← All models

Claude Opus 5 (Max)

deprecated by benchmark source
Anthropic · released 2026-07-24 · 16 offers

Context 1M tokens

Top 5 cheapest providers (Adjusted $/task)

The same list price can give a different adjusted $/task (caching, token efficiency) — click a price for its inputs.

Within the active global provider, residency and confidentiality filters.

#ProviderAdjusted $/task
1Googlevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Google's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
2Amazon Bedrockvia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Amazon Bedrock's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
3Azurevia OpenRouter — Price via OpenRouter: OpenRouter's price for Azure's endpoint (https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers), collected 2026-11-03.
4Azure AI Foundrydirect — Direct price: Azure AI Foundry's own price list (https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices), collected 2026-11-03.
5Google Vertex AIdirect — Direct price: Google Vertex AI's own price list (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing), collected 2026-11-03.

Composite

7 of 7 inputs · 4 from the model family6 radar axes: DesignArena's two boards share one

86.0

AA Coding v4.xCoding Agent v1.4AA Intelligence (est.)AA AgenticEpoch ECISoftware ECIDesignArenaAA Coding v4.x: percentile 98Coding Agent v1.4: percentile 93AA Intelligence (est.): percentile 97Epoch ECI: percentile 89Software ECI: percentile 90DesignArena: percentile 81

AA Coding v4.x 78.0Coding Agent v1.4 67.0AA Intelligence (est.) 47.8AA Agentic —Epoch ECI 164.5Software ECI 166.4DesignArena 1254/1306

Radar: percentile among all models measured on each input; a gap means not measured.

Benchmark sheet

63 of 319 registered benchmark versions · bars show the percentile among all models measured on each benchmark.

9 of 64 values are Anthropic's own claims (†), not independent measurements; a matching independent result replaces a claim as soon as one exists.

Composite attachments (used in the score, not counted as exact benchmarks):
  • Epoch ECI · attached
  • Software ECI · attached
  • DesignArena Web Apps (agentic) · attached
  • DesignArena Full-Stack · attached
Compare this model →

Agentic

  • AA-AnalystAgent9453.8%

    AA-AnalystAgent published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests analyst tasks using agentic Python execution across fourteen domains.

  • AA-Briefcase991,645 Elo

    AA-Briefcase published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multi-week professional knowledge-work projects with linked tasks and large source collections.

  • GDPval-AA v2991,735 Elo

    GDPval-AA v2 v2 → · Published board — Tests professional knowledge-work deliverables across occupations using AA's Stirrup harness.

  • Harvey LAB-AA9493.5%

    Harvey LAB-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests legal-work deliverables across practice areas on Harvey's private task set. Artificial Analysis' run, graded by one LLM judge against task rubrics — not the same run or scale as Vals AI's HLAB row.

  • Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA)9789.1%

    Terminal-Bench v2.1 (AA) v2.1 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 89-task verified refresh using Terminus 2.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA)9549.0%

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 (AA) v4.0 → · Published board — Tests terminal-based work on the 66-task release using mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6.

  • ApprenticeBench API (NeoCognition)9249.0%

    ApprenticeBench API (NeoCognition) published 2026-09-14 → · Claude Code — An agent completes the same 100 sequential accounts-payable tasks in the Odoo ERP with diminishing mentoring, using dedicated application API calls instead of the screen interface.

  • ApprenticeBench CUA (NeoCognition)7736.0%

    ApprenticeBench CUA (NeoCognition) published 2026-09-14 → · Claude Code — A computer-use agent operates the Odoo ERP through its screens across 100 sequential accounts-payable tasks with diminishing mentoring.

  • EBR-bench (Earthborne Rangers, Epoch AI)7345.7%

    EBR-bench (Earthborne Rangers, Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Learning-capability test: models repeatedly play the obscure campaign board game Earthborne Rangers with note-taking, and the score measures whether results improve across playthroughs.

  • τ^τ-bench (Hyper-τ), release v1 (Sierra)no percentile23.9%

    τ^τ-bench (Hyper-τ), release v1 (Sierra) release-v1 → · Claude Code — A coding agent builds a working customer-service agent from realistic evidence (policies, transcripts, recordings, a client API), and is scored by how well that agent then serves simulated customers on 53 held-out tasks.

  • OSWorld 2.0, August 2026 task release (XLANG Lab) v2026.08.08no percentile31.4%

    OSWorld 2.0, August 2026 task release (XLANG Lab) v2026.08.08 → · batch tool — A computer-use agent completes 108 long-horizon, real-world workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop applications, each taking a person about 1.6 hours.

  • RSI-Exam 0.1 (aiming-lab)670.46

    RSI-Exam 0.1 (aiming-lab) v0.1 → · Claude Code — An agent spends a long, budgeted run improving an inherited, working-but-weak executable research method or harness on a visible split, and the single artifact it submits is re-run once on a sealed hidden split across 88 executable research tasks in six domains.

  • Terminal-Bench v4.0developer's claim51.8%† self-reported by the developer

    Terminal-Bench v4.0 → · Claude Code — A benchmark to measure and evolve with the frontier of agent work, whose homepage leaderboard reports resolution rate on Terminal-Bench 4.0 tasks.

  • Finance Agent v2 (Vals Index v2)8458.6%

    Finance Agent v2 (Vals Index v2) v2 → · Published board — Multi-step financial reasoning tasks.

  • HLAB — Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals Index v2)516.7%

    HLAB — Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals Index v2) v2 → · Published board — Long-horizon legal work product creation. The index column is Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark's own published standalone score, reported as accuracy — not comparable with Artificial Analysis' Harvey LAB-AA row.

  • Vals Index v2 (Vals AI)9567.2%

    Vals Index v2 (Vals AI) v2 → · Published board — GDP-weighted average of agentic model performance across finance, coding and legal tasks.

  • LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement)849.5%

    LMArena Agent Arena (overall net improvement) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Ranking of models as the orchestrator in LMArena’s Agent Mode, scored by the causal net improvement over the average model across behavioural signals from real sessions.

Coding

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.48867.0%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.4 v1.4 → · Claude Code — The retained AA Coding Agent Index measures coding-agent systems using the earlier three-component implementation.

  • Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.56759.7%

    Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 v1.5 → · Claude Code — Measures coding-agent systems on DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 and SWE-Atlas-QnA.

  • SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.18556.4%

    SciCode (AA subproblems) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests scientific Python programming with scientist-annotated background information.

  • CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor)developer's claim46.6%† self-reported by the developer

    CursorBench 4.0 (Cursor) v4.0 → · Published board — Agent evaluation on ambiguous, multi-file tasks drawn from real Cursor sessions.

  • DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI)9773.6%

    DeepSWE (Datacurve, via Epoch AI) published 2026-09-15 → · mini-SWE-agent — Pass rate of coding agents on original, long-horizon software engineering tasks, run by Datacurve with the mini-swe-agent harness.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition)developer's claim48.0%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Main (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on tasks crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • KernelBench-CUDA: Grid MinGRU SPS (RTX PRO 6000)100196.1

    KernelBench-CUDA: Grid MinGRU SPS (RTX PRO 6000) rtx-pro-6000 → · Published board — Non-LLM RL simulation: maximise simulation steps per second for a grid world with a MinGRU agent (roofline anchored at 150M peak SPS); fusion optional.

  • KernelBench-CUDA: MegaQwen Decode (RTX PRO 6000)896.55

    KernelBench-CUDA: MegaQwen Decode (RTX PRO 6000) rtx-pro-6000 → · Published board — Improve the known MegaQwen CUDA megakernel geometry for decode-only token throughput at context lengths 2k–128k (roofline anchored on that decode-only tok/s ceiling); prefill is untimed.

  • SWE-bench Multilingualdeveloper's claim89.5%† self-reported by the developer

    SWE-bench Multilingual published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A 300-instance SWE-bench variant with tasks from 42 repositories across 9 programming languages.

  • SWE-bench Multimodaldeveloper's claim59.4%† self-reported by the developer

    SWE-bench Multimodal published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — A 480-instance SWE-bench variant whose issue descriptions include visual elements.

  • Code Migration (Vals Index v2 subset)9056.7%

    Code Migration (Vals Index v2 subset) v2 → · Published board — Porting projects to another language, including COBOL modernization.

  • MLS-Bench-Lite 30-tasks7549.8

    MLS-Bench-Lite 30-tasks → · Claude Code (max effort) — AI agents get a fixed ML research scaffold with strong baselines and must invent one algorithmic change — a loss, optimizer, sampler or training procedure — whose gain holds across settings, seeds, datasets and scales; Lite is the 30-task subset over all 12 research domains.

  • FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition)developer's claim58.9%† self-reported by the developer

    FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (Cognition) v1.1 → · Claude Code — Whether a maintainer would merge the agent's pull request, on the full 150-task FrontierCode set crafted by open-source maintainers and graded with tests, rubrics and verifiers.

  • LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall)861,693 Elo

    LMArena WebDev (Code Arena, overall) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Community pairwise-vote ranking of models on front-end web development tasks, including agentic multi-step coding, published by LMArena as a Bradley-Terry rating.

  • AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-279878.0

    AA Coding Index v4.x · frozen 2026-10-27 → · Published board — Artificial Analysis withdrew the Coding Index with Intelligence Index v5.0 (2026-10-28). These are the last v4.x values, frozen with their own date (2026-10-27).

Efficiency

Knowledge

Long-context

  • GDP.pdf (AA)8221.6%

    GDP.pdf (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests professional reasoning over long PDFs with AA document preparation and grading.

  • AA-LCR v1.18579.3%

    AA-LCR v1.1 v1.1 → · Published board — Tests reasoning across multiple long documents with corrected answer keys and grading.

  • MLCR-AA9455.6%

    MLCR-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests medical-record synthesis and reasoning across long, fragmented case documents.

  • Context Arena — MRCR v2 (8-needle)9897.8%

    Context Arena — MRCR v2 (8-needle) 8-needle → · Published board — The model must find and reproduce the right one of eight near-identical earlier replies hidden in a long conversation, averaged over context lengths from 8k to 128k tokens.

Math

  • FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI)7473.2%

    FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI) v2 → · Published board — The hardest, research-level tier of Epoch AI's unpublished FrontierMath problems, run by Epoch AI on its private v2 set.

  • FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 v2 (Epoch AI)8385.6%

    FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 v2 (Epoch AI) v2 → · Published board — Unpublished, expert-written mathematics problems from undergraduate to research level with automatically checkable answers, run by Epoch AI on its private v2 set.

  • ArXivMath 06/2026 (MathArena)5082.6%

    ArXivMath 06/2026 (MathArena) 2026-06 → · Published board — Research-level math problems with a checkable final answer, drawn from arXiv papers submitted in June 2026; each edition is restricted to papers published within the last month to reduce training-data contamination.

  • BrokenArXiv 06/2026 (MathArena)7390.7%

    BrokenArXiv 06/2026 (MathArena) 2026-06 → · Published board — Plausible but false proof statements taken from June 2026 arXiv papers; a model scores by refusing to prove them and saying the statement is false as written.

Reasoning

  • Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI)8342.0%

    Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 novel chess positions generated programmatically by Epoch AI, each with a single Stockfish-verified best move; probes spatial reasoning and planning.

  • LiveBench 2026-06-257480.1

    LiveBench 2026-06-25 → · Published board — A periodically refreshed suite of objectively graded tasks with separate category scores and an overall category mean.

  • Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI)9759.0%

    Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-18 → · Published board — Best-move selection on 100 mid-game positions of a well-known game whose identity Epoch deliberately keeps undisclosed, generated programmatically like Chess Puzzles.

Science

Tool-use

  • AutomationBench-AA v1.0.68156.6%

    AutomationBench-AA v1.0.6 → · Published board — Tests multi-app SaaS workflows through REST tools on a held-out AutomationBench split.

  • EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA8947.5%

    EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests enterprise workflows through MCP tools against resettable application environments.

  • τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.18942.1%

    τ³-Banking (AA) v1.0.1 → · Published board — Tests banking support agents that retrieve policies and change account state through tools.

  • Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals Index v2)9273.6%

    Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals Index v2) v2 → · Published board — Building and editing financial models in spreadsheets.

Vision

  • MMMU Pro (AA)9684.7%

    MMMU Pro (AA) published 2026-09-10 → · Published board — Tests multimodal understanding using challenging ten-option questions.

  • Chartography 100-tasks4427.3%

    Chartography 100-tasks → · Published board — Can a model read the charts professionals rely on — Kaplan-Meier curves, candlesticks, contour maps, Sankey diagrams, Bode plots, wind roses — from the image alone, to an expert-set precision?

  • GDP.pdf 100-tasks6124.0%

    GDP.pdf 100-tasks → · Published board — Can a model answer real professional questions about the PDFs work runs on — manuals, wiring diagrams, filings, forms — so that every rubric criterion an expert wrote is met?

  • Furniture Assembly Benchmark (Epoch AI)8560.8%

    Furniture Assembly Benchmark (Epoch AI) published 2026-09-26 → · Published board — Spatial-reasoning test by Epoch AI: given a photo of a partly or fully assembled IKEA product and its official manual, the model must say whether the build is correct and, if not, name the step with the mistake.

Unusual results

3 threshold-crossing signals flagged · 39 eligible benchmark families

How flags are calculated

Heuristic screen, not statistical significance: benchmark families are correlated and source uncertainty is unknown. Peer evidence needs ≥ 20 independently measured matched configurations from ≥ 10 distinct model families. A flag needs a directed population z-score of magnitude ≥ 1.5 and a gap of ≥ 1.5 from the leave-one-benchmark-family-out mean z in the same direction, over ≥ 5 other benchmark families.

  • unusually weak Vals Index v2 cost per test (Vals AI)
    Why
    Observed: 18.81021 USD
    Peer mean 6.89364 · peer sd 7.83661 · n 38 · families 37
    Directed z -1.521 · baseline z 1.19 · gap -2.71 · profile n 38
    18.81021 USDmeasured· 18.81 USD per rolloutobserved 2026-09-26vals.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: Vals Index v2 cost per test (Vals AI) · v2 · Published board
    Exact value: 18.810212 USD
    Published mean cost: 18.810212 USD per rollout
    Observed: 2026-09-26T04:22:13.903077+00:00 · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: public:ffda78fe1c388b1cae263889
  • unusually strong CritPt (AA) published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.29143 fraction
    Peer mean 0.04412 · peer sd 0.08179 · n 537 · families 370
    Directed z 3.024 · baseline z 1.07 · gap 1.954 · profile n 38
    0.29143 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: CritPt (AA) · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.291428571428571 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:b8fc61f7-5e9a-49e6-8547-6ac56db24627:critpt
  • unusually strong Humanity's Last Exam (AA text-only) published 2026-09-10
    Why
    Observed: 0.54866 fraction
    Peer mean 0.15894 · peer sd 0.14559 · n 623 · families 450
    Directed z 2.677 · baseline z 1.079 · gap 1.598 · profile n 38
    0.54866 fractionmeasuredobserved 2026-09-10artificialanalysis.ai ↗
    Evidence
    Axis: Humanity's Last Exam (AA text-only) · published 2026-09-10 · Published board
    Exact value: 0.548656163113994 fraction
    Observed: 2026-09-10T21:47:16.627Z · publication date: not recorded
    Observation id: aa:b8fc61f7-5e9a-49e6-8547-6ac56db24627:hle
Missing coverage · 256 benchmark versions

No result does not mean a zero, or that the model was never tested. Collection failures and disputed versions retain their distinct status.

Variants / reasoning settings

Artificial Analysis snapshot 2026-11-03 · Intelligence Index v5.0 (est. = estimated from v4, not measured) · Coding Index v4.x frozen 2026-10-27 · Data: Artificial Analysis · Data: Epoch AI (CC BY)

VariantAA CodingAA Intelligence
Claude Opus 5 (Max)78.047.8est.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)77.046.1est.
Claude Opus 5 (High)76.543.4est.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)74.334.6est.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)66.929.5est.
Opus 5 (none)——

SUBSCRIPTION PLAN

GitHub Copilot

Current usage-based billing · model token cost is converted to AI Credits at 1 credit = $0.01.

Input $5.00 / 1M
Cached input $0.500 / 1M
Cache write $6.25 / 1M
Output $25.00 / 1M
Status GA
Token offers by platform · 12 offers (Adjusted $/task)

Click any underlined price to see how it is estimated and where each input comes from. How we calculate adjusted cost.

12 offers within the active global filters, 4 more outside them; “price n/a” means the provider serves the model but publishes no direct token price we could collect — no other channel's price is shown in its place.

OpenRouter (8)

Prices via OpenRouter — what OpenRouter charges for each provider's endpoint, not the provider's own direct price. Source: openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-opus-5/providers, collected 2026-11-03.

Google
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Amazon Bedrock
Azure
Google
Google
Amazon Bedrock

Azure AI Foundry (1)

Direct prices from Azure AI Foundry's own price list. Source: prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices, collected 2026-11-03.

Azure AI Foundry

Google Vertex AI (2)

Direct prices from Google Vertex AI's own price list. Source: cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing, collected 2026-11-03.

Google Vertex AI
Google Vertex AI

AWS Bedrock (1)

Direct prices from AWS Bedrock's own price list. Source: aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/, collected 2026-11-03.

AWS Bedrock
Claude Opus 5 (Max) — benchmarks & cost | Benchmark Heaven