← All models

Claude Sonnet 5 (High)

deprecated by benchmark source
Anthropic · released 2026-06-30 · 14 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 5 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.
5AWS Bedrockdirect — Direct price: AWS Bedrock's own price list (https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

5 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

60.5

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Intelligence (est.): percentile 82AA Agentic: percentile 86Epoch ECI: percentile 67Software ECI: percentile 51DesignArena: percentile 67

AA Coding v4.x —Coding Agent v1.4 —AA Intelligence (est.) 20.1AA Agentic 44.3Epoch ECI 157.0Software ECI 155.2DesignArena 1228/1249

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

26 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

6 of 29 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-Briefcase651,178 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2731,308 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)625.1%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

  • τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run)8576.7%

    τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Multi-turn service agents making tool calls under strict policy constraints. (OpenRouter's own reproducible run, as published on openrouter.ai/benchmarks.)

  • LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement)584.8%

    LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Ranking of models as the orchestrator in LMArena’s Agent Mode, scored by the causal net improvement over the average model across behavioural signals from real sessions.

  • AA Agentic Index8644.3

    AA Agentic Index published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis publishes one Agentic Index per model, measured on its primary configuration and relayed by OpenRouter's Benchmarks API; the value is attached at family scope on the deterministic representative. Artificial Analysis publishes this board without a version number; we keep the date each result was retained.

Coding

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.17454.3%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor)developer's claim30.8%† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Agent evaluation on ambiguous, multi-file tasks drawn from real Cursor sessions.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)2648.2%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim39.4%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-014356.8%

    SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-01 → · SWE-rebench fixed ReAct scaffold, tool mode — A model resolves 111 fresh GitHub issues from 65 repositories, created between 15 May and 1 July 2026, inside one fixed minimal agent scaffold, run five times.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim52.7%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall)01,539 Elo

    LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Community pairwise-vote ranking of models on front-end web development tasks, including agentic multi-step coding, published by LMArena as a Bradley-Terry rating.

  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic)691,228 Elo

    DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) published 2026-11-03 → · Published board — Published Elo. Exact source attachment is retained; fewer than 200 battles excludes a row from radar normalization and anomaly peers.

  • DesignArena Full-Stack771,249 Elo

    DesignArena Full-Stack published 2026-11-03 → · Published board — Published Elo. Exact source attachment is retained; fewer than 200 battles excludes a row from radar normalization and anomaly peers.

Efficiency

Instruction-following

  • LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib)885,724

    LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib) v0.2.0 → · Published board — A model builds the longest chain of English words it can, each differing from the last by one letter, with no repeats and only dictionary words, from 50 starting words; any broken rule ends the chain.

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)429.4%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.17876.7%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

Science

  • CritPt (AA)8715.1%

    CritPt (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests research-level physics reasoning with Python, symbolic and numerical answers.

  • GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter run)5181.4%

    GPQA Diamond (OpenRouter run) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Graduate-level science questions that resist retrieval and reward careful reasoning. (OpenRouter's own reproducible run, as published on openrouter.ai/benchmarks.)

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.65232.1%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

Vision

  • Chartography 100-tasks412.2%

    Chartography 100-tasks → · Published board — Can a model read the charts professionals rely on — Kaplan-Meier curves, candlesticks, contour maps, Sankey diagrams, Bode plots, wind roses — from the image alone, to an expert-set precision?

Missing coverage · 293 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)71.528.0est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High)66.411.9est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)—20.1est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)—12.3est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)—17.6est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)—24.0est.

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $2.00 / 1M
Cached input $0.200 / 1M
Cache write $2.50 / 1M
Output $10.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 11 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

11 offers within the active global filters, 3 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (8)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure
Google
Amazon Bedrock
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Google
Google
Amazon Bedrock

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI

AWS Bedrock (1)

Direct prices from AWS Bedrock's own price list. Source: aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, collected 2026-11-03.

AWS Bedrock
Claude Sonnet 5 (High) — benchmarks & cost