← All models

Claude Opus 5 (High)

deprecated by benchmark source
Anthropic · released 2026-07-24 · 16 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 5 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Azure AI Foundrydirect — Direct price: Azure AI Foundry's own price list (https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices), collected 2026-11-03.
5Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

7 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

83.8

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding v4.x: percentile 94Coding Agent v1.4: percentile 89AA Intelligence (est.): percentile 96Epoch ECI: percentile 89Software ECI: percentile 90DesignArena: percentile 81

AA Coding v4.x 76.5Coding Agent v1.4 65.6AA Intelligence (est.) 43.4AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 164.5Software ECI 166.4DesignArena 1254/1306

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

42 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

6 of 43 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-Briefcase951,557 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2931,629 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA)9387.6%

    Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA) v2.1 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 89-task verified refresh using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)9446.0%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

  • τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run)9879.6%

    τ²-Bench Airline (OpenRouter run) published 2026-09-15 → · Published board — Multi-turn service agents making tool calls under strict policy constraints. (OpenRouter's own reproducible run, as published on openrouter.ai/benchmarks.)

  • OSWorld 2.0, August 2026 task release (XLANG Lab) v2026.08.08no percentile29.0%

    OSWorld 2.0, August 2026 task release (XLANG Lab) v2026.08.08 → · batch tool — A computer-use agent completes 108 long-horizon, real-world workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop applications, each taking a person about 1.6 hours.

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals Index v2)8984.6%

    Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals Index v2) v2 → · Published board — Command-line interface problem solving; the page states that each index column is that benchmark's own published standalone score, so the runner is not asserted here.

  • LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement)899.8%

    LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Ranking of models as the orchestrator in LMArena’s Agent Mode, scored by the causal net improvement over the average model across behavioural signals from real sessions.

Coding

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.48065.6%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.4 v1.4 → · Claude Code — The retained AA Coding Agent Index measures coding-agent systems using the earlier three-component implementation.

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.18055.4%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor)developer's claim44.7%† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Agent evaluation on ambiguous, multi-file tasks drawn from real Cursor sessions.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)9072.8%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim48.0%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-017163.4%

    SWE-rebench, issues 15 May – 1 Jul 2026 (Nebius) 2026-05-15..2026-07-01 → · SWE-rebench fixed ReAct scaffold, tool mode — A model resolves 111 fresh GitHub issues from 65 repositories, created between 15 May and 1 July 2026, inside one fixed minimal agent scaffold, run five times.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim58.5%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall)791,662 Elo

    LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Community pairwise-vote ranking of models on front-end web development tasks, including agentic multi-step coding, published by LMArena as a Bradley-Terry rating.

  • AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-279476.5

    AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-27 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis withdrew the Coding Index with Intelligence Index v5.0 (2026-10-28). These are the last v4.x values, frozen with their own date (2026-10-27).

Efficiency

Instruction-following

  • LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib)10015,428

    LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib) v0.2.0 → · Published board — A model builds the longest chain of English words it can, each differing from the last by one letter, with no repeats and only dictionary words, from 50 starting words; any broken rule ends the chain.

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)7519.6%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.18479.0%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

  • MLCR-AA9859.4%

    MLCR-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests medical-record synthesis and reasoning across long, fragmented case documents.

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.67453.6%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.19344.7%

    τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests banking support agents that retrieve policies and change account state through tools.

Vision

  • MMMU Pro (AA)9182.4%

    MMMU Pro (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multimodal understanding using challenging ten-option questions.

  • Chartography 100-tasks3325.7%

    Chartography 100-tasks → · Published board — Can a model read the charts professionals rely on — Kaplan-Meier curves, candlesticks, contour maps, Sankey diagrams, Bode plots, wind roses — from the image alone, to an expert-set precision?

Unusual results

2 threshold-crossing signals flagged · 25 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually strong LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib)
    Why
    Observed: 15428.33 points
    Peer mean 2254.67038 · peer sd 3623.30948 · n 52 · families 44
    Directed z 3.636 · baseline z 1.144 · gap 2.492 · profile n 24
    15428.33 pointsmeasuredobserved 2026-09-16lisanbench.com ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: LisanBench word chains, v0.2.0 (Lisan al Gaib) · v0.2.0 · Published board
    Exact value: 15428.33 points
    Observed: 2026-09-16T19:06:45.428158+00:00 · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: public:a52264120c7ef75000affa98
  • unusually strong CritPt (AA) published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.28286 fraction
    Peer mean 0.04412 · peer sd 0.08179 · n 537 · families 370
    Directed z 2.919 · baseline z 1.173 · gap 1.746 · profile n 24
    0.28286 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: CritPt (AA) · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.282857142857143 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:712be54a-77ae-41b2-9a58-21181479d6ee:critpt
Missing coverage · 277 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Opus 5 (Max)78.047.8est.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)77.046.1est.
Claude Opus 5 (High)76.543.4est.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)74.334.6est.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)66.929.5est.
Opus 5 (none)——

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $5.00 / 1M
Cached input $0.500 / 1M
Cache write $6.25 / 1M
Output $25.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 12 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

12 offers within the active global filters, 4 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (8)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Google
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Google
Google
Amazon Bedrock

Azure AI Foundry (1)

Direct prices from Azure AI Foundry's own price list. Source: prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure AI Foundry

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI

AWS Bedrock (1)

Direct prices from AWS Bedrock's own price list. Source: aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, collected 2026-11-03.

AWS Bedrock
Claude Opus 5 (High) — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven