← All models

Fable 5 (high) (with fallback)

Anthropic · 9 offers

Top 4 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

5 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

79.9

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA IntelligenceAA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaCoding Agent v1.4: percentile 86AA Agentic: percentile 93Epoch ECI: percentile 85Software ECI: percentile 85DesignArena: percentile 76

AA Coding v4.x —Coding Agent v1.4 65.1AA Intelligence —AA Agentic 51.0Epoch ECI 163.0Software ECI 164.4DesignArena 1247/1280

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

19 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

4 of 22 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • ApprenticeBench CUA (NeoCognition)6935.0%

    ApprenticeBench CUA (NeoCognition) published 2026-09-14 → · Claude Code — A computer-use agent operates the Odoo ERP through its screens across 100 sequential accounts-payable tasks with diminishing mentoring.

  • τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run)9980.2%

    τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Multi-turn service agents making tool calls under strict policy constraints. (OpenRouter's own reproducible run, as published on openrouter.ai/benchmarks.)

  • LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement)798.3%

    LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Ranking of models as the orchestrator in LMArena’s Agent Mode, scored by the causal net improvement over the average model across behavioural signals from real sessions.

  • AA Agentic Index9351.0

    AA Agentic Index published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis publishes one Agentic Index per model, measured on its primary configuration and relayed by OpenRouter's Benchmarks API; the value is attached at family scope on the deterministic representative. Artificial Analysis publishes this board without a version number; we keep the date each result was retained.

Coding

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.47665.1%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.4 v1.4 → · Claude Code — The retained AA Coding Agent Index measures coding-agent systems using the earlier three-component implementation.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)7368.6%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim52.7%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • MirrorCode (Epoch AI, with METR)7563.9%

    MirrorCode (Epoch AI, with METR) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Long-horizon coding: models reimplement entire programs end-to-end without access to the original source, matching its output exactly on end-to-end tests including held-out tests.

  • SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-0110064.5%

    SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-01 → · SWE-rebench fixed ReAct scaffold, tool mode — A model resolves 111 fresh GitHub issues from 65 repositories, created between 15 May and 1 July 2026, inside one fixed minimal agent scaffold, run five times.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim64.3%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall)501,627 Elo

    LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Community pairwise-vote ranking of models on front-end web development tasks, including agentic multi-step coding, published by LMArena as a Bradley-Terry rating.

  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic)751,247 Elo

    DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) published 2026-11-03 → · Published board — Published Elo. Exact source attachment is retained; fewer than 200 battles excludes a row from radar normalization and anomaly peers.

  • DesignArena Full-Stack851,280 Elo

    DesignArena Full-Stack published 2026-11-03 → · Published board — Published Elo. Exact source attachment is retained; fewer than 200 battles excludes a row from radar normalization and anomaly peers.

Efficiency

Reasoning

  • Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI)8041.0%

    Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 novel chess positions generated programmatically by Epoch AI, each with a single Stockfish-verified best move; probes spatial reasoning and planning.

Science

Vision

  • Chartography 100-tasks5329.5%

    Chartography 100-tasks → · Published board — Can a model read the charts professionals rely on — Kaplan-Meier curves, candlesticks, contour maps, Sankey diagrams, Bode plots, wind roses — from the image alone, to an expert-set precision?

Unusual results

1 threshold-crossing signal flagged · 13 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually weak τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) — measured cost per task published 2026-09-15
    Why
    Observed: 0.96496 USD
    Peer mean 0.14611 · peer sd 0.24997 · n 117 · families 117
    Directed z -3.276 · baseline z 0.648 · gap -3.924 · profile n 12
    0.96496 USDmeasured· 300 tasks· 0.96 USD per task (measured by OpenRouter)observed 2026-09-15openrouter.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) — measured cost per task · published 2026-09-15 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.9649561966666667 USD
    Tasks evaluated: 300
    Published mean cost: 0.9649561966666667 USD per task (measured by OpenRouter) — measured by OpenRouter on τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) — measured cost per task
    Observed: 2026-09-15T23:29:03.209Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: openrouter-cost:anthropic/claude-5-fable-20260609|tau_bench_verified_airline
Missing coverage · 300 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)76.546.0est.
Fable 5 (low) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (xhigh) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (medium) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (high) (with fallback)——

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $10.00 / 1M
Cached input $1.00 / 1M
Cache write $12.50 / 1M
Output $50.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 6 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

6 offers within the active global filters, 3 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (4)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure
Amazon Bedrock
Google
Google

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI
Fable 5 (high) (with fallback) — benchmarks & cost