← All models

GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)

deprecated by benchmark source
OpenAI · released 2026-03-17 · 4 offers

Context 400K tokens

Top 2 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azure
2Azure AI Foundry

Composite

3 of 7 inputs · 1 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

52.7

includes −1.7 for its Benchmaxxing signal (from 54.4; why, switch off in Options)

AA CodingCoding Agent v1.4AA IntelligenceAA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding: percentile 63AA Intelligence: percentile 72Epoch ECI: percentile 38

AA Coding 56.1Coding Agent v1.4 AA Intelligence 21.2AA Agentic Epoch ECI 145.8Software ECI DesignArena —/—

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

24 of 140 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • APEX-Agents-AA5224.9%

    APEX-Agents-AA published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests professional-service tasks that require agents to produce locally graded deliverables.

  • AA-Briefcase30670 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2491,035 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Harvey LAB-AA752.2%

    Harvey LAB-AA published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests legal-work deliverables across practice areas on Harvey's private task set. Artificial Analysis' run, graded by one LLM judge against task rubrics — not the same run or scale as Vals AI's HLAB row.

  • ITBench-AA2524.4%

    ITBench-AA published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests root-cause diagnosis from offline Kubernetes incident snapshots.

  • Terminal-Bench Hard (AA)8942.4%

    Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) pinned revision 74221fb · Published board — Tests a pinned 44-task hard subset of terminal-based work using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA)5860.7%

    Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA) v2.1 · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 89-task verified refresh using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)400.5%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

Coding

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.15047.2%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • AA Coding Index6356.1

    AA Coding Index published 2026-09-19 · Published board — Artificial Analysis publishes this board without a version number; we keep the date each result was retained.

Instruction-following

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)397.8%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.18176.7%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

  • MLCR-AA195.0%

    MLCR-AA published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests medical-record synthesis and reasoning across long, fragmented case documents.

Reasoning

Safety/Alignment

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6356.0%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA2131.5%

    EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests enterprise workflows through MCP tools against resettable application environments.

  • τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)6876.0%

    τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) published 2026-09-10 · Published board — Tests dual-control telecom agents that coordinate tool use with a simulated user.

  • τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.16427.4%

    τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1 · Published board — Tests banking support agents that retrieve policies and change account state through tools.

Vision

Unusual results

2 threshold-crossing signals flagged · 25 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually weak Harvey LAB-AA published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.52236 fraction
    Peer mean 0.79402 · peer sd 0.17289 · n 43 · families 38
    Directed z -1.571 · baseline z 0.123 · gap -1.694 · profile n 24
    0.52236 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai
    Evidence
    Axis: Harvey LAB-AA · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.522362136343899 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:d4fc3f33-f2b0-4da1-88ee-f1f82bd4de31:harveyLab
  • unusually strong IFBench (AA single-turn) published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.75918 fraction
    Peer mean 0.48006 · peer sd 0.17139 · n 450 · families 331
    Directed z 1.629 · baseline z -0.011 · gap 1.639 · profile n 24
    0.75918 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai
    Evidence
    Axis: IFBench (AA single-turn) · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.759183673469388 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:d4fc3f33-f2b0-4da1-88ee-f1f82bd4de31:ifbench
Missing coverage · 119 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-09-19 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh)56.121.2
GPT-5.4 nano (medium)20.0
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning)11.7

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $0.200 / 1M
Cached input $0.020 / 1M
Output $1.25 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 3 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

3 offers within the active global filters; “—” means the catalog is active but no public token price is available.

OpenRouter (2)

Azure
Azure

Azure AI Foundry (1)

Azure AI Foundry
GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven