Hosting = where inference runs; company = where the provider or lab is registered.
EU hosting means the route's inference runs inside the EU: an EU region, AWS Bedrock's EU cross-region (geo) profiles, Azure's Europe Data Zone, or a provider whose entire public fleet is documented as EU-hosted, each checked per model against the provider's documentation. Global deployments do not count, and neither does an EU billing region, an EU company or an EU control plane on its own. One disclosed company-policy exception stays in, marked “EU equivalent”.
Data confidentialitywhat the provider may do with your prompts
More settings
Evidence requirements (benchmark evidence, priced provider, measured task tokens) sit above the table they apply to.
Applies to price views & model offers; benchmark evidence stays unfiltered.
JevBench is Benchmark Heaven's own benchmark for Jev-class decision models: state and a bounded rubric in, a typed answer out.
Frozen release · 1,624 decisions per system (904 open + 720 sealed; sealed decisions are half of Intelligence) · 98 ranked of 103 roster systems · only system-level sealed aggregates are published · aggregate results JSON sha256 6f2fa547454b…
Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits · Raw-logit control (base model)
Capability
15.6
Intelligence
9.7
Calibration
21.6
Cost Score
68.5
Cost per 1,000 decisions
$0.011 (0.35× Jev)
Median latency
0.28 s
Rank
Capability 55 · official #75
$0.0010$0.010$0.10$1.00
Wide coloured bar = Capability (0–100). Thin red line = cost per 1,000 decisions; log scale, each gridline = 10×, shorter is cheaper. * = est. (estimated cost). # counts ranked Jev-class systems; “–” marks unranked or outside systems. Tap ⓘ for the full values, median latency and cost relative to Jev.
Jev (TypeSafe, closed)
Jev rebuild
Instruction model, JSON schema
Small tool-calling model
Zero-shot classifier
Closed decision API
Reranker (neutral adapter)
Raw-logit control (base model)
Native-logit decision engine
Unclassified
system-one-open
Cost line
Outside the Jev-class limits · 43 systems
Show general-purpose LLMs and other systems outside the limits
Sorted by Capability, not numbered. Each row says which limit it misses, measured against Jev 1.13.0 ($0.032 per 1,000 decisions, median 0.62 s).
Needle 3, options as tools (post-hoc adapter mode) · Small tool-calling model
Capability
0.0
Intelligence
0.0
Calibration
0.0
Cost Score
61.6
Cost per 1,000 decisions
$0.019 (0.59× Jev)
Median latency
58.16 s
Rank
Capability outside Jev-class · official #91
Jev-class = cost per decision at most 2× Jev 1.13.0's (≤ $0.065 per 1,000 decisions)and median latency at most 2× Jev 1.13.0's (≤ 1.23 s, the adjusted p50 — the same median the speed chart plots, not the four-axis Speed score). 55 of 98 systems qualify; the other 43, including the general-purpose LLMs, are listed below the divider in the ranking. The charts below show speed and cost beside Capability; the official JevBench Score weighs all four axes.
Capability against cost and speed
Jev-class systems are shown by default. Bubble size follows the official JevBench Score. The five most capable Jev-class systems are labelled.
Capability vs cost
Upper right is best: more capable and cheaper. Cost is USD per 1,000 decisions on a log scale. The dashed line is 2× Jev’s cost.
55 systems. Hover or focus a bubbleTap a bubble for its values.
Capability vs speed
Upper right is best: more capable and faster. Speed here is the median-latency speed — the same adjusted median (p50) latency the Jev-class limit uses — a log scale, so each 20 points is 10× faster (median under the numbers). The dashed line is 2× Jev’s median latency.
55 systems. Hover or focus a bubbleTap a bubble for its values.
Jev (TypeSafe, closed)
Jev rebuild
Instruction model, JSON schema
Small tool-calling model
Zero-shot classifier
Closed decision API
Reranker (neutral adapter)
Raw-logit control (base model)
Native-logit decision engine
Unclassified
system-one-open
faint = outside Jev-class
What-If: the weight sliders below re-score every system under other axis weights — only the equal 25/25/25/25 weights give the official option-A ranking. The 3D view of capability, cost and speed loads further down.
JevBench v1.5.1
JevBench Composite Score: 98 ranked systems
Official· four axes 0–100, equal-weight harmonic mean · Method notes ↓
Cygnet and Winnow-12B Q8 are joint leaders (statistical tie).
Whiskers are 95% bootstrap intervals. 74 of 83 adjacent pairs with published paired-bootstrap comparisons are statistical ties — read the order as a ranking, not the gaps as significant. No paired comparison is published for the other 14 adjacent pairs, so no tie classification is inferred.
All 98 systems
Greener = stronger within its column.
98 of 98 systems, sorted by official rank, #1 first.
Weights are relative: each axis counts in proportion to its slider. The score stays a weighted harmonic mean with the low-axis gates; the gates still apply when an axis sits at 0. Only equal weights give the official JevBench Score and rank.
I, C, S, K = Intelligence, Calibration, Speed, Cost; the est. pill = estimated cost; ann. = announced price; API = the operator's endpoint saw sealed item text, without answers; $/1k decisions = US dollars per 1,000 decisions (not heat-shaded). Click a column heading to sort. Names link to each project.
Honorable mentions and Jev wrappers — listed separately, not ranked (1)
Eligibility rule: services that run on Jev itself may be measured and shown as honorable mentions, but are not competitors ranked against Jev and do not enter the field median gap (G_med) or tie markers. classifier.dev (TypeSafe) runs on Jev, so it stays unranked under this rule.
classifier.dev (fast tier)APIhonorable mention: runs on Jev (TypeSafe) - listed, not ranked (honorable mention, as in v1.4.2). Official (A) score 74.7.
Compare two systems
Pick any two. Four radars: the score axes, chance-corrected competence per request type on the open and sealed sets, and competence per tier on each set. Further out is better on every spoke; the link keeps the pair.
0–100, the values in the table. A system with no published axis draws at 0 and says so.
Competence per request type, open / sealed
Chance-corrected competence (0 = chance) for Choice, Noul and Score on the 904 open and 720 sealed decisions.
Competence per tier — open set
Per-tier competence, the three request types pooled by their published decision counts.
Competence per tier — sealed set
Per-tier competence on the sealed decisions, types pooled the same way; item text stays private.
All values as a table
Spoke
A: Jev 1.13.0
B: Cygnet
The four score axes
Intelligence
72.0
71.1
Calibration
88.0
87.0
Speed
83.8
91.0
Cost
54.7
56.4
Competence per request type, open / sealed
Choice · open
85.7
82.9
Choice · sealed
87.6
80.3
Noul · open
47.8
57.9
Noul · sealed
48.6
55.7
Score · open
81.2
76.6
Score · sealed
81.1
73.2
Competence per tier — open set
Easy
90.0
89.7
Standard
80.9
82.4
Judge
83.5
82.2
Hard
53.8
58.0
Competence per tier — sealed set
Easy
91.2
88.6
Standard
79.0
73.5
Judge
73.7
75.4
Hard
72.9
65.3
Axes, request types, latency and cost
Compare:
Every measured system, under the four score axes. Intelligence is 50% open (904 decisions) and 50% sealed (720); Gap = I_open − I_sealed, and the penalty applies only above the field median gap (G_med 5.2) plus 8. The per-type competence, latency and price of the same systems are in Types & cost. On a phone the name column stays put while the table scrolls sideways.
The same systems, by what was asked and what it cost. Per-type columns are chance-corrected competence (CC, 0 = chance) for Choice, Noul and Score, open / sealed; I open and I sealed are the two halves of Intelligence. Latency is adjusted p50 / p95; cost is per 1,000 decisions. On a phone the name column stays put while the table scrolls sideways.
API = the operator's endpoint received sealed item text during evaluation, without answers. Sealed item text, answers and item-level results stay private; only system-level aggregates appear here. Hover a cost for its price basis and a latency for its raw values and adjustment.
Official order with 95% intervals (98 systems)
JevBench v1.5.1 · headline option A
JevBench Score: 98 ranked systems
Official (A)weighted harmonic mean of four 0–100 axes, Intelligence · Calibration · Speed · Cost = 25 · 25 · 25 · 25, with the low-axis gates · Method ↓
Cygnet and Winnow-12B Q8 are joint leaders (statistical tie).
Whiskers are 95% bootstrap intervals. 74 of 83 adjacent pairs with published paired-bootstrap comparisons are statistical ties — read the order as a ranking, not the gaps as significant. No paired comparison is published for the other 14 adjacent pairs, so no tie classification is inferred.
1Cygnet73.7I 71 · C 87 · S 91 · K 56 · B#2 · C#1 · $0.028
2Winnow-12B Q873.2I 74 · C 84 · S 86 · K 57 · B#1 · C#2 · $0.028
3Jev 1.13.0API72.1I 72 · C 88 · S 84 · K 55 · B#3 · C#3 · $0.032
4JevK5 v0.3v1.5 roster addendum A171.9I 56 · C 88 · S 94 · K 63 · B#5 · C#8 · $0.017
5Plumb-4Bv1.5 roster addendum A171.6I 56 · C 87 · S 93 · K 63 · B#6 · C#9 · $0.017
6Jev-Omni71.5I 70 · C 83 · S 85 · K 56 · B#4 · C#4 · $0.029
7decider-4b v271.3I 56 · C 86 · S 91 · K 65 · B#7 · C#10 · $0.015
8Decision 4B v1.2v1.5 roster addendum A170.8I 54 · C 89 · S 94 · K 63 · B#9 · C#12 · $0.017
9Imajev-4Bv1.5 roster addendum A270.4I 53 · C 88 · S 91 · K 63 · B#11 · C#13 · $0.017
10Decision 4B v1.1v1.5 roster addendum A170.4I 53 · C 87 · S 94 · K 63 · B#12 · C#14 · $0.017
11SemIf68.7I 51 · C 84 · S 91 · K 63 · B#14 · C#19 · $0.017
12spark-s1-4b-v668.2I 62 · C 70 · S 86 · K 60 · B#8 · C#5 · $0.021
13metask-jev-4b67.5I 53 · C 83 · S 89 · K 58 · B#15 · C#16 · $0.026
14Hopper67.5I 50 · C 88 · S 87 · K 62 · B#18 · C#23 · $0.018
15Malkuth-4B66.8I 54 · C 83 · S 86 · K 56 · B#16 · C#15 · $0.030
16Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3v1.5 roster addendum A266.5I 70 · C 88 · S 86 · K 49 · B#10 · C#6 · $0.050
17reflex 4B65.2I 51 · C 87 · S 69 · K 63 · B#19 · C#20 · $0.017
18jev-local65.2I 56 · C 78 · S 73 · K 59 · B#17 · C#11 · $0.024
19djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma)64.2I 72 · C 80 · S 91 · K 48 · B#13 · C#7 · $0.053
20Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits62.1I 54 · C 53 · S 89 · K 63 · B#20 · C#18 · $0.017
21jqv60.8I 49 · C 87 · S 83 · K 51 · B#21 · C#25 · $0.042
22JevK5 v0.2.058.1I 47 · C 85 · S 91 · K 63 · B#22 · C#28 · $0.017
23Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v253.0I 60 · C 81 · S 82 · K 46 · B#23 · C#17 · $0.065
24Standard One 8B47.8I 60 · C 83 · S 92 · K 43 · B#26 · C#22 · $0.078
25NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed47.5I 67 · C 89 · S 89 · K 43 · B#24 · C#21 · $0.082
26swanOne46.6I 71 · C 87 · S 85 · K 42 · B#25 · C#24 · $0.085
27Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits45.2I 51 · C 49 · S 87 · K 46 · B#27 · C#30 · $0.065
28decider-2b45.1I 42 · C 72 · S 94 · K 65 · B#32 · C#32 · $0.015
29system-one44.1I 50 · C 49 · S 91 · K 45 · B#28 · C#33 · $0.068
30system-one-openAPI42.4I 42 · C 72 · S 78 · K 68 · B#33 · C#35 · $0.011
31Autoloops – Gemma 4 31B ITAPI40.5I 77 · C 86 · S 84 · K 40 · B#30 · C#26 · tariff$0.103
32GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort)API40.5I 95 · C 95 · S 73 · K 39 · B#29 · C#27 · $0.108
33GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort)API38.8I 96 · C 96 · S 73 · K 38 · B#31 · C#29 · $0.114
34JevOne38.2I 54 · C 85 · S 90 · K 40 · B#34 · C#34 · $0.101
35kev 4B38.1I 40 · C 68 · S 85 · K 66 · B#35 · C#38 · $0.014
36kev 8B34.2I 48 · C 71 · S 84 · K 40 · B#36 · C#40 · $0.097
37open-alternative-jev33.6I 37 · C 77 · S 91 · K 63 · B#38 · C#41 · $0.017
38Bespoke Nimble 9B31.8I 64 · C 77 · S 83 · K 37 · B#37 · C#31 · $0.128
39Malkuth-2B29.9I 36 · C 75 · S 92 · K 66 · B#41 · C#43 · $0.014
40openjev-sglangAPI29.0I 59 · C 83 · S 78 · K 36 · B#39 · C#36 · $0.140
41decider-35b-a3b27.5I 60 · C 82 · S 91 · K 34 · B#40 · C#37 · $0.154
42local-jev Qwen3.5-4B25.8I 34 · C 82 · S 84 · K 59 · B#44 · C#52 · $0.023
43Open-Jev 9B24.4I 64 · C 82 · S 74 · K 33 · B#42 · C#39 · $0.170
44Decision 2B22.5I 31 · C 86 · S 90 · K 66 · B#50 · C#54 · $0.013
45GPT-5.6 LunaAPI22.4I 94 · C 95 · S 74 · K 31 · B#43 · C#42 · tariff$0.205
46typecastlm21.8I 31 · C 77 · S 92 · K 64 · B#54 · C#56 · $0.016
47JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP420.1I 32 · C 81 · S 94 · K 48 · B#56 · C#57 · $0.056
48Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteAPI19.6I 78 · C 75 · S 80 · K 30 · B#45 · C#44 · tariff$0.219
49AutoJev-27B (denis-pplx, Qwen3.8-27B)v1.5 roster addendum A119.5I 73 · C 88 · S 88 · K 29 · B#46 · C#45 · $0.226
50AutoJev-27B (RTX PRO 6000)v1.5 roster addendum A219.5I 73 · C 87 · S 87 · K 29 · B#47 · C#46 · $0.226
51NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP418.7I 65 · C 86 · S 90 · K 29 · B#49 · C#47 · $0.231
52Eikos-27Bv1.5 roster addendum A118.5I 75 · C 86 · S 88 · K 29 · B#48 · C#48 · $0.238
53NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5)18.5I 61 · C 86 · S 90 · K 29 · B#52 · C#49 · $0.231
54InstinctAPI18.3I 63 · C 85 · S 82 · K 29 · B#53 · C#50 · $0.230
55OpenJev (thinking, BF16)17.9I 84 · C 83 · S 74 · K 29 · B#51 · C#51 · $0.241
56djev (thinking)17.4I 77 · C 96 · S 72 · K 28 · B#55 · C#53 · $0.249
57LitJev16.3I 58 · C 84 · S 68 · K 28 · B#57 · C#55 · $0.244
58Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits15.2I 28 · C 71 · S 89 · K 53 · B#59 · C#59 · $0.036
59OpenSourceJev13.2I 26 · C 76 · S 73 · K 69 · B#60 · C#60 · $0.011
60reflex-27b13.2I 63 · C 86 · S 69 · K 26 · B#58 · C#58 · $0.297
61Open-Jev 2B9.1I 34 · C 74 · S 76 · K 33 · B#61 · C#62 · $0.170
62GLiNER2 large8.4I 22 · C 42 · S 65 · K 78 · B#63 · C#63 · $0.0056
63Qwen3-Reranker-4B7.1I 21 · C 76 · S 80 · K 48 · B#64 · C#64 · $0.052
64DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAPI6.6I 94 · C 97 · S 69 · K 19 · B#62 · C#61 · $0.498
65SimpleJev4.0I 17 · C 47 · S 59 · K 70 · B#66 · C#66 · $0.0098
66SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27BAPI3.4I 73 · C 87 · S 75 · K 15 · B#65 · C#65 · $0.687
67decision-machine-1API3.2I 15 · C 81 · S 93 · K 56 · B#67 · C#67 · $0.029
68GLiNER2.5 multi2.7I 14 · C 58 · S 67 · K 87 · B#68 · C#68 · $0.0028
69GLiNER22.3I 13 · C 36 · S 70 · K 87 · B#69 · C#69 · $0.0028
70JevActAPI1.5I 11 · C 63 · S 76 · K 69 · B#71 · C#70 · $0.011
71CLM-8B1.5I 11 · C 48 · S 93 · K 51 · B#70 · C#71 · $0.045
72kev 0.6B1.3I 10 · C 68 · S 87 · K 80 · B#72 · C#72 · $0.0046
73Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits1.1I 11 · C 21 · S 90 · K 78 · B#73 · C#73 · $0.0056
74GLiNER2.5 small0.9I 9 · C 56 · S 77 · K 87 · B#75 · C#74 · $0.0028
75Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits0.9I 10 · C 22 · S 90 · K 69 · B#74 · C#75 · $0.011
76Mirror0.2I 6 · C 43 · S 64 · K 89 · B#76 · C#76 · $0.0023
77ZeroEntropy zerank-20.1I 5 · C 82 · S 80 · K 48 · B#77 · C#77 · $0.052
78jeff0.1I 4 · C 80 · S 56 · K 81 · B#78 · C#78 · $0.0043
79smalljev semantic-v90.1I 4 · C 73 · S 86 · K 61 · B#79 · C#79 · $0.020
80OpenDecision0.0I 2 · C 73 · S 87 · K 79 · B#80 · C#80 · $0.0050
81BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m30.0I 0 · C 83 · S 91 · K 59 · B#81 · C#81 · $0.023
82Certo v10.0I 0 · C 88 · S 91 · K 97 · B#82 · C#82 · $0.0013
83Decision Fast0.0I 0 · C 76 · S 91 · K 80 · B#83 · C#83 · $0.0046
84Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base0.0I 0 · C 75 · S 91 · K 69 · B#84 · C#84 · $0.011
85kev 0.5B0.0I 0 · C 65 · S 88 · K 80 · B#85 · C#85 · $0.0046
86Laya0.0I 0 · C 74 · S 74 · K 85 · B#86 · C#86 · $0.0032
87lev-350m0.0I 0 · C 78 · S 94 · K 80 · B#87 · C#87 · $0.0046
88Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model0.0I 0 · C 74 · S 72 · K 80 · B#88 · C#88 · $0.0048
89Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v20.0I 0 · C 87 · S 89 · K 60 · B#89 · C#89 · $0.021
90Needle 30.0I 0 · C 0 · S 34 · K 62 · B#90 · C#90 · $0.019
91Needle 3, options as tools0.0I 0 · C 0 · S 41 · K 62 · B#91 · C#91 · $0.019
92open-jev-deberta-v3-large0.0I 0 · C 77 · S 68 · K 78 · B#92 · C#92 · $0.0056
93Open Jev JSON Canvas0.0I 77 · C 0 · S 86 · K 49 · B#93 · C#93 · $0.049
94openJev Verdict0.0I 0 · C 52 · S 84 · K 87 · B#94 · C#94 · $0.0028
95openJev Verdict 1.40.0I 0 · C 80 · S 81 · K 87 · B#95 · C#95 · $0.0028
96Qwen3.8 27BAPI0.0I 96 · C 98 · S 57 · K 0 · B#96 · C#96 · $2.18
97verdict-small0.0I 0 · C 59 · S 82 · K 100 · B#97 · C#97 · $0.0009
98Von0.0I 0 · C 83 · S 76 · K 83 · B#98 · C#98 · $0.0038
Costs are estimates (est.) unless marked tariff.
system-one-openJev rebuildJev (TypeSafe, closed)UnclassifiedRaw-logit control (base model)Native-logit decision engineInstruction model, JSON schemaZero-shot classifierReranker (neutral adapter)Closed decision APISmall tool-calling model
All three weight options (98 systems)
All three weight options
A is the official headline: equal 25/25/25/25 axis weights and an Intelligence floor of 50. B remains the secondary 40/20/20/20 axis-weight view; C retains equal axes with an Intelligence floor of 60. All three use equal Choice/Noul/Score weights. The CI column is the paired-bootstrap 95% interval of the A score.
Among the 55 Jev-class systems, Jev 1.13.0 has the highest Capability, 80.0 (Intelligence 72.0, Calibration 88.0).
Cygnet leads the official JevBench v1.5.1 score (option A) with 73.7: Intelligence 71.1, Calibration 87.0, Speed 91.0, Cost 56.4 ($0.028 per 1,000 decisions).
The best open or open-planned rebuild, Winnow-12B Q8, is #2 at 73.2 — 0.5 points behind.
GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort) has the highest Intelligence (96.2) but places #33: Speed 73.2, Cost 38.3 — the harmonic mean does not let accuracy buy back a weak axis.
The strongest sealed Intelligence is 98.2 (Qwen3.8 27B, #96); sealed items carry half of Intelligence, and an open-minus-sealed gap beyond the field median plus eight points costs Intelligence.
74 of 83 adjacent pairs with published paired-bootstrap comparisons are statistical ties — read the order as a ranking, not the gaps as significant. No paired comparison is published for the other adjacent pairs, so no tie classification is inferred.
All 9 systems joined by separately hashed roster addenda and have official ranks in this revision; their A/B/C ranks and intervals are in the addendum table below.
classifier.dev scores 74.7 but is not ranked: runs on Jev (TypeSafe) - listed, not ranked (honorable mention, as in v1.4.2).
SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B did not complete the full suite; they are listed without a rank.
Jev alternatives, open source and self-hosting
The chart and table above compare the tested systems, not marketing claims. These are the practical answers readers most often need before choosing a Jev-class decision model.
What are open-source alternatives to Jev?
The highest-ranked open entrants in this run are Cygnet (#1, 73.7), Winnow-12B Q8 (#2, 73.2), JevK5 v0.3 (#4, 71.9), Plumb-4B (#5, 71.6). “Open” here means the tested row publishes code or weights; check the licence and exact configuration in the board before adopting one.
Which Jev-class models can I self-host in the EU or use for GDPR-sensitive work?
Open entrants with released code or weights can run on infrastructure you choose, including EU infrastructure. That can support data residency, but neither open source nor an EU server makes a deployment GDPR-compliant by itself. Assess your data, contracts, retention, subprocessors and security for the complete setup. See Benchmark Heaven's broader EU-hosting comparison.
jev-router.com offers self-hosted open decision models. Neutrality disclosure: it is run by the authors of this benchmark; it receives no scoring advantage and is not a ranked entrant.
How is JevBench scored?
The official score (option A) is the equal-weight harmonic mean of Intelligence, Calibration, Speed and Cost — 25/25/25/25 — with an Intelligence floor of 50 and low-axis gates on Speed and Cost. Version v1.5.1 measures 904 open and 720 sealed decisions per system; Choice, Noul and Score each carry a third, sealed items contribute 50% of Intelligence, and an open-minus-sealed gap beyond the field median costs points. Method notes · options B and C.
How do I submit my model?
Open an issue in the JevBench repository with a reproducible endpoint or runnable code, the exact model and licence, and whether public JevBench items were used during development. New entrants use the same frozen harness and appear in a new version or a disclosed roster addendum. For private data, see the custom evaluation options.
What a decision costs
Every price here is US dollars per 1,000 decisions — not per 1,000 tokens. One decision is a whole typed request — state, rubric and options — not a single token.
How costs are estimated
Systems with a public tariff (per token or per request) are priced at that tariff times the tokens we measured — 3 rows carry a tariff. Systems without one — open weights, author demos, models we ran ourselves — are priced as if a large inference provider hosted them: the list price of the same weights, or the nearest larger sibling or size class when the exact weights are not listed. We do not use per-minute GPU rental or our own CPU time — providers buy capacity in bulk or own the hardware, and price accordingly. Price × tokens per decision = $ per 1,000 decisions, marked “est.”.
Price rules (v1.5). Only public, bookable list prices that have been in effect for at least 30 days count; a manufacturer's standard, non-promotional launch list price counts from day one, and promotions, subsidies, credits and free tiers never do. The scoring price is never below the market reference price of the system's base model. A system without any eligible price is listed as unpriced — no Cost axis and no score until a price qualifies. A later price change triggers a re-score with a visible note on the row.
Cygnet — ~$0.028 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Winnow-12B Q8 — ~$0.028 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Jev 1.13.0 — ~$0.032 est. per 1,000 decisions: operator standard launch list price (interpretation I-1); no exact base-model floor applies
Jev-Omni — ~$0.029 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
decider-4b v2 — ~$0.015 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
SemIf — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
spark-s1-4b-v6 — ~$0.021 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
metask-jev-4b — ~$0.026 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Hopper — ~$0.018 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Malkuth-4B — ~$0.030 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
reflex 4B — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
jev-local — ~$0.024 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
djev (Maisa, diffusion-gemma) — ~$0.053 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Raw Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 direct logits — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
jqv — ~$0.042 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
JevK5 v0.2.0 — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Qwen3.5-9B Jev-like data-mix v2 — ~$0.065 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
Standard One 8B — ~$0.078 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
NInfer Qwen3.8-Flash-Next mixed — ~$0.082 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
swanOne — ~$0.085 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
Raw Qwen3 8B direct logits — ~$0.065 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
decider-2b — ~$0.015 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
system-one — ~$0.068 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
system-one-open — ~$0.011 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort) — ~$0.108 est. per 1,000 decisions: operator standard launch list price (interpretation I-1); no exact base-model floor applies
GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort) — ~$0.114 est. per 1,000 decisions: operator standard launch list price (interpretation I-1); no exact base-model floor applies
JevOne — ~$0.101 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
kev 4B — ~$0.014 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
kev 8B — ~$0.097 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
open-alternative-jev — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE (proxy tokens, I-2): exact base-model market reference; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Bespoke Nimble 9B — ~$0.128 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
Malkuth-2B — ~$0.014 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
openjev-sglang — ~$0.140 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
decider-35b-a3b — ~$0.154 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
local-jev Qwen3.5-4B — ~$0.023 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Open-Jev 9B — ~$0.170 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
Decision 2B — ~$0.013 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
typecastlm — ~$0.016 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
JEV Qwen3.5-9B Base NVFP4 — ~$0.056 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE (proxy tokens, I-2): exact base-model market reference
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 — ~$0.231 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
NInfer Qwen3.8-27B NVFP4 (T=1.5) — ~$0.231 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
Instinct — ~$0.230 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
OpenJev (thinking, BF16) — ~$0.241 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
djev (thinking) — ~$0.249 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
LitJev — ~$0.244 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits — ~$0.036 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
OpenSourceJev — ~$0.011 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
reflex-27b — ~$0.297 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
Open-Jev 2B — ~$0.170 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
GLiNER2 large — ~$0.0056 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
Qwen3-Reranker-4B — ~$0.052 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: hosted exact-model reference (deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3-Reranker-4B); no exact base-model floor applies
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — ~$0.498 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
SimpleJev — ~$0.0098 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
SimpleJev Qwen3.8-27B — ~$0.687 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
decision-machine-1 — ~$0.029 est. per 1,000 decisions: operator standard launch list price (interpretation I-1); no exact base-model floor applies
GLiNER2.5 multi — ~$0.0028 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
GLiNER2 — ~$0.0028 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
JevAct — ~$0.011 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
CLM-8B — ~$0.045 est. per 1,000 decisions: price floor: base-model reference price applied
kev 0.6B — ~$0.0046 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Raw Qwen3 0.6B direct logits — ~$0.0056 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
GLiNER2.5 small — ~$0.0028 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
Raw Qwen3 1.7B direct logits — ~$0.011 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Mirror — ~$0.0023 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
ZeroEntropy zerank-2 — ~$0.052 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: size-class proxy (deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3-Reranker-4B); no exact base-model floor applies
jeff — ~$0.0043 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
smalljev semantic-v9 — ~$0.020 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
OpenDecision — ~$0.0050 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
BAAI bge-reranker-v2-m3 — ~$0.023 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: base-model market reference (deepinfra:BAAI/bge-m3)
Certo v1 — ~$0.0013 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Decision Fast — ~$0.0046 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Alibaba GTE Reranker ModernBERT-base — ~$0.011 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: size-class proxy (deepinfra:thenlper/gte-base); no exact base-model floor applies
kev 0.5B — ~$0.0046 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Laya — ~$0.0032 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
lev-350m — ~$0.0046 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Qwen3.5-0.8B Decision Model — ~$0.0048 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
Mixedbread mxbai-rerank-base-v2 — ~$0.021 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: size-class proxy (deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B); no exact base-model floor applies
Needle 3 — ~$0.019 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
Needle 3, options as tools — ~$0.019 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
open-jev-deberta-v3-large — ~$0.0056 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
Open Jev JSON Canvas — ~$0.049 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
openJev Verdict — ~$0.0028 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
openJev Verdict 1.4 — ~$0.0028 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: v1.5 measured-input proxy; no exact base-model floor applies
Qwen3.8 27B — ~$2.18 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
verdict-small — ~$0.0009 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
Von — ~$0.0038 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; no exact base-model floor applies
classifier.dev — ~$0.023 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE (proxy tokens, I-2): operator list price: higher of 19 Sep plan cost and 26 Sep usage tariff USD 0.042/M input (rule 1.2); no exact base-model floor applies
JevK5 v0.3 — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Plumb-4B — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Decision 4B v1.2 — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Imajev-4B — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE (I-2): measured input tokens; zero generated output tokens for signed logits readout. M2 floor uses the 25 Sep 2026 DeepInfra Qwen3.5-4B snapshot rates (USD 0.03/M input, USD 0.15/M output); the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen3.5-9B.
Decision 4B v1.1 — ~$0.017 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate; reference deepinfra:Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B frozen at the 25 Sep cut-off; the snapshot records deprecation on 11 Jun 2026 and replacement by Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B; the frozen snapshot rates remain in use (I-3)
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 — ~$0.050 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: M2 base-model market reference from the frozen 25 Sep 2026 OpenRouter snapshot applied to measured tokens.
AutoJev-27B (denis-pplx, Qwen3.8-27B) — ~$0.226 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
AutoJev-27B (RTX PRO 6000) — ~$0.226 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: M2 base-model market reference from the frozen 25 Sep 2026 OpenRouter snapshot applied to measured tokens.
Eikos-27B — ~$0.238 est. per 1,000 decisions: documented hosted-model estimate
SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3B — ~$0.145 est. per 1,000 decisions: ESTIMATE: exact base-model market reference (operator tariff excluded by 30-day rule)
Roster addendum: newcomers scored on the same frozen protocol (9)
All 9 A1/A2 systems below completed all 1,624 decisions and now have official ranks in A, B, and C; the interactive score presets also include them. Their scores, individual 95% intervals, and the frozen v1.5.0 G_med are unchanged. No new paired-bootstrap comparisons were computed for addendum systems. Existing tie markers are retained only for base-system pairs that remain adjacent; no tie or separation is inferred for the other pairs.
Ranks follow option scores; score intervals are per system, not pairwise rank comparisons. Every slider preset sorts these same ranked systems using its selected weights.
Not ranked: partial, unpriced and unmeasured systems
These systems are part of the 103-system v1.5 roster but have no rank. Their numbers are never shown as zero or free.
Partial runs (1)
SimpleJev Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAPIpartial run: Partial run: 677 of 1,624 decisions answered; the missing ones count wrong and the row is not ranked.
Incomplete or not measured in v1.5 (3)
Jobe Qwen3.5-4B (frozen): not measured.
mica-v01-4bv1.5 roster addendum A1: The frozen refusal policy stopped the run after 1,088 of 1,624 rows: 27 documented refusals were mapped to HTTP 422, then three consecutive passthrough HTTP 400 refusals triggered exit 6. The remaining 536 rows have no scores, so this system is not eligible for an official rank. (1,088/1,624 rows; 536 missing).
OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16): not measured.
Incomplete and unmeasured systems receive no official rank. Existing results from earlier benchmark versions remain on their frozen version pages.
Method notes: what changed in v1.5
The four axes
Intelligence · 25%
How often answers are right above chance: each type is normalized against its task-specific random baseline (chance = 0, perfect = 100; below-chance tiers can be negative). Choice, Noul and Score count one third each. Easy, Standard, Judge and Hard items count 10%, 20%, 30% and 40%; the open and sealed sets count equally.
Calibration · 25%
How closely stated probabilities match what happens. It uses ECE and TVD for Choice, ECE and Brier for Noul, and normalized RPS plus top-level ECE for Score. The three types count equally; open and sealed items are pooled.
Speed · 25%
Serial response latency on open Standard and Judge items. The p50 and p95 each get a log score: 100 − 20 × log₁₀(seconds ÷ 0.1), then are averaged. Self-hosted and demo endpoints get the published ×2 plus 0.15-second adjustment.
Cost · 25%
Estimated or billed US dollars per 1,000 decisions, using pooled token use across 1,624 decisions and the documented price rules. The log score is 100 − 30 × log₁₀(cost ÷ $0.001). The price reference is $0.001 per 1,000 decisions.
The official score is the weighted harmonic mean of the four axes. Option A gives each axis 25%; option B (40/20/20/20) is a secondary view, while option C keeps equal axes and sets the Intelligence gate at 60. In A and B, Intelligence, Speed and Cost each have a quadratic gate below 50. To limit benchmaxxing on the public items, the open-minus-sealed Intelligence gap may be up to 8 points above the field median (G_med) before a penalty applies. Each further point lowers the multiplier on unpenalized Intelligence by one percentage point.
The method owner chose equal axis weights and equal weights for Choice, Noul and Score after reviewing the What-If Lab, preserving continuity with v1.4 and treating the three decision types equally. Disclosed headline amendment: equal-axis, equal-type A, SHA-256 752ddccc4e19…. B remains a secondary view.
1,624 decisions per system: 904 open (601 published) and 720 sealed, drawn fresh from a private pool with the same tier mix as the open set. Sealed counts for 50% of Intelligence: base = 0.5 × I_open + 0.5 × I_sealed.
Three request types are scored natively and chance-corrected per item: Choice, Noul and Score each receive one third. Tier weights easy / standard / judge / hard = 10 / 20 / 30 / 40. A type a system does not support is excluded, never scored zero; only full-coverage systems are ranked.
Overfit penalty relative to the field: excess = gap − G_med, penalty = max(0, 1 − max(0, excess − 8) / 100). G_med for this batch is 5.2 CC points.
Calibration is typed (Choice ECE/TVD, Noul ECE with Brier, Score normalised RPS and top-level ECE), pooled over open and sealed. Speed and Cost formulas are unchanged from v1.4; self-hosted and demo endpoints carry the ×2 + 0.15 s adjustment. A manufacturer's standard, non-promotional launch list price counts from day one, but a newer price cut younger than 30 days does not. Rows without token counts use the measured proxy-token basis. A system without any eligible public, bookable price is listed as unpriced.
The frozen 25 Sep DeepInfra snapshot records Qwen3.5-4B as deprecated on 11 Jun 2026 and replaced by Qwen3.5-9B. Its frozen snapshot rates remain the v1.5 M2 reference; price basis tooltips and the correction note disclose this. Pricing disclosure correction SHA-256: 1b660648bd49….
Composite: weighted harmonic mean with the Intelligence, Speed and Cost gates below 50 (Intelligence below 60 in option C). The official headline A uses equal 25 / 25 / 25 / 25 axis weights and Intelligence floor 50. B remains the secondary 40 / 20 / 20 / 20 view; C keeps equal axes and Intelligence floor 60. Ties come from the paired bootstrap.
The nine full-coverage systems marked with a v1.5 roster addendum label are officially ranked in A, B, C, and every score preset. Their scores, individual intervals, method, pricing rules and frozen G_med are unchanged. No new paired-bootstrap comparison is inferred for addendum pairs.
Before every release we review the leaderboard for anomalies and close loopholes with general, documented rules. The page and Git repository provide transparent data and method details; Benchmark Heaven owns its rules.
Data file SHA-256 6f2fa547454b1108fad701ef302f48450742562393d532d45eccd048f736a9e2 · scorer output SHA-256 452885de2a84cd5b9ed393d541fd8d6c6a540f9d7f762f9d2df9349383f26173 · run kind official.
Limits
1,624 decisions per system (904 open, 720 sealed) is a measurement, not a census, and it is English-only.
The weights are a choice. Option A weights the four axes equally and uses a harmonic mean, so the weakest axis dominates; options B and C are published alternatives and the weight sliders re-score the same axes for exploration — only the official option gives the official score and rank. If a wrong decision costs you more than a slow or expensive one, read the Intelligence column and the per-type competence rather than the score alone.
The latency adjustment (×2, +0.15 s on our own servers and demo endpoints) is an assumption, not a measurement. We ran the self-hosted and demo endpoints one request at a time (parallelism 1, no other load), so their latency is likely better than the same model on a busy production server. Serving under load trades per-user speed for throughput. The +0.15 s stands for infrastructure our self-hosted tests lacked: authentication, load balancing, logging, billing and an API gateway. Both numbers are assumptions; raw p50/p95 latencies are in the table and the repo.
Held-out decisions are sent to the evaluated services to get predictions. Not public is not the same as not seen.
Latency is one origin at one time of day; hosted endpoints, public demos and our own pods are different kinds of latency. Public demo endpoints are shared with everyone else using them.
Estimated costs describe what a large inference provider would charge for a model of that size, not what the author pays; a system on a tariff pays its tariff.
Credit
Harness, public tasks and every scoring rule: github.com/fstandhartinger/jevbench (MIT). Each project links its author's repository or vendor page.
Decision 2B (FlyMy.AI, v59) — FlyMy.AI (@denti), Apache-2.0 notices on the included code and the pinned base; the weights are an evaluation preview under EVALUATION-PERMISSION.md, not a cleared commercial release — huggingface.co/flymy-ai/decision-2b-preview
Decision 4B v1.1 (FlyMyJev, Qwen3.5-4B + LoRA) — unknown, not recorded
Decision 4B v1.2 (FlyMyJev, Qwen3.5-4B + LoRA) — unknown, not recorded
Decision Fast (FlyMy.AI, v53a) — FlyMy.AI (@denti), Apache-2.0 notices on the included code and the pinned base; the weights are an evaluation preview under EVALUATION-PERMISSION.md, not a cleared commercial release — huggingface.co/flymy-ai/decision-fast-preview
GPT-5.6 Luna (low reasoning effort) — OpenAI, proprietary API
GPT-6 Luna (default medium reasoning effort) — OpenAI, proprietary API
GPT-6 Luna (low reasoning effort) — OpenAI, proprietary API
Hopper — HopitAI, Component-specific terms recorded in RESULT.md; submitted adapter release and Qwen base retain their respective terms — huggingface.co/HopitAI/hopper
jev-local (Qwen3.5-9B) — us (GitHub), no licence stated in the repository (public code); Apache-2.0 base weights — github.com/us/jev-local
Jev-Omni (akhilaaa3, Gemma-4-12B merged) — akhilaaa3, Apache-2.0, following Gemma 4; dataset rights stated separately by the author — huggingface.co/akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni
Malkuth-2B (newfull5, Kev post-train) — newfull5 (dhtocks), CC-BY-NC-4.0, research use only (XNLI and RACE in the training mix) — github.com/newfull5/malkuth
Malkuth-4B (newfull5, Kev post-train) — newfull5 (dhtocks), CC-BY-NC-4.0, research use only (XNLI and RACE in the training mix) — github.com/newfull5/malkuth
Open-Jev 2B (Zefan Cai) — Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai), MIT (loader); Apache-2.0 (adapter and pinned Qwen base); CC0-1.0 public training projection — github.com/Zefan-Cai/Open-Jev
Open-Jev 9B (Zefan Cai) — Zefan Cai (@Zefan_Cai), MIT (loader); Apache-2.0 (adapter and pinned Qwen base); CC0-1.0 public training projection — github.com/Zefan-Cai/Open-Jev
openjev-sglang (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on SGLang) — ekzhang, no licence file in the repository as of 2026-09-19; Qwen3.6 weights keep their own terms — github.com/ekzhang/openjev-sglang
OpenSourceJev (Qwen3.5-4B Q4_K_M, native llama.cpp) — sabeel111, MIT (repository code); Apache-2.0 (Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B base and unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF Q4_K_M conversion) — github.com/sabeel111/OpenSourceJev
Plumb-4B (crh225, JevK5 v0.2 + LoRA) — unknown, not recorded
spark-s1-4b-v6 (Open Spark Jev, abhishek085) — Abhishek Rai (abhishek085), Apache-2.0 (code and weights); base Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B Apache-2.0 — github.com/abhishek085/open-spark-jev
Standard One 8B (Standard Thinking) — Standard Thinking (myeongho12), Apache-2.0 (jev-adapter server, LoRA and merged weights; base Ministral 3 8B Apache-2.0) — huggingface.co/StandardThinking/StandardOne-8B
Surogate Rune 26B-A4B v3 (RTX PRO 6000) — unknown, not recorded
swanOne (blockbrain, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next NVFP4) — blockbrain, patches Apache-2.0, shim MIT; weights under the Qwen licence (LICENSE-NOTICE.md) — github.com/blockbrain-ai/swanone-recipe
system-one (Qwen3-8B, Sean Goedecke) — Sean Goedecke, no licence file in the repository as of 19 Sep; Qwen3 weights Apache-2.0 — github.com/sgoedecke/system-one
system-one-open (Gemma 4 E2B LoRA on an L4) — mithalouni, MIT (repository LICENSE; Gemma weights keep Google’s terms) — github.com/mithalouni/system-one-open
Authors: if we tested the wrong configuration, tell us and we will rerun it. New entrants become a new version or a disclosed roster addendum rather than silently changing this one.