← All models

Fable 5 (xhigh) (with fallback)

Anthropic · 9 offers

Top 4 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

5 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

80.4

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA IntelligenceAA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaCoding Agent v1.4: percentile 90Epoch ECI: percentile 85Software ECI: percentile 85DesignArena: percentile 76

AA Coding v4.x —Coding Agent v1.4 66.0AA Intelligence —AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 163.0Software ECI 164.4DesignArena 1247/1280

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

13 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

4 of 13 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

Coding

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.48466.0%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.4 v1.4 → · Claude Code — The retained AA Coding Agent Index measures coding-agent systems using the earlier three-component implementation.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)8269.9%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim53.5%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • SWE Atlas Codebase QnA (Scale AI)2239.0%

    SWE Atlas Codebase QnA (Scale AI) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — How well a coding agent answers deep questions about a real codebase, graded against expert rubrics.

  • SWE Atlas Refactoring (Scale AI)6054.8%

    SWE Atlas Refactoring (Scale AI) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Whether a coding agent restructures production code while preserving its behaviour, graded by tests and rubrics.

  • SWE Atlas Test Writing (Scale AI)7855.6%

    SWE Atlas Test Writing (Scale AI) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Whether a coding agent writes production-grade tests for real repositories, graded with rubrics and LLM judges.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim64.9%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

Efficiency

Knowledge

  • SimpleQA Verified (run by Epoch AI)9470.7%

    SimpleQA Verified (run by Epoch AI) published 2026-09-16 → · Published board — Short fact-seeking questions answered without tools, testing whether a model knows a fact rather than guessing; Google DeepMind's cleaned version of OpenAI's SimpleQA, run by Epoch AI.

Safety/Alignment

Missing coverage · 306 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)76.546.0est.
Fable 5 (low) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (xhigh) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (medium) (with fallback)——
Fable 5 (high) (with fallback)——

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $10.00 / 1M
Cached input $1.00 / 1M
Cache write $12.50 / 1M
Output $50.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 6 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

6 offers within the active global filters, 3 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (4)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-fable-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure
Amazon Bedrock
Google
Google

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI
Fable 5 (xhigh) (with fallback) — benchmarks & cost