← All models

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)

open weights
Google · released 2026-04-03 · 0 offers

Output 41 tokens/sFirst token 0.3 sContext 128K tokens

Top 0 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

No per-token pricing matches the active global filters.

Composite

1 of 7 inputs6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

7.9

dominance-adjusted from 10.7: a better-measured model that is at least as good on each of these inputs ranks above it

AA CodingCoding Agent v1.4AA IntelligenceAA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Intelligence: percentile 30

AA Coding Coding Agent v1.4 AA Intelligence 7.5AA Agentic Epoch ECI Software ECI DesignArena —/—

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

9 of 140 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

Compare this model →

Agentic

Instruction-following

Knowledge

Long-context

  • AA-LCR v1.12824.0%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

Reasoning

Science

Tool-use

Vision

Missing coverage · 135 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-09-19 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)9.48.9
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)7.5
Token offers by platform · 0 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

0 offers within the active global filters; “—” means the catalog is active but no public token price is available.

No token offers match the active global filters.

Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven