18.930.549.777.076.149.4%27.3%+22.1 ppest.$0.00630.43 sRunPod GPU
61
Bespoke Nimble 9B
†Re-run in v1.2.8 at Bespoke Labs' request after they raised the serving prompt limit from 2,048 to 8,192 tokens (bespokelabsai/nimble PR #4). Same recipe as the v1.1.3 run — the published LoRA merged into Qwen3.5-9B with the author's PEFT safe-merge, served with SGLang and the author's Jev-compatible API — now from current nimble main; the adapter weights are unchanged. Hard-tier accuracy rose from 43.6 % to 65.5 %, yet the score fell: the long hard items that used to fail at once are now answered and priced (so Cost fell), and this pod was in Canada while the v1.1.3 run's was in Sweden, so part of the lower Speed is network distance from our server in Germany. This complete run replaces the earlier row; its old score is kept in the artifact under superseded_rows.
by Bespoke Labs · details
18.746.356.478.733.479.7%28.9%+50.8 ppest.$0.1660.39 sRunPod GPU
62
GPT-5.6 LunaAPIby OpenAI · low reasoning effort · details
18.593.187.477.528.597.4%89.0%+8.4 pp$0.2420.97 sAPI
63
openJev Verdict
†The openJev-verdict-2.0 Hugging Face repo ships no weights; its config is byte-identical to heman10x/rlcd-modernbert-151m, whose published weights we ran with the author's engine. The 'verdict2-base' checkpoint behind the README's numbers is not downloadable yet (Git LFS 404); we will run it once it is.
by Hemant (heman10x) · heman10x, ModernBERT-base 151M · details
18.130.047.076.783.155.4%24.7%+30.7 ppest.$0.00370.28 sCPU
64
Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · details
18.133.224.389.764.954.1%26.0%+28.1 ppest.$0.0150.07 sRunPod GPU
65
reflex-27b
†The frozen public Qwen3.8-27B checkpoint through reflex at the requested pinned commit, with two option orders averaged and temperature 1. No adapter or fitted calibration file. Run serially on our H100 NVL. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment; cost uses the exact base model's public hosted input tariff.
by kshetrajna12 · Qwen3.8-27B · details
17.846.477.267.532.387.0%29.5%+57.5 ppest.$0.1811.89 sRunPod GPU
66
JevAct
†Requested in GitHub issue #66. The author published an endpoint and an evaluation client, not weights, and his API is not the TypeSafe wire format, so JevBench's own `jevact_api` adapter implements exactly the mapping table in his eval_code.zip: state to state, instructions to the question, the labels with their criteria text as the options in label order, noul as false/true, and results[0].options[i].probability read back as the probability of labels[i] by index. His server answers HTTP 400 with `all inference items exceeded max_context_tokens or contained reserved markers` for an input it cannot take, and his own client and test script record exactly that as one failed item and continue; the adapter therefore surfaces that one documented refusal as the harness's 422 refusal path, which scores it as a wrong answer and does not count toward the stop rule - the same treatment the swanOne and Cygnet packages get for their own 422. Any other 400 or an outage still stops the run. The endpoint reports no token accounting, so cost is the labelled 2B size-class estimate. The endpoint is one machine in China and the latency includes that distance; it is not a production API and gets the standard x2 self-host adjustment, without the +0.15 s that only our own servers carry. 237/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
APIby einptein · einptein, jev1-2b-v2 · details
16.929.355.176.564.361.9%23.4%+38.5 ppest.$0.0150.40 sauthor demo
67
djev
†Experimental full-generation path over the same DiffusionGemma checkpoint as djev-dev: thinking was enabled and the model could generate up to 8,192 tokens before returning its distribution. Current djev-dev itself hard-codes enable_thinking=false, diffusion_max_steps=1 and read_only=true, so this is not a switch in its published typed API. It is substantially slower/costlier, and 72/534 requests exhausted the output budget without a parseable distribution; those are failures. Cost uses measured tokens and a same-size hosted reference, not the H200 rental bill. 220/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by David Villalon / Maisa · thinking · details
15.271.687.875.226.987.4%60.1%+27.4 ppest.$0.2740.43 sRunPod GPU
68
GLiNER2 large
†The large checkpoint of Fastino's earlier GLiNER2 family, same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
by Fastino · details
15.131.124.861.773.356.7%28.6%+28.1 ppest.$0.00771.10 sCPU
69
OpenJev
†OpenJev's real typed-API thinking switch at think=512, using its own /v1/systemone server over BF16 DiffusionGemma. The thought is generated first, then native probability reads are taken after it. All 534 requests returned valid distributions. Cost counts the server's billed input and thought output tokens.
by razorback16 · thinking, BF16 · details
14.858.158.176.127.888.7%42.2%+46.5 ppest.$0.2550.46 sRunPod GPU
70
Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model
†JevLite SystemOne on CPU; bundled per-question calibration; no operator endpoint or network access. Local CPU measurement on the existing 534-decision v1.3 set plus 308 sealed v1.4 decisions; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
by Mourad Ghafiri · details
14.528.168.249.275.759.3%34.7%+24.6 ppest.$0.00657.15 sCPU
71
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
†307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
APIby Google · details
14.354.559.381.827.487.0%38.6%+48.4 pp$0.2640.76 sAPI
72
open-jev-deberta-v3-large
†297/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Kotoba Labs · local CPU · details
12.625.666.666.074.052.4%29.5%+22.8 ppest.$0.00731.77 sCPU
73
smalljev semantic-v9
†The public semantic-v9 LoRA and native heads over MiniCPM5-2B-Base, through the mapping frozen before the run. It has a typed Python contract but no TypeSafe-compatible HTTP route. The released training recipe explicitly hill-climbed against JevBench's public shape and source families; this allowed public benchmark-directed development is disclosed. Cost is $0.04/M measured input tokens, not free/100.
by Aditya (isHeSatoshi) · details
12.325.759.279.857.960.6%26.9%+33.7 ppest.$0.0250.41 sRunPod GPU
74
GLiNER2
†A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild. The question goes in front of the text; the probabilities are GLiNER2's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full (mapping fixed before the run).
by Fastino · Fastino, gliner2.5-base · details
11.827.425.271.883.158.0%29.2%+28.8 ppest.$0.00370.31 sCPU
75
Instinct
†Requested in GitHub issue #69. A free evaluation/demo endpoint that speaks TypeSafe's /v1/systemone wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it and no mapping of ours was involved; we registered the account and created the key ourselves in their console. The author states frozen Qwen3.8-27B base weights with no fine-tuning, read in one forward pass per question with no autoregressive decoding; the serving stack is not public, so nothing about it could be reviewed and the row rests on the API's own behaviour. Cost is an ESTIMATE: ZooWork publishes no bookable price, so the base model's public reference price is used (OpenRouter model-level qwen/qwen3.8-27b, $0.42/M input, zero output for a direct-logit readout); the author-announced tariff is not used. Classified as a free evaluation/demo endpoint (no SLA, no status page, no terms, pricing 'to be announced'), so the x2 latency adjustment applies. Re-scored when a bookable price is published.
APIby rayrain-srp (ZooWork) · ZooWork, Qwen3.8-27B · details
11.451.178.783.924.686.6%35.1%+51.5 ppest.$0.3250.26 sauthor demo
76
Open-Jev 9B
†The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
by Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai) · details
11.244.261.872.028.177.5%29.9%+47.6 ppest.$0.2490.75 sRunPod GPU
77
Open-Jev 2B
†The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
by Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai) · details
10.042.355.373.528.164.5%26.3%+38.2 ppest.$0.2490.66 sRunPod GPU
78
GLiNER2.5 multi
†The multilingual GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (287M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row. JevBench items are English only, so its multilingual training is not exercised here.
by Fastino · Fastino, 287M · details
9.823.157.267.882.448.9%32.8%+16.1 ppest.$0.00390.43 sCPU
79
CLM-8B
†Contrastive-LM/CLM commit cca045ffdb07b3ebcfe6938537cdeac5e14899c9, head Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B rev 87655cb835bd76fd66c2da78e1e3709f7fa11a94 (clm-latest), Qwen3-8B rev b968826d9c46dd6066d109eabc6255188de91218 last-token pooling via vLLM. Authors' documented system_one path: state + instructions as state text, each option description as a candidate action, softmax over contrastive scores at temperature 1.0. Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is in-process Engine.answer time on the serial standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is estimated at the Qwen3-Embedding-8B hosted list price ($0.01/M input, same-size 8B pooling encoder) over CLM's measured encoder tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
by Contrastive-LM (Kwok, Kang, Suresh, Saad-Falcon, Pavone, Ré, Mirhoseini) · Contrastive-LM, clm-latest · details
8.622.439.893.678.440.7%24.0%+16.7 ppest.$0.00520.02 sRunPod GPU
80
SimpleJev
†143 pinned files scanned: 0 exact matches. No JevBench-specific fine-tuning.
by sabeel111 / Featherless AI · Qwen3.5-0.8B, CPU · details
7.521.549.157.568.354.5%34.7%+19.8 ppest.$0.0113.99 sCPU
81
GLiNER2.5 small
†The small GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (74M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
by Fastino · Fastino, 74M · details
7.220.550.777.882.445.9%28.6%+17.3 ppest.$0.00390.11 sCPU
82
Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits
†Neutral raw-logit control.
by Alibaba Qwen / neutral reproduction · details
7.122.820.789.973.948.1%25.6%+22.4 ppest.$0.00740.07 sRunPod GPU
83
verdict-small
†Requested in GitHub issue #73. Run through the author's own `verdict serve` on our CPU, which speaks TypeSafe's /v1/systemone wire format, so JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter ran it and no mapping of ours was involved. A 118M multilingual bi-encoder: every option is scored against the rendered state by cosine similarity, at the model's own scale (temperature 1.0, no calibrator fitted on JevBench items, as the author states). Structured state is rendered as `key: value` lines by his own code. Code review before the run: the only network call is the Hugging Face download of his own checkpoint, no telemetry, no key, no rule written against public items. The `usage.input_tokens` his server reports is a word count and not a tokeniser count, so the cost is the labelled size-class estimate rather than a measured token price. Self-host latency gets the standard x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. The author's own public-set figures were easy 0.938, standard 0.486, hard 0.396 on an Apple M5 CPU. Offline measurement of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) on our own CPU through the author's server; no operator endpoint.
by Manavarya09 (Manav) · Manavarya09, multilingual-e5-small 118M · details
5.718.166.985.096.653.7%28.9%+24.8 ppest.$0.00130.05 sCPU
84
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
†298/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
APIby DeepSeek · thinking default · details
4.894.095.571.616.897.8%94.8%+3.0 pp$0.5941.42 sAPI
85
Mirror
†171 intended HTTP 422 context rejections (over 512-token limit) counted once each as misses; only 363/534 valid distributions returned. Found via Gmail submission (Lewis). 102/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
by Bluusun · details
2.113.626.070.873.341.1%9.1%+32.0 ppest.$0.00770.90 sauthor demo
86
Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Mixedbread · details
0.46.884.187.567.937.2%34.4%+2.8 pp$0.0120.07 sRunPod GPU
87
BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by BAAI · details
0.25.084.289.573.439.4%27.9%+11.5 pp$0.00770.03 sRunPod GPU
88
Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base
†Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
by Alibaba-NLP · details
0.24.878.990.669.633.8%33.4%+0.3 pp$0.0100.05 sRunPod GPU
89
Certo v1
†The public Certo v1 checkpoint through the author's DecisionModel, serially on our rented GPU. The question instruction is prepended to the state because Certo exposes state + runtime options but no separate question field; the published 64-token state and 48-token option limits are unchanged. The model card says v1 does not yet transfer to arbitrary natural-language prose. Cost is an estimate from same-size hosted encoders times the checkpoint's retained input tokens, not free/100.
by AltSlate Labs · details
0.00.183.094.0100.031.6%29.5%+2.1 ppest.$0.00100.02 sRunPod GPU
90
Open Jev JSON Canvas
†Returns only a final label, not a probability distribution — calibration counts as 0 in the composite. Scan of 39 files: 0 matches.
by JoshuaSP · details
0.048.20.084.145.684.4%31.2%+53.2 ppest.$0.0650.22 sRunPod GPU
—
classifier.dev
†Its own benchmark page says the fast tier is Jev. Free for us; the price is its published Pro plan ($20/month for 200,000 fast classifications a day) at full use, $0.0033 per 1,000 decisions.
APIby mrmps (@michael_chomsky) · fast tier · details
honorable mention · not ranked
70.851.672.487.684.385.3%34.4%+50.9 ppest.$0.00330.39 sAPI
—
Qwen3.8 27B
†69/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong); partial: Chutes rate limit stopped the run after 81/308 items; unranked as in v1.3
APIby Qwen / Chutes · Chutes TEE · details
partial · not ranked
0.040.493.661.30.071.9%21.8%+50.1 ppest.$2.6695.75 sAPI
—
Needle 3, options as tools
†V1.4: Not re-measured: same as needle-3.
by Cactus Compute · post-hoc adapter mode · details
partial · not ranked
—————22.1%——est.$0.0143.78 sCPU
—
Needle 3
†V1.4: Not re-measured: ~100-250 s per item on a rented CPU pod (19 s on Sandy); needs a dedicated CPU host.
by Cactus Compute · Cactus, 2-bit, local CPU · details
partial · not ranked
—————22.5%——est.$0.0241.69 sCPU

94 of 94 systems, sorted by official rank, #1 first.

API = the operator's endpoint received sealed item text during evaluation; the answers and item-level results are not published. The sealed text and answers remain private; only system-level aggregates appear here. Cost is per 1,000 decisions. Hover endpoint, cost and API labels for their recorded details.

All 87 system notes and disclosures
  • † Plumb-4B (crh225, JevK5 v0.2 + LoRA): Crh225/plumb-4b @ 55de037801a8a9b9de3db5c0e16cef86210c2186: merged bf16 weights, LoRA r16 on the attention projections of JevK5 v0.2 (itself Qwen3.5-4B), served by the author's documented command, jevk5 v0.2.0's own jevk5-serve (github.com/allebee/jevk5, Apache-2.0), unmodified. One forward pass per decision: softmax over the declared options' answer-letter logits at the last position divided by the package's own T = 2.07 (jevk5_config.json), up to 16 options, 0 generated tokens; inputs over 16,384 tokens are refused rather than truncated. Disclosed by the author: no JevBench item was trained or tuned on and every checkpoint and temperature choice came from his own held-out sets, but the 231 public items were scored after each of five training rounds and that aggregate feedback shaped the recipe (hard mining, long documents, document length) — development against the public distribution, stated plainly. His own overlap audit dropped 9 training items sharing more than two 8-word spans with a public item. Independent top-five gate (25 Sep 2026): LEGIT — cost basis (same as its JevK5 parent), public-versus-sealed gap against like-for-like rows, an 8-gram screen of its released training data (no row shares more than two 8-grams with a public item) and an exact composite recomputation. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium H100 80 GB (Hopper) pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate at the EmpirioLabs Qwen3.5-4B public pay-as-you-go list price ($0.04/M input, no output generated), applied to this system's measured tokens; it is not a GPU bill. 25 Sep 2026 pre-release correction: retired DeepInfra $0.03/M input reference replaced by bookable EmpirioLabs $0.04/M exact-base input reference; draft score 67.09 to 65.84.
  • † decider-4b v2 (Mapika): Decider-ai 1.2.2 (PyPI wheel identical to tag v1.2.2 abadc94), weights Mapika/decider-4b rev 7ab294cbdf6be6ac17fc818c10cdead744393d92 (decider_config version 4b-v2, T=1.935), uvicorn decider.serve:app. Disclosed by the author: 8,000 of the v2 LoRA rows come from generators written from the published names of the ten sealed families (no item read). Independent #1 gate (24 Sep): LEGIT. The author's private stage-2 training rows could not be audited for overlap with public items. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (4B dense size class, as decider-2b), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † JevK5 v0.2.0: Author says no JevBench items or outputs were used for training, tuning, or selection; public results are reported. Scan found only one generic instruction shared by 8 public hard items; unreleased teacher/replay corpora were unavailable.
  • † Cygnet (blockbrain, frozen Gemma-4-12B-it): Blockbrain-ai/cygnet-recipe 81974de: frozen google/gemma-4-12B-it rev 707f0a3b8a3c7ad586ed01e27eafbad8a27dd0f7 on unmodified vLLM 0.30.0 (image vllm/vllm-openai:v0.30.0@sha256:8a69ffad…), the author's shim: options as letters in the benchmark's label order, logits masked to the option letters, one calibration temperature T=3.4 fitted on the author's own items. The shim sends its own system prompt and renders structured state with json indent=1. Over-context/over-26-option inputs are HTTP 422 (a wrong answer). Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter google/gemma-3-12b-it list price $0.05/M input (the nearest hosted 12B Gemma; gemma-4-12b-it is not listed; the Winnow-12B / Jev-Omni precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † Hopper: Author discloses heavy public-benchmark-directed development (26 model/prompt configs, 20+ calibration-map variants observed against the public half); scan of 17 released files vs 231 public tasks found 0 state/instruction matches; training corpus not released so overlap not independently verifiable.
  • † Winnow-12B Q8: The submitted Q8_0 GGUF ran through the pinned author's TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone server with 8,192 context, four resident decision branches, Q8 KV, and full GPU offload. The private training corpus was not released. The author's checksum-based audit reports zero exact public-item overlap, but that claim cannot be independently reproduced; our scan found no exact public state or instruction text in the released artifacts. Cost uses the $0.05/M-input hosted Gemma 3 12B reference, not free/100.
  • † reflex 4B (kshetrajna12): The author's reflex-serve: Qwen3.5-4B with the published LoRA and its per-primitive calibration file; the state is encoded once and each question read from the label logits. Run serially on our GPU; the author discloses that the 231 public items were used four times as a development gate.
  • † djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma): The measured endpoint was Maisa's hosted API in free preview; the cost uses its announced price ($0.035 per million input tokens, output free), and nothing was charged. The self-hostable djev-dev runtime is Apache-2.0 and applies a structured one-step inference method to Google's Apache-2.0 diffusiongemma-26B-A4B-it checkpoint; it adds no separately trained djev weights. Probabilities are djev's own (its docs call them experimental and uncalibrated). v1.4: hosted api.djev.dev was paused by its operator ("Serving is paused by the administrator"); sealed tier measured on the public djev runtime (Davipar/djev-dev 3ce907e, same weights, default mode) self-hosted on an H100; Speed/Cost kept from v1.3.
  • † Jev-Omni (akhilaaa3, Gemma-4-12B merged): Akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni revision c050d51354147985d13286cf4acf90f562f2c631, the author's own load_model.py (merged text decision model + 256-way head) and his own predict(), transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image; built on the CPU and moved to CUDA with every nn.Linear weight cast to bfloat16 first - the same cast his reference loader jev_omni.py applies - because our 46 GB GPU cannot hold his fp32 copy; on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † metask-jev-4b: Model card discloses 44.8k+16.1k+390 training rows incl. synthetic families intentionally mirroring JevBench hard families, plus repeated evaluation on all 231 public items (benchmark-directed development disclosed). Scan of 61 files: 0 exact matches.
  • † Jobe Qwen3.5-4B (frozen): No trained weights/LoRA/calibration fit; release explicitly rejects fitted temperature/order averaging. Scan of 37 files vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches.
  • † local-jev Qwen3.5-4B: Scan of 72 files: 0 matches. Author discloses choosing JSON layout after observing results on the 231 public items (benchmark-directed choice, disclosed).
  • † spark-s1-4b-v6 (Open Spark Jev, abhishek085): Abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6 revision 93d49ddbfb29212e3296635a75a3e80cf69da027, code github.com/abhishek085/open-spark-jev 30ac6d89b7fa36c644cf86aac68f35c1d276a919, the author's own MenuScorer.decide with his fitted calibration.json temperature, bf16, base Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B, transformers 5.17.0 / torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2 installed, causal_conv1d not installable here (no wheel builds against this toolchain), on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Malkuth-4B (newfull5, Kev post-train): Dhtocks/malkuth-4b rev 11dc416995dab324803cb6c533f1d5c69e19d630 (rank-16 LoRA + pointer head over Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B-Base rev 1001bb4d826a52d1f399e183466143f4da7b741b), served by kev.serve from jaredpalmer/kev 557598fced1dada75dfbf36ed144dce309ac6ceb (the author's evaluation revision). The released head carries temperature 1.0 (no fitted temperature), although the card says calibrated. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (4B one-pass size class, as kev-4b), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † jqv (Qwen3-32B zero-shot): A stock Qwen3-32B with no decision training: the state is prefilled once, each question is an isolated branch and the answer is read from the option-letter logits, with one fitted temperature (3.02, 400 MMLU validation items). Re-run in v1.2.8 on our own GPU from the now-public serving code (Octalab-Inc/jqv 0189b67), so all 534 decisions including the held-out hard items were asked; this full run replaces the v1.2.7 partial row, which had been measured on the submitter's machine. Cost is the base model's public per-token tariff, not free.
  • † Qwen3-Reranker-4B: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † decider-35b-a3b (Mapika): The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published FP8 weights, run serially on our H100 NVL. The exhaustive startup batch warmup was skipped; each required serial shape captured lazily before its measured request. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the closest hosted 35B-A3B input tariff and is not the temporary rental charge.
  • † Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † OpenSourceJev (Qwen3.5-4B Q4_K_M, native llama.cpp): DM submission, measure-only (JevBench publishing HOLD in force). Same author as the existing simplejev-qwen3.5-0.8b row (sabeel111/Featherless AI). Round-4 audit of an earlier commit could not be measured (no public GGUF, Windows-only DLL loader, unpinned llama.cpp build); this round the author published the exact unsloth Q4_K_M GGUF (hash/size independently verified) and we built llama.cpp CUDA from current upstream master on Linux ourselves -- its ABI matched the ctypes bindings exactly, so only a loader file-naming fix was needed (documented diff), no code/scoring/calibration change. Our public-231 subset exactly reproduced the author-reported table: easy 48/48, standard 67/72, hard 66/111, schema 231/231. Calibration (noul temperature) fit only on Google BoolQ, not JevBench. Repo docs name 3 public task IDs while describing benchmark-directed algorithm fixes on the public half (disclosed); 0 exact state/instruction text matches in a released-file scan.
  • † ZeroEntropy zerank-2: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † decision-machine-1 (milliseconds.ai): A closed-weights decision model behind a production API that serves TypeSafe's wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it. Run on a free test key (30 requests a minute, 2.2 s between requests); the provider states the inference infrastructure is the same as for paid keys. Cost is the public paid tariff, $0.04 per million input tokens (output free), times the input tokens the API reported.
  • † Malkuth-2B (newfull5, Kev post-train): Dhtocks/malkuth-2b rev 401304b989451876070d83c488271b4f927d03ab (rank-16 LoRA + pointer head over empero-ai/Qwen3.8-2B-Distill rev e37a2dc4acc68ad75a91e07e63168cb04cc06345, fitted T=1.1755), served by kev.serve from jaredpalmer/kev 557598fced1dada75dfbf36ed144dce309ac6ceb. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (no hosted ~2B listed; the 4B price errs high, the decider-2b precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control, not JevBench-directed.
  • † JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4: Byte-identical to upstream March-2026 NVFP4 checkpoint, predates JevBench v1.2, no task-specific training added. Had 3 preliminary scope/policy scoring errors corrected during review (pooled-ECE, full-run latency, cost estimate); score above is final corrected value.
  • † kev 4B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 306/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Decision 2B (FlyMy.AI, v59): Flymy-ai/decision-2b-preview revision df57b75db927acc9ad91ec8115508c1e487086eb (checkpoint minicpm5_reduced_v16_4k_v59), base openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B revision 12a3808a956f869c767195e9266b59c4d21d92e2, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2: The author disclosed development on the public JevBench set and public-result comparisons; released-data overlap scan found no matches, but 764 gap and 382 replay training rows are unreleased.
  • † GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort): OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort low; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
  • † SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B: Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed: Engine scan (1,758 files) vs 231 public tasks: 0 exact matches. Submitter discloses no training for Flash-Next but repeated consultation of public items and a public-hard temperature sweep.
  • † swanOne (blockbrain, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next NVFP4): Draft vocabulary derived via AGPL-3.0 generator (provenance recorded separately). Submitter consulted all 231 public tasks and swept temperature over 111 public hard tasks. Score corrected during review from pooled-534 ECE/latency to hard-tier/242-item block. blockbrain-ai/swanone-recipe abcca2e789316472e58d4e824b61c04f419c3ba5: Mia-AiLab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4 rev 925d7be6c14c6c9442ef83e8f05b5a3c39304f69 on vllm/vllm-openai:qwen38-flash-next@sha256:0aea3024… with MiaAI Lab's nine patched vLLM files (hash-verified) and the author's shim (option letters in the benchmark's order, the model's own renormalised letter mass, no temperature), H100.md serve command, here on an RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. The shim sends its own system prompt; structured state is rendered with json indent=1. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter qwen/qwen3.8-flash list price $0.15/M input (same underlying Flash-Next weights; the NInfer Flash-Next precedent), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort): OpenAI direct API baseline; reasoning effort default medium; strict JSON-schema probability response; temperature unset; max_completion_tokens=4096; price cost from returned usage at official standard list rates.
  • † open-alternative-jev (Qwen3.5-4B, IkerMoel): With the options in reverse order (A. no, B. yes) the same model scored 21 % instead of 72 % on yes/no answer-judging items — small models are very sensitive to option order.
  • † jev-local (Qwen3.5-9B): The author's local Jev-compatible server in its default full configuration: a frozen Qwen3.5-9B scores each option by its mean log-probability (one forward pass per option, no generation, no decision training). Run serially on our GPU. It re-reads the state once per option; if its reported token count covers one pass only, a per-token hosted price would be higher than this estimate.
  • † Decision Fast (FlyMy.AI, v53a): Flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview revision 4225d41c66119fe28e95a2631bb0103decae6d56 (checkpoint qwen3_06b_headfirst_ep2a_v53), base Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base revision da87bfb608c14b7cf20ba1ce41287e8de496c0cd, the submitter's own FlyMyJevPackageAdapter and frozen calibrator, bf16, unmerged adapter, 4096-token packing, transformers 4.57.6 / peft 0.15.2 as pinned, torch 2.8.0 from the pod image, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † decider-2b (Mapika): The author's TypeSafe-compatible server and published weights (Qwen3.5-2B-Base with a trained one-pass decision readout), run serially on our GPU. Self-host latency gets the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
  • † jeff (Logan Markewich, GLiFormer 400M): Self-hosted from its GitHub repo with server defaults, on our CPU (the author recommends a GPU, e.g. an L4), through the same TypeSafe-compatible API as Jev.
  • † Laya (Convai Innovations, ModernBERT-large 421M): The English checkpoint (repo root), run on our CPU through its own `laya` package. Its budget is 512 tokens per question, so long hard-tier states are cut by the package itself.
  • † Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B IT: Gemma 4 31B IT served through the Autoloops systemone API. Cost = the API's own token usage x Autoloops' published rates ($0.20/M input, $0.45/M output; no output tokens were used). API measurement: public and sealed item content reached the operator endpoint; no gold labels or answers were sent.
  • † Standard One 8B (Standard Thinking): StandardThinking/StandardOne-8B rev 0f14d009a9400e55ea5a00a89b4d859882db704e (Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512 + LoRA, merged) on stock SGLang 0.5.20 behind the author's jev-adapter from server/ at the same revision, nominated configuration: --prompt-wording native --native-system-prompt none --default-temperature 1.35, context 8192. Disclosed by the author: benchmark-directed development; the native wording was selected by an ablation on the public hard tier; 181 of 359,497 training rows reuse one generic 58-character public-hard instruction. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: OpenRouter mistralai/ministral-8b-2512 list price $0.15/M input (= the author's proposed Mistral API price for the exact base), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † lev-350m (Franck Verrot, LFM2.5-350M): Weights franckverrot/lev-350m revision ab08ad8b8f346994d983152917e114224f6adac7, code github.com/franckverrot/lev c48a945dbf629998d7458dcc5c16f58df964db94, the author's own lev.serve /v1/systemone endpoint with its shipped calibration temperature, base LiquidAI/LFM2.5-350M, on our RunPod L40 in Czechia Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Von (wfzyx, Option-Marker 395M): The author disclosed that its temperature calibration map used the 231 public JevBench items; monotonic scaling does not change accuracy. Estimated cost is USD 0.00551 per 1,000 decisions.
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5): T=1.5 is an offline recomputation from raw logits of the same run, not a second execution. T=1.5 was chosen by sweeping public hard items (development-set calibrated, disclosed).
  • † NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4: Raw T=1.0 row. Author discloses repeated public-item consultation and public-hard tuning (applies to both NInfer 27B rows).
  • † kev 8B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview.
  • † JevOne: Scan vs 231 public tasks: 0 matches. Training corpus/provenance not disclosed — overlap unknown.
  • † typecastlm (Mikhail Gribov, Qwen3.5-4B computed head): Typecastlm[server] 1.1.2 (wheel identical to git e95911e), checkpoint mihailgribov/typecastlm-qwen3.5-3.8b rev dcfecfdc28e44ef82631901628535b71574e27af: frozen Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B blocks 0-27 plus a computed 39-row head, one forward pass, four calibration temperatures by question type; transformers 5.3.0, flash-linear-attention 0.5.2. States over 32,768 tokens are folded in the middle, not refused. The server reads a noul question's meaning from the order of its two criteria (first = true), not from their keys. Offline self-hosted inference of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB pod, through JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter against the author's own server on loopback; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is the serial request wall time on the standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is a labelled estimate: DeepInfra Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B list price $0.03/M input (the exact base weights; one pass, no output), read 2026-09-24, over the server's own usage.input_tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Author's no-login shared demo, model id recorded verbatim, one request at a time at or below its 2 RPS limit. SimpleJev reads answer-token logits and returns the complete distribution; it does not generate an answer. Speed uses the public-demo x2 load adjustment; cost uses a hosted size-class input price and is not free/100.
  • † kev 0.6B (research preview): Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. The author labels this checkpoint a research preview. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † OpenDecision (ModernBERT-large zero-shot): A zero-shot NLI classifier behind a TypeSafe-compatible server, not a trained decision model: it scores each option as an entailment hypothesis with ModernBERT-large-zeroshot-v2.0. Its choice path runs several NLI passes over the same state, which the reported token count does not include, so a per-token hosted price would be higher than the estimate here. Pre-registered for our CPU in v1.2.7, run on our GPU because the CPU was far too slow.
  • † LitJev (Qwen3.8-27B): The author's reproduction of Jev's decision layer on an off-the-shelf model, in its default configuration: Qwen3.8-27B, scores read from the output head, no training and no calibration file (its README says probabilities are not calibrated by default). Run serially on our GPU through an SSH tunnel, because its server binds to localhost; the request still crosses the internet and gets the ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment.
  • † openJev Verdict 1.4: Same public weights as the earlier Verdict row, run through the author's fixed v1.4 engine. That engine auto-loads the calibrator for every option count, frames candidate labels as NLI sentences and uses a 512-token context budget. Run locally on our CPU, serially.
  • † kev 0.5B: Self-hosted from the author's repository at commit 20fa626 through its native TypeSafe-compatible `/v1/systemone` server, BF16 on an RTX 3090; measured serially from Sandy over the internet. This is the v0.1 release. 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Bespoke Nimble 9B (Bespoke Labs): Re-run in v1.2.8 at Bespoke Labs' request after they raised the serving prompt limit from 2,048 to 8,192 tokens (bespokelabsai/nimble PR #4). Same recipe as the v1.1.3 run — the published LoRA merged into Qwen3.5-9B with the author's PEFT safe-merge, served with SGLang and the author's Jev-compatible API — now from current nimble main; the adapter weights are unchanged. Hard-tier accuracy rose from 43.6 % to 65.5 %, yet the score fell: the long hard items that used to fail at once are now answered and priced (so Cost fell), and this pod was in Canada while the v1.1.3 run's was in Sweden, so part of the lower Speed is network distance from our server in Germany. This complete run replaces the earlier row; its old score is kept in the artifact under superseded_rows.
  • † openJev Verdict (heman10x, ModernBERT-base 151M): The openJev-verdict-2.0 Hugging Face repo ships no weights; its config is byte-identical to heman10x/rlcd-modernbert-151m, whose published weights we ran with the author's engine. The 'verdict2-base' checkpoint behind the README's numbers is not downloadable yet (Git LFS 404); we will run it once it is.
  • † Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † reflex-27b (Qwen3.8-27B): The frozen public Qwen3.8-27B checkpoint through reflex at the requested pinned commit, with two option orders averaged and temperature 1. No adapter or fitted calibration file. Run serially on our H100 NVL. Self-host latency receives the standard ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment; cost uses the exact base model's public hosted input tariff.
  • † JevAct (einptein, jev1-2b-v2): Requested in GitHub issue #66. The author published an endpoint and an evaluation client, not weights, and his API is not the TypeSafe wire format, so JevBench's own `jevact_api` adapter implements exactly the mapping table in his eval_code.zip: state to state, instructions to the question, the labels with their criteria text as the options in label order, noul as false/true, and results[0].options[i].probability read back as the probability of labels[i] by index. His server answers HTTP 400 with `all inference items exceeded max_context_tokens or contained reserved markers` for an input it cannot take, and his own client and test script record exactly that as one failed item and continue; the adapter therefore surfaces that one documented refusal as the harness's 422 refusal path, which scores it as a wrong answer and does not count toward the stop rule - the same treatment the swanOne and Cygnet packages get for their own 422. Any other 400 or an outage still stops the run. The endpoint reports no token accounting, so cost is the labelled 2B size-class estimate. The endpoint is one machine in China and the latency includes that distance; it is not a production API and gets the standard x2 self-host adjustment, without the +0.15 s that only our own servers carry. 237/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † djev (thinking): Experimental full-generation path over the same DiffusionGemma checkpoint as djev-dev: thinking was enabled and the model could generate up to 8,192 tokens before returning its distribution. Current djev-dev itself hard-codes enable_thinking=false, diffusion_max_steps=1 and read_only=true, so this is not a switch in its published typed API. It is substantially slower/costlier, and 72/534 requests exhausted the output budget without a parseable distribution; those are failures. Cost uses measured tokens and a same-size hosted reference, not the H200 rental bill. 220/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † GLiNER2 large (Fastino): The large checkpoint of Fastino's earlier GLiNER2 family, same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
  • † OpenJev (thinking, BF16): OpenJev's real typed-API thinking switch at think=512, using its own /v1/systemone server over BF16 DiffusionGemma. The thought is generated first, then native probability reads are taken after it. All 534 requests returned valid distributions. Cost counts the server's billed input and thought output tokens.
  • † Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model (Mourad Ghafiri): JevLite SystemOne on CPU; bundled per-question calibration; no operator endpoint or network access. Local CPU measurement on the existing 534-decision v1.3 set plus 308 sealed v1.4 decisions; no operator endpoint received sealed text.
  • † Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 307/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † open-jev-deberta-v3-large (local CPU): 297/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † smalljev semantic-v9: The public semantic-v9 LoRA and native heads over MiniCPM5-2B-Base, through the mapping frozen before the run. It has a typed Python contract but no TypeSafe-compatible HTTP route. The released training recipe explicitly hill-climbed against JevBench's public shape and source families; this allowed public benchmark-directed development is disclosed. Cost is $0.04/M measured input tokens, not free/100.
  • † GLiNER2 (Fastino, gliner2.5-base): A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild. The question goes in front of the text; the probabilities are GLiNER2's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full (mapping fixed before the run).
  • † Instinct (ZooWork, Qwen3.8-27B): Requested in GitHub issue #69. A free evaluation/demo endpoint that speaks TypeSafe's /v1/systemone wire format, so the unchanged typesafe adapter ran it and no mapping of ours was involved; we registered the account and created the key ourselves in their console. The author states frozen Qwen3.8-27B base weights with no fine-tuning, read in one forward pass per question with no autoregressive decoding; the serving stack is not public, so nothing about it could be reviewed and the row rests on the API's own behaviour. Cost is an ESTIMATE: ZooWork publishes no bookable price, so the base model's public reference price is used (OpenRouter model-level qwen/qwen3.8-27b, $0.42/M input, zero output for a direct-logit readout); the author-announced tariff is not used. Classified as a free evaluation/demo endpoint (no SLA, no status page, no terms, pricing 'to be announced'), so the x2 latency adjustment applies. Re-scored when a bookable price is published.
  • † Open-Jev 9B (Zefan Cai): The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
  • † Open-Jev 2B (Zefan Cai): The author's pinned LoRA adapter, trained scalar decision head and calibration temperature, served by the author's Open-Jev server with prefix caching off, batch size 1 and 4,096-token limit. Serial requests were measured from Sandy over an SSH tunnel to the H100. Self-host latency receives the standing x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. Cost uses the exact Qwen3.5-9B hosted input tariff for 9B and the same conservative same-family proxy for the unlisted 2B; neither receives an automatic 100. Exact normalized comparison found no JevBench public task state or instruction in the 79,116-row public training projection.
  • † GLiNER2.5 multi (Fastino, 287M): The multilingual GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (287M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row. JevBench items are English only, so its multilingual training is not exercised here.
  • † CLM-8B (Contrastive-LM, clm-latest): Contrastive-LM/CLM commit cca045ffdb07b3ebcfe6938537cdeac5e14899c9, head Contrastive-LM/CLM-v0.1-8B rev 87655cb835bd76fd66c2da78e1e3709f7fa11a94 (clm-latest), Qwen3-8B rev b968826d9c46dd6066d109eabc6255188de91218 last-token pooling via vLLM. Authors' documented system_one path: state + instructions as state text, each option description as a candidate action, softmax over contrastive scores at temperature 1.0. Offline local open-weight inference on the frozen 308-item v1.4 set in a network-disabled, read-only container on an evaluator-owned Lium RTX PRO 6000 pod; no operator endpoint; no golds were exposed. Latency is in-process Engine.answer time on the serial standard+judge items with the self-hosted adjustment. Cost is estimated at the Qwen3-Embedding-8B hosted list price ($0.01/M input, same-size 8B pooling encoder) over CLM's measured encoder tokens; it is not a GPU bill.
  • † SimpleJev (Qwen3.5-0.8B, CPU): 143 pinned files scanned: 0 exact matches. No JevBench-specific fine-tuning.
  • † GLiNER2.5 small (Fastino, 74M): The small GLiNER2.5 checkpoint (74M), same family and same documented mapping as the GLiNER2 row: the question goes in front of the text and the probabilities are the model's own single-label softmax over the labels, read out in full. A general schema classifier, not a Jev rebuild.
  • † Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits: Neutral raw-logit control.
  • † verdict-small (Manavarya09, multilingual-e5-small 118M): Requested in GitHub issue #73. Run through the author's own `verdict serve` on our CPU, which speaks TypeSafe's /v1/systemone wire format, so JevBench's unchanged typesafe adapter ran it and no mapping of ours was involved. A 118M multilingual bi-encoder: every option is scored against the rendered state by cosine similarity, at the model's own scale (temperature 1.0, no calibrator fitted on JevBench items, as the author states). Structured state is rendered as `key: value` lines by his own code. Code review before the run: the only network call is the Hugging Face download of his own checkpoint, no telemetry, no key, no rule written against public items. The `usage.input_tokens` his server reports is a word count and not a tokeniser count, so the cost is the labelled size-class estimate rather than a measured token price. Self-host latency gets the standard x2 + 0.15 s adjustment. The author's own public-set figures were easy 0.938, standard 0.486, hard 0.396 on an Apple M5 CPU. Offline measurement of all 842 decisions (534 frozen v1.2 + 308 sealed v1.4) on our own CPU through the author's server; no operator endpoint.
  • † DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (thinking default): 298/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Mirror: 171 intended HTTP 422 context rejections (over 512-token limit) counted once each as misses; only 363/534 valid distributions returned. Found via Gmail submission (Lewis). 102/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong)
  • † Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base: Neutral documented reranker adapter; instruction and no-instruction public calibration were run, then frozen before one held-out pass.
  • † Certo v1 (AltSlate Labs): The public Certo v1 checkpoint through the author's DecisionModel, serially on our rented GPU. The question instruction is prepended to the state because Certo exposes state + runtime options but no separate question field; the published 64-token state and 48-token option limits are unchanged. The model card says v1 does not yet transfer to arbitrary natural-language prose. Cost is an estimate from same-size hosted encoders times the checkpoint's retained input tokens, not free/100.
  • † Open Jev JSON Canvas (JoshuaSP): Returns only a final label, not a probability distribution — calibration counts as 0 in the composite. Scan of 39 files: 0 matches.
  • † classifier.dev (fast tier): Its own benchmark page says the fast tier is Jev. Free for us; the price is its published Pro plan ($20/month for 200,000 fast classifications a day) at full use, $0.0033 per 1,000 decisions.
  • † Qwen3.8 27B (Chutes TEE): 69/308 sealed items answered validly (failures count as wrong); partial: Chutes rate limit stopped the run after 81/308 items; unranked as in v1.3
  • † Needle 3, options as tools (post-hoc adapter mode): V1.4: Not re-measured: same as needle-3.
  • † Needle 3 (Cactus, 2-bit, local CPU): V1.4: Not re-measured: ~100-250 s per item on a rented CPU pod (19 s on Sandy); needs a dedicated CPU host.

Rows without a † have no note beyond the shared provenance: every row was measured or re-run with its recorded recipe, and deviations are in its run manifest.

Artifact: v1.4.2.1 results JSON · SHA-256 e4c5ec1b5102… · JevBench v1.4.2.1 release and method

What changed in v1.4

  • Fresh sealed decisions keep the benchmark moving as public items saturate. Sealed items contribute 20% of Intelligence: I = 0.8 × I_v1.3 + 0.2 × I_sealed, where I_sealed = 100 × max(0, (acc_sealed − 0.293) / (1 − 0.293)). Public and sealed scores are published only as aggregates.
  • Calibration blends toward the sealed-inclusive result at the approved weight: C = C_v1.3 + (C_v1.4 − C_v1.3) × min(1, 0.2 / 0.35).
  • The k = 1 generalization penalty reduces Intelligence when public accuracy exceeds sealed accuracy by more than 25 percentage points: I × (1 − max(0, gap − 25) / 100). It rewards systems that generalize beyond the public half.
  • The four axes use an equal-weight harmonic mean (p = −1). Intelligence below 50 keeps its quadratic penalty; Speed and Cost each have a separate Jev-class gate below 50. Speed and Cost axis calculations are unchanged from v1.3.0.
  • The visible API flag discloses when an operator endpoint received held-out item text, without answers. Existing system notes preserve disclosures such as Hopper's public-half development and JevK5's public-set selection.
Explore Capability, cost and speed charts

JevBench v1.4.2.1 · additional views

Capability, cost and speed

Capability is the arithmetic mean of Intelligence and Calibration: (Intelligence + Calibration) / 2, on a 0–100 scale. Cost is USD per 1,000 decisions; its axis is logarithmic, and lower is better. Speed uses the JevBench Speed axis, where higher is faster. Estimated costs are marked.

2 placeholder rows have no published Intelligence or Calibration values and are omitted.

Top 20 by Capability

Capability with cost alongside

Each system has a wide Capability bar and a thin red cost line beneath it. The cost scale is logarithmic: a longer red line means higher cost, so shorter is cheaper.

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna (medium)API95.4Cost $0.14
  2. 2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAPI94.7Cost $0.59
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna (low)API93.9Cost $0.13
  4. 4GPT-5.6 LunaAPI90.3Cost $0.24
  5. 5djev79.7Cost $0.27 est.
  6. 6Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B ITAPI69.5Cost $0.14
  7. 7Qwen3.8 27BAPI67.0Cost $2.67 est.
  8. 8InstinctAPI64.9Cost $0.33 est.
  9. 9Jev 1.13.0API64.7Cost $0.040
  10. 10Plumb-4B64.2Cost $0.030 est.
  11. 11NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed64.1Cost $0.11 est.
  12. 12NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP463.7Cost $0.14 est.
  13. 13Hopper63.5Cost $0.024 est.
  14. 14SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27BAPI63.0Cost $0.10 est.
  15. 15JevOne62.6Cost $0.14 est.
  16. 16Cygnet62.2Cost $0.037 est.
  17. 17decider-4b v262.2Cost $0.020 est.
  18. 18classifier.devAPI62.0Cost $0.0033 est.
  19. 19reflex-27b61.8Cost $0.18 est.
  20. 20swanOne61.8Cost $0.11 est.
Show all 92 systems (72 more)
  1. 21JevK5 v0.2.061.7Cost $0.022 est.
  2. 22LitJev61.4Cost $0.16 est.
  3. 23openjev-sglangAPI59.3Cost $0.13 est.
  4. 24NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP459.3Cost $0.14 est.
  5. 25jqv59.0Cost $0.056 est.
  6. 26reflex 4B58.9Cost $0.022 est.
  7. 27ZeroEntropy zerank-258.9Cost $0.047
  8. 28local-jev Qwen3.5-4B58.9Cost $0.030 est.
  9. 29OpenJev58.1Cost $0.25 est.
  10. 30JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP457.3Cost $0.077 est.
  11. 31Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteAPI56.9Cost $0.26
  12. 32Winnow-12B Q856.6Cost $0.037 est.
  13. 33Decision 2B56.4Cost $0.018 est.
  14. 34decider-35b-a3b56.2Cost $0.067 est.
  15. 35Standard One 8B56.0Cost $0.10 est.
  16. 36metask-jev-4b55.8Cost $0.033 est.
  17. 37SemIf55.6Cost $0.022 est.
  18. 38Jev-Omni55.4Cost $0.037 est.
  19. 39Von55.1Cost $0.0055 est.
  20. 40Jobe Qwen3.5-4B55.1Cost $0.022 est.
  21. 41Qwen3-Reranker-4B54.9Cost $0.050
  22. 42decision-machine-1API54.8Cost $0.035
  23. 43jev-local54.7Cost $0.077 est.
  24. 44Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v254.4Cost $0.083 est.
  25. 45Open-Jev 9B53.0Cost $0.25 est.
  26. 46SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAPI52.8Cost $0.12 est.
  27. 47lev-350m52.7Cost $0.0063 est.
  28. 48jeff52.3Cost $0.0060 est.
  29. 49Malkuth-4B52.3Cost $0.019 est.
  30. 50Bespoke Nimble 9B51.4Cost $0.17 est.
  31. 51Decision Fast51.2Cost $0.0063 est.
  32. 52djev51.2Cost $0.026
  33. 53OpenSourceJev51.1Cost $0.016 est.
  34. 54openJev Verdict 1.450.7Cost $0.0039 est.
  35. 55Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits50.3Cost $0.048 est.
  36. 56OpenJev50.2Cost $0.066 est.
  37. 57Laya49.9Cost $0.0029 est.
  38. 58system-one-openAPI49.5Cost $0.015 est.
  39. 59Open-Jev 2B48.8Cost $0.25 est.
  40. 60open-alternative-jev48.6Cost $0.022 est.
  41. 61Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model48.2Cost $0.0065 est.
  42. 62typecastlm48.0Cost $0.021 est.
  43. 63Malkuth-2B47.4Cost $0.019 est.
  44. 64spark-s1-4b-v646.3Cost $0.025 est.
  45. 65open-jev-deberta-v3-large46.1Cost $0.0073 est.
  46. 66Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v245.5Cost $0.012
  47. 67BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m344.6Cost $0.0077
  48. 68OpenDecision44.4Cost $0.0066 est.
  49. 69verdict-small42.5Cost $0.0013 est.
  50. 70smalljev semantic-v942.4Cost $0.025 est.
  51. 71JevActAPI42.2Cost $0.015 est.
  52. 72kev 0.6B42.1Cost $0.0063 est.
  53. 73Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base41.9Cost $0.010
  54. 74Certo v141.5Cost $0.00097 est.
  55. 75decider-2b41.0Cost $0.020 est.
  56. 76kev 8B41.0Cost $0.073 est.
  57. 77kev 4B40.9Cost $0.019 est.
  58. 78GLiNER2.5 multi40.1Cost $0.0039 est.
  59. 79kev 0.5B40.1Cost $0.0063 est.
  60. 80openJev Verdict38.5Cost $0.0037 est.
  61. 81system-one38.2Cost $0.089 est.
  62. 82Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits37.7Cost $0.022 est.
  63. 83GLiNER2.5 small35.6Cost $0.0039 est.
  64. 84SimpleJev35.3Cost $0.011 est.
  65. 85Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits34.9Cost $0.087 est.
  66. 86CLM-8B31.1Cost $0.0052 est.
  67. 87Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits28.8Cost $0.015 est.
  68. 88GLiNER2 large28.0Cost $0.0077 est.
  69. 89GLiNER226.3Cost $0.0037 est.
  70. 90Open Jev JSON Canvas24.1Cost $0.065 est.
  71. 91Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits21.8Cost $0.0074 est.
  72. 92Mirror19.8Cost $0.0077 est.
Cost per 1,000 decisions · logarithmic · lower is better; free is at the left edge.
  • Jev (TypeSafe, closed)
  • Jev rebuild
  • Instruction model, JSON schema
  • Service built on Jev
  • Zero-shot classifier
  • Closed decision API
  • Reranker (neutral adapter)
  • Raw-logit control (base model)
  • Native-logit decision engine
  • system-one-open
  • Cost per 1,000 decisions · log scale (thin red line)
Red cost lines use the scale printed under the bars, from $0.00097 to $2.67 per 1,000 decisions. Free cost is placed at the cheapest edge; missing cost is shown as —.

Capability vs cost

The upper-left is the more attractive area: higher Capability and lower cost.

Capability vs costThe upper-left is the more attractive area: higher Capability and lower cost. Each point has a tooltip with the system and its values.020406080100$0.0010$0.010$0.10$1.00USD per 1,000 decisions · log scale · cheaper ←Capability · higher ↑GPT-6 Luna (medium) · JevBench rank 36 · Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.6.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · JevBench rank 84 · Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.6.GPT-6 Luna (low) · JevBench rank 32 · Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.7.GPT-5.6 Luna · JevBench rank 62 · Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.5.djev · JevBench rank 67 · Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.2.Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B IT · JevBench rank 43 · Capability 69.5 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.0.Qwen3.8 27B · Capability 67.0 · Cost $2.67 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.3.Instinct · JevBench rank 75 · Capability 64.9 · Cost $0.33 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.9.Jev 1.13.0 · JevBench rank 3 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3.Plumb-4B · JevBench rank 1 · Capability 64.2 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.5.NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed · JevBench rank 34 · Capability 64.1 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.2.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 48 · Capability 63.7 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.Hopper · JevBench rank 6 · Capability 63.5 · Cost $0.024 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.8.SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B · JevBench rank 33 · Capability 63.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.2.JevOne · JevBench rank 51 · Capability 62.6 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.5.Cygnet · JevBench rank 5 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.7.decider-4b v2 · JevBench rank 2 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.classifier.dev · Capability 62.0 · Cost $0.0033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.reflex-27b · JevBench rank 65 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.18 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.5.swanOne · JevBench rank 35 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.5.JevK5 v0.2.0 · JevBench rank 4 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1.LitJev · JevBench rank 58 · Capability 61.4 · Cost $0.16 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.7.openjev-sglang · JevBench rank 46 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.13 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.1.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 49 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.jqv · JevBench rank 18 · Capability 59.0 · Cost $0.056 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.6.reflex 4B · JevBench rank 8 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 68.0.ZeroEntropy zerank-2 · JevBench rank 23 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.047 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.0.local-jev Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 14 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.OpenJev · JevBench rank 69 · Capability 58.1 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.1.JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4 · JevBench rank 27 · Capability 57.3 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.3.Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · JevBench rank 71 · Capability 56.9 · Cost $0.26 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.8.Winnow-12B Q8 · JevBench rank 7 · Capability 56.6 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.3.Decision 2B · JevBench rank 30 · Capability 56.4 · Cost $0.018 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.3.decider-35b-a3b · JevBench rank 20 · Capability 56.2 · Cost $0.067 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.8.Standard One 8B · JevBench rank 44 · Capability 56.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.0.metask-jev-4b · JevBench rank 11 · Capability 55.8 · Cost $0.033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.1.SemIf · JevBench rank 12 · Capability 55.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.7.Jev-Omni · JevBench rank 10 · Capability 55.4 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.5.Von · JevBench rank 47 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.0055 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.5.Jobe Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 13 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.6.Qwen3-Reranker-4B · JevBench rank 19 · Capability 54.9 · Cost $0.050 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.decision-machine-1 · JevBench rank 24 · Capability 54.8 · Cost $0.035 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.jev-local · JevBench rank 38 · Capability 54.7 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 69.2.Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2 · JevBench rank 31 · Capability 54.4 · Cost $0.083 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.Open-Jev 9B · JevBench rank 76 · Capability 53.0 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.0.SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · JevBench rank 53 · Capability 52.8 · Cost $0.12 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.lev-350m · JevBench rank 45 · Capability 52.7 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.3.jeff · JevBench rank 41 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.0060 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 63.5.Malkuth-4B · JevBench rank 17 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.3.Bespoke Nimble 9B · JevBench rank 61 · Capability 51.4 · Cost $0.17 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.Decision Fast · JevBench rank 39 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.6.djev · JevBench rank 9 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.026 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.OpenSourceJev · JevBench rank 22 · Capability 51.1 · Cost $0.016 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.openJev Verdict 1.4 · JevBench rank 59 · Capability 50.7 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.1.Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits · JevBench rank 26 · Capability 50.3 · Cost $0.048 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.8.OpenJev · JevBench rank 28 · Capability 50.2 · Cost $0.066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.Laya · JevBench rank 42 · Capability 49.9 · Cost $0.0029 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.1.system-one-open · JevBench rank 15 · Capability 49.5 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.Open-Jev 2B · JevBench rank 77 · Capability 48.8 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.5.open-alternative-jev · JevBench rank 37 · Capability 48.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.5.Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model · JevBench rank 70 · Capability 48.2 · Cost $0.0065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 49.2.typecastlm · JevBench rank 52 · Capability 48.0 · Cost $0.021 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.6.Malkuth-2B · JevBench rank 25 · Capability 47.4 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.spark-s1-4b-v6 · JevBench rank 16 · Capability 46.3 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.0.open-jev-deberta-v3-large · JevBench rank 72 · Capability 46.1 · Cost $0.0073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.0.Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2 · JevBench rank 86 · Capability 45.5 · Cost $0.012 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.5.BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3 · JevBench rank 87 · Capability 44.6 · Cost $0.0077 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.5.OpenDecision · JevBench rank 57 · Capability 44.4 · Cost $0.0066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.9.verdict-small · JevBench rank 83 · Capability 42.5 · Cost $0.0013 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.0.smalljev semantic-v9 · JevBench rank 73 · Capability 42.4 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.8.JevAct · JevBench rank 66 · Capability 42.2 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.5.kev 0.6B · JevBench rank 54 · Capability 42.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.6.Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base · JevBench rank 88 · Capability 41.9 · Cost $0.010 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.6.Certo v1 · JevBench rank 89 · Capability 41.5 · Cost $0.00097 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 94.0.decider-2b · JevBench rank 40 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.kev 8B · JevBench rank 50 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.9.kev 4B · JevBench rank 29 · Capability 40.9 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.7.GLiNER2.5 multi · JevBench rank 78 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.8.kev 0.5B · JevBench rank 60 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.openJev Verdict · JevBench rank 63 · Capability 38.5 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.7.system-one · JevBench rank 56 · Capability 38.2 · Cost $0.089 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.4.Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits · JevBench rank 21 · Capability 37.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.GLiNER2.5 small · JevBench rank 81 · Capability 35.6 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.8.SimpleJev · JevBench rank 80 · Capability 35.3 · Cost $0.011 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 57.5.Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits · JevBench rank 55 · Capability 34.9 · Cost $0.087 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.3.CLM-8B · JevBench rank 79 · Capability 31.1 · Cost $0.0052 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.6.Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits · JevBench rank 64 · Capability 28.8 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.7.GLiNER2 large · JevBench rank 68 · Capability 28.0 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.7.GLiNER2 · JevBench rank 74 · Capability 26.3 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.8.Open Jev JSON Canvas · JevBench rank 90 · Capability 24.1 · Cost $0.065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.1.Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits · JevBench rank 82 · Capability 21.8 · Cost $0.0074 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.9.Mirror · JevBench rank 85 · Capability 19.8 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.8.
  1. Capability #1 · GPT-6 Luna (medium)
    Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 / 1,000 · Speed 72.6 · JevBench #36
  2. Capability #2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 / 1,000 · Speed 71.6 · JevBench #84
  3. Capability #3 · GPT-6 Luna (low)
    Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 / 1,000 · Speed 73.7 · JevBench #32
  4. Capability #4 · GPT-5.6 Luna
    Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 / 1,000 · Speed 77.5 · JevBench #62
  5. Capability #5 · djev
    Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated / 1,000 · Speed 75.2 · JevBench #67
92 systems plotted. Hover or focus a point to read its values.

Capability vs speed

The upper-right is the more attractive area: higher Capability and higher Speed.

Capability vs speedThe upper-right is the more attractive area: higher Capability and higher Speed. Each point has a tooltip with the system and its values.020406080100020406080100Speed axis · higher is faster →Capability · higher ↑GPT-6 Luna (medium) · JevBench rank 36 · Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.6.DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · JevBench rank 84 · Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.6.GPT-6 Luna (low) · JevBench rank 32 · Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.7.GPT-5.6 Luna · JevBench rank 62 · Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.5.djev · JevBench rank 67 · Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.2.Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B IT · JevBench rank 43 · Capability 69.5 · Cost $0.14 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.0.Qwen3.8 27B · Capability 67.0 · Cost $2.67 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.3.Instinct · JevBench rank 75 · Capability 64.9 · Cost $0.33 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.9.Jev 1.13.0 · JevBench rank 3 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3.Plumb-4B · JevBench rank 1 · Capability 64.2 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.5.NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed · JevBench rank 34 · Capability 64.1 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.2.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 48 · Capability 63.7 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.Hopper · JevBench rank 6 · Capability 63.5 · Cost $0.024 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.8.SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B · JevBench rank 33 · Capability 63.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.2.JevOne · JevBench rank 51 · Capability 62.6 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.5.Cygnet · JevBench rank 5 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.7.decider-4b v2 · JevBench rank 2 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.classifier.dev · Capability 62.0 · Cost $0.0033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.reflex-27b · JevBench rank 65 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.18 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.5.swanOne · JevBench rank 35 · Capability 61.8 · Cost $0.11 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.5.JevK5 v0.2.0 · JevBench rank 4 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1.LitJev · JevBench rank 58 · Capability 61.4 · Cost $0.16 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.7.openjev-sglang · JevBench rank 46 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.13 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.1.NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 · JevBench rank 49 · Capability 59.3 · Cost $0.14 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.1.jqv · JevBench rank 18 · Capability 59.0 · Cost $0.056 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.6.reflex 4B · JevBench rank 8 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 68.0.ZeroEntropy zerank-2 · JevBench rank 23 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.047 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.0.local-jev Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 14 · Capability 58.9 · Cost $0.030 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.OpenJev · JevBench rank 69 · Capability 58.1 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.1.JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4 · JevBench rank 27 · Capability 57.3 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.3.Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · JevBench rank 71 · Capability 56.9 · Cost $0.26 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.8.Winnow-12B Q8 · JevBench rank 7 · Capability 56.6 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.3.Decision 2B · JevBench rank 30 · Capability 56.4 · Cost $0.018 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.3.decider-35b-a3b · JevBench rank 20 · Capability 56.2 · Cost $0.067 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 80.8.Standard One 8B · JevBench rank 44 · Capability 56.0 · Cost $0.10 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.0.metask-jev-4b · JevBench rank 11 · Capability 55.8 · Cost $0.033 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.1.SemIf · JevBench rank 12 · Capability 55.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.7.Jev-Omni · JevBench rank 10 · Capability 55.4 · Cost $0.037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.5.Von · JevBench rank 47 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.0055 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.5.Jobe Qwen3.5-4B · JevBench rank 13 · Capability 55.1 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.6.Qwen3-Reranker-4B · JevBench rank 19 · Capability 54.9 · Cost $0.050 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.decision-machine-1 · JevBench rank 24 · Capability 54.8 · Cost $0.035 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9.jev-local · JevBench rank 38 · Capability 54.7 · Cost $0.077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 69.2.Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2 · JevBench rank 31 · Capability 54.4 · Cost $0.083 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.Open-Jev 9B · JevBench rank 76 · Capability 53.0 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 72.0.SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · JevBench rank 53 · Capability 52.8 · Cost $0.12 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.0.lev-350m · JevBench rank 45 · Capability 52.7 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.3.jeff · JevBench rank 41 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.0060 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 63.5.Malkuth-4B · JevBench rank 17 · Capability 52.3 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.3.Bespoke Nimble 9B · JevBench rank 61 · Capability 51.4 · Cost $0.17 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.7.Decision Fast · JevBench rank 39 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.6.djev · JevBench rank 9 · Capability 51.2 · Cost $0.026 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.OpenSourceJev · JevBench rank 22 · Capability 51.1 · Cost $0.016 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 82.0.openJev Verdict 1.4 · JevBench rank 59 · Capability 50.7 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 78.1.Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits · JevBench rank 26 · Capability 50.3 · Cost $0.048 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 88.8.OpenJev · JevBench rank 28 · Capability 50.2 · Cost $0.066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.Laya · JevBench rank 42 · Capability 49.9 · Cost $0.0029 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.1.system-one-open · JevBench rank 15 · Capability 49.5 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.Open-Jev 2B · JevBench rank 77 · Capability 48.8 · Cost $0.25 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 73.5.open-alternative-jev · JevBench rank 37 · Capability 48.6 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.5.Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model · JevBench rank 70 · Capability 48.2 · Cost $0.0065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 49.2.typecastlm · JevBench rank 52 · Capability 48.0 · Cost $0.021 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.6.Malkuth-2B · JevBench rank 25 · Capability 47.4 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.4.spark-s1-4b-v6 · JevBench rank 16 · Capability 46.3 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 81.0.open-jev-deberta-v3-large · JevBench rank 72 · Capability 46.1 · Cost $0.0073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 66.0.Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2 · JevBench rank 86 · Capability 45.5 · Cost $0.012 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.5.BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3 · JevBench rank 87 · Capability 44.6 · Cost $0.0077 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.5.OpenDecision · JevBench rank 57 · Capability 44.4 · Cost $0.0066 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.9.verdict-small · JevBench rank 83 · Capability 42.5 · Cost $0.0013 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 85.0.smalljev semantic-v9 · JevBench rank 73 · Capability 42.4 · Cost $0.025 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 79.8.JevAct · JevBench rank 66 · Capability 42.2 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.5.kev 0.6B · JevBench rank 54 · Capability 42.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.6.Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base · JevBench rank 88 · Capability 41.9 · Cost $0.010 per 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.6.Certo v1 · JevBench rank 89 · Capability 41.5 · Cost $0.00097 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 94.0.decider-2b · JevBench rank 40 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.020 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.2.kev 8B · JevBench rank 50 · Capability 41.0 · Cost $0.073 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 74.9.kev 4B · JevBench rank 29 · Capability 40.9 · Cost $0.019 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 75.7.GLiNER2.5 multi · JevBench rank 78 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 67.8.kev 0.5B · JevBench rank 60 · Capability 40.1 · Cost $0.0063 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.0.openJev Verdict · JevBench rank 63 · Capability 38.5 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 76.7.system-one · JevBench rank 56 · Capability 38.2 · Cost $0.089 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.4.Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits · JevBench rank 21 · Capability 37.7 · Cost $0.022 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 87.6.GLiNER2.5 small · JevBench rank 81 · Capability 35.6 · Cost $0.0039 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 77.8.SimpleJev · JevBench rank 80 · Capability 35.3 · Cost $0.011 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 57.5.Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits · JevBench rank 55 · Capability 34.9 · Cost $0.087 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 86.3.CLM-8B · JevBench rank 79 · Capability 31.1 · Cost $0.0052 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.6.Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits · JevBench rank 64 · Capability 28.8 · Cost $0.015 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.7.GLiNER2 large · JevBench rank 68 · Capability 28.0 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 61.7.GLiNER2 · JevBench rank 74 · Capability 26.3 · Cost $0.0037 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 71.8.Open Jev JSON Canvas · JevBench rank 90 · Capability 24.1 · Cost $0.065 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 84.1.Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits · JevBench rank 82 · Capability 21.8 · Cost $0.0074 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 89.9.Mirror · JevBench rank 85 · Capability 19.8 · Cost $0.0077 estimated per 1,000 decisions · Speed 70.8.
  1. Capability #1 · GPT-6 Luna (medium)
    Capability 95.4 · Cost $0.14 / 1,000 · Speed 72.6 · JevBench #36
  2. Capability #2 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
    Capability 94.7 · Cost $0.59 / 1,000 · Speed 71.6 · JevBench #84
  3. Capability #3 · GPT-6 Luna (low)
    Capability 93.9 · Cost $0.13 / 1,000 · Speed 73.7 · JevBench #32
  4. Capability #4 · GPT-5.6 Luna
    Capability 90.3 · Cost $0.24 / 1,000 · Speed 77.5 · JevBench #62
  5. Capability #5 · djev
    Capability 79.7 · Cost $0.27 estimated / 1,000 · Speed 75.2 · JevBench #67
92 systems plotted. Hover or focus a point to read its values.

All three at once

The 3D view plots Capability vertically, lower cost to the right, and higher Speed toward you. Sphere size follows the JevBench score. Drag to rotate; pinch or scroll to zoom. The view loads when it scrolls into view.

Scroll here to load the interactive 3D view.

Top five Jev-class systems by official JevBench Composite Score.

  1. Composite #1 · Plumb-4B
    Score 65.8 · Capability 64.2 · Cost $0.030 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 93.5 · Official JevBench #1
  2. Composite #2 · decider-4b v2
    Score 64.1 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.020 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 92.9 · Official JevBench #2
  3. Composite #3 · Jev 1.13.0
    Score 63.3 · Capability 64.7 · Cost $0.040 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 83.3 · Official JevBench #3
  4. Composite #4 · JevK5 v0.2.0
    Score 62.0 · Capability 61.7 · Cost $0.022 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 91.1 · Official JevBench #4
  5. Composite #5 · Cygnet
    Score 61.8 · Capability 62.2 · Cost $0.037 / 1,000 decisions · Speed 90.7 · Official JevBench #5

The interactive 3D view loads when this panel scrolls into view.

92 systems plotted; systems missing cost or Speed are omitted.