← All models

GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)

★ featured
OpenAI · released 2026-07-09 · 10 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 5 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1AWS Bedrockdirect — Direct price: AWS Bedrock's own price list (https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/), collected 2026-11-03.
2Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-terra/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-terra/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Azure AI Foundrydirect — Direct price: Azure AI Foundry's own price list (https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices), collected 2026-11-03.
5T-Systems LLM Hubdirect — Direct price: T-Systems LLM Hub's own price list (https://docs.llmhub.t-systems.net/models/llms/), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

7 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

47.8

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding v4.x: percentile 66Coding Agent v1.4: percentile 17AA Intelligence (est.): percentile 78Epoch ECI: percentile 79Software ECI: percentile 72DesignArena: percentile 18

AA Coding v4.x 58.1Coding Agent v1.4 38.6AA Intelligence (est.) 17.3AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 160.1Software ECI 159.6DesignArena 1105/1061

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

36 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

6 of 37 values are OpenAI's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-Briefcase551,014 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2621,178 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Terminal-Bench Hard (AA)9143.9%

    Terminal-Bench Hard (AA) pinned revision 74221fb → · Published board — Tests a pinned 44-task hard subset of terminal-based work using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA)6262.5%

    Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA) v2.1 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 89-task verified refresh using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)511.5%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

Coding

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.41438.6%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.4 v1.4 → · Codex — The retained AA Coding Agent Index measures coding-agent systems using the earlier three-component implementation.

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.15349.9%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor)developer's claim25.2%† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Agent evaluation on ambiguous, multi-file tasks drawn from real Cursor sessions.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)324.1%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim24.1%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Codex — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • VulcanBench Frontier v41459.7%

    VulcanBench Frontier v4 v4 → · Codex — 23 behavioural-reconstruction tasks: the model must repair a replacement implementation of a legacy program until hidden tests confirm it reproduces the program’s real drift from its written spec; the combined score weights functional correctness 50%, lint/complexity 8.5%, security 8.5% and judged Code quality 33%.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim37.8%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Codex — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-276658.1

    AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-27 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis withdrew the Coding Index with Intelligence Index v5.0 (2026-10-28). These are the last v4.x values, frozen with their own date (2026-10-27).

Efficiency

  • CursorBench 4.0 cost per task (Cursor)developer's claim$0.52† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 cost per task (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Cursor's published USD cost per task for each CursorBench 4.0 model-effort configuration.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main cost per rollout (Cognition)developer's claim$0.5† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main cost per rollout (Cognition) v1.1 → · Codex — Cognition's published mean USD spend per rollout for each FrontierCode 1.1 Main model and reasoning effort.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended cost per rollout (Cognition)developer's claim$0.45† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended cost per rollout (Cognition) v1.1 → · Codex — Cognition's published mean USD spend per rollout for each FrontierCode 1.1 Extended model and reasoning effort.

Instruction-following

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)7117.6%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.16871.3%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

  • MLCR-AA318.9%

    MLCR-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests medical-record synthesis and reasoning across long, fragmented case documents.

Reasoning

  • Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI)4822.0%

    Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 novel chess positions generated programmatically by Epoch AI, each with a single Stockfish-verified best move; probes spatial reasoning and planning.

  • Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI)2719.0%

    Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 mid-game positions of a well-known game whose identity Epoch deliberately keeps undisclosed, generated programmatically like Chess Puzzles.

Safety/Alignment

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.65129.1%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)5760.5%

    τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests dual-control telecom agents that coordinate tool use with a simulated user.

  • τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.15118.8%

    τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests banking support agents that retrieve policies and change account state through tools.

Uncensored

  • UGI Willingness222.20

    UGI Willingness published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A private-question evaluation of how far a model follows challenging instructions before refusing or deviating.

  • UGI8250.9

    UGI published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A private-question suite combining sensitive-topic knowledge with willingness to follow controversial instructions.

Vision

Writing

  • UGI Writing8556.8

    UGI Writing published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A maintainer-owned writing evaluation considering intelligence, style, repetition and length adherence, informed by human preferences.

Unusual results

1 threshold-crossing signal flagged · 28 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually weak DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15
    Why
    Observed: 0.24053 fraction
    Peer mean 0.56136 · peer sd 0.161 · n 63 · families 21
    Directed z -1.993 · baseline z 0.423 · gap -2.415 · profile n 27
    0.24053 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-15epoch.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) · published 2026-09-15 · mini-SWE-agent
    Exact value: 0.24053452115812918 fraction
    Evaluation harness: mini-SWE-agent
    Observed: 2026-09-15T09:05:24Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: public:c6c9d25cff4a24103d9a5625
Missing coverage · 283 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)76.732.2est.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Xhigh)70.627.8est.
GPT-5.6 Terra (High)67.124.0est.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Medium)64.718.4est.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low)58.117.3est.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)52.39.8est.

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $2.00 / 1M
Cached input $0.200 / 1M
Cache write $2.50 / 1M
Output $12.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 8 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

8 offers within the active global filters, 2 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

AWS Bedrock (1)

Direct prices from AWS Bedrock's own price list. Source: aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, collected 2026-11-03.

AWS Bedrock

OpenRouter (4)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/openai/gpt-5.6-terra/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Azureconditional
Azureconditional
Amazon Bedrockconditional
Azureconditional

Azure AI Foundry (2)

Direct prices from Azure AI Foundry's own price list. Source: prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure AI Foundry
Azure AI Foundry

T-Systems LLM Hub (1)

Direct prices from T-Systems LLM Hub's own price list. Source: docs.llmhub.t-systems.net/models/llms/, collected 2026-11-03.

T-Systems LLM Hub
GPT-5.6 Terra (Low) — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven