← All models

Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)

deprecated by benchmark source
Anthropic · released 2026-06-30 · 14 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 5 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.
5AWS Bedrockdirect — Direct price: AWS Bedrock's own price list (https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

5 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

62.2

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Intelligence (est.): percentile 85Epoch ECI: percentile 67Software ECI: percentile 51DesignArena: percentile 67

AA Coding v4.x —Coding Agent v1.4 —AA Intelligence (est.) 24.0AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 157.0Software ECI 155.2DesignArena 1228/1249

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

24 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

6 of 24 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-Briefcase721,276 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2791,410 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)667.1%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

  • Scale SEAL: SWE-Bench Pro V2 HARD6988.2

    Scale SEAL: SWE-Bench Pro V2 HARD published 2026-09-22 → · Published board — Scale SEAL: SWE-Bench Pro V2 HARD results published by Scale AI.

Coding

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.17254.1%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor)developer's claim32.0%† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Agent evaluation on ambiguous, multi-file tasks drawn from real Cursor sessions.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)2949.7%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim42.7%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • GSO software optimization, Opt@1 (UC Berkeley) opt1-1027837.3%

    GSO software optimization, Opt@1 (UC Berkeley) opt1-102 → · OpenHands — An agent gets a real codebase and a performance test and must make the code as fast as an expert developer's optimization; 102 tasks across 10 codebases and 5 languages.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim56.2%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • Scale SEAL: SWE-Bench Pro V2 Full2293.2%

    Scale SEAL: SWE-Bench Pro V2 Full published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Scale AI’s refreshed public SWE-Bench Pro split (642 long-horizon tasks in 11 copyleft repositories) run under a locked protocol, scored by resolve rate.

Efficiency

  • CursorBench 4.0 cost per task (Cursor)developer's claim$4.55† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 cost per task (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Cursor's published USD cost per task for each CursorBench 4.0 model-effort configuration.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main cost per rollout (Cognition)developer's claim$10.07† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main cost per rollout (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Cognition's published mean USD spend per rollout for each FrontierCode 1.1 Main model and reasoning effort.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended cost per rollout (Cognition)developer's claim$8.23† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended cost per rollout (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Cognition's published mean USD spend per rollout for each FrontierCode 1.1 Extended model and reasoning effort.

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)5612.6%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.17876.7%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

Reasoning

  • Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI)6635.0%

    Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 novel chess positions generated programmatically by Epoch AI, each with a single Stockfish-verified best move; probes spatial reasoning and planning.

  • LiveBench 2026-06-254076.0

    LiveBench 2026-06-25 → · Published board — A periodically refreshed suite of objectively graded tasks with separate category scores and an overall category mean.

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.65434.5%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA6643.9%

    EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests enterprise workflows through MCP tools against resettable application environments.

Missing coverage · 295 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)71.528.0est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High)66.411.9est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)—20.1est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Low)—12.3est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Medium)—17.6est.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)—24.0est.

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $2.00 / 1M
Cached input $0.200 / 1M
Cache write $2.50 / 1M
Output $10.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 11 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

11 offers within the active global filters, 3 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (8)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure
Google
Amazon Bedrock
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Google
Google
Amazon Bedrock

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI

AWS Bedrock (1)

Direct prices from AWS Bedrock's own price list. Source: aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, collected 2026-11-03.

AWS Bedrock
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) — benchmarks & cost